''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 20, 2024, 02:09:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  ''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy  (Read 7344 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,209
United States


« on: January 16, 2009, 09:37:35 PM »

I'd like to add an addendum to the code, though; blue eyes are worth ten green eyes, green eyes are worth a hundred brown eyes

     You forgot hazel eyes, but they can fit in right between green & brown.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 10 queries.