am i a 'moderate'? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 04, 2024, 01:07:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  am i a 'moderate'? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: am i a 'moderate'?  (Read 8648 times)
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« on: August 05, 2004, 10:45:25 AM »

most of my political heros were liberals--terry sanford, frank porter graham,  robert kennedy.

i actually prefer to look at them as progressives and not liberals.  there is a difference between the two.  john kerry and john edwards are liberals, but there is nothing progressive about them.  there is a shortage of progressives today.

Liberal is not a bad word.  Remember Bush the Elder used the words liberal and democratic (small l, small d) when he described the Founders' ideals.  Most of my heroes are liberal as well.  At least back when liberal didn't mean taking away your rights to keep your income, bear arms, hire and fire whomever you want for whatever reason, etc.  Presumably you don't like to be called a Liberal Republican.  I also detest that label.  (republicans won't like you 'cause you're "liberal" and democrats won't like you 'cause you're "republican" so you have to hang out with the geeks and libertarians.)    

St. Thomas Aquinas once wrote, "Lord, grant me chastity.  But not today."  Everyone forgets, that like St. Francis of Assisi, he was a hardcore party animal and hedonist in his youth.  

Taking sexual abstinence as a metaphor for the often more intense passions evoked in public policy debates, you might be called an Aquinas Moderate.  I like to be called a Franciscan Moderate, but I can't get birds and mammals to flock near me.  Anyway, Robert Kennedy is a moderate as well, so if he's one of your heroes, you may not be far off moderate.
Logged
angus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,424
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2004, 01:24:49 PM »

MANY questions are actually irrelevant to the scales they're using.

Yep.  I wonder what the question about keeping busy with more cheerful things means.

That struck me as a bit nonsequitur also.  Then I thought about it.  Remember the test that asked whether you trust attorneys or physicians more?  (I put attorneys, which makes me a "democrat" as opposed to a "republican")  I think those things are there to help you separate politics from psychology.  If you're asked about welfare, you already know the party line you're supposed to be towing.  If they ask you something that doesn't come up in public policy discourse, you're more likely to give a gut answer.  Keeping busy with more cheerful things may be optimistic.  The way Teddy Roosevelt Republicans and Imperialists with fascist foreign policies are.  Or it may suggest secrecy (Hallmark of Reagan Republicans), or an unwillingness to think about the cost of agressive militaristic foreign policy.  Or, on the domestic policy front, the kind of folks who are cheerful may respond well to statements like "It's morning again in America."  As opposed to more pessimistic ones like "I see two Americas."
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.