Substantive Due Process (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 11:42:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Substantive Due Process (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which is it?
#1
Sound legal concept
 
#2
Oxymoron with no constitutional support
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 10

Author Topic: Substantive Due Process  (Read 1707 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« on: June 23, 2006, 03:32:39 PM »

Discuss.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2006, 06:11:54 AM »

That's the idea, anyway; "substantive due process" deals with the actual substance of laws, whereas actual (procedural) due process deals with how those laws are applied. But there's no clear line between the two, because (the substance of) many laws govern procedural matters; it is completely uncontroversial for the Due Process Clauses to be read as restricting the substance of statutes in that context. And of course, hypothetically, a procedural requirement that throws a major obstacle in the way of enforcing a law, can make enforcing the statute not worth the trouble.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.