Robocall attacks Kitten Killer Killary Klinton

[Meeker]

Verily- most jokes are supposed to contain an element of truth, and in your case the 'element of truth' was supposed to be the Clintons cynicism and the example used was implied to be that Hillary's tears in NH were calculated. Now I don't know if they are or aren't but that's an assumption. But I'll take you at your word that you don't approve the message and let's leave it at that.

Oh, don't take me that way. I do think the New Hampshire tears were calculated. The question she was asked was (and I'm paraphrasing), "How do you always look so good?" If anyone broke down in tears after being asked that question, you'd call them either a faker or mentally unstable, and much as I dislike Clinton, I don't think she's mentally unstable.

Actually it was "How do you do it?"

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/01/clinton-gets-em.html

[Meeker]

Verily- most jokes are supposed to contain an element of truth, and in your case the 'element of truth' was supposed to be the Clintons cynicism and the example used was implied to be that Hillary's tears in NH were calculated. Now I don't know if they are or aren't but that's an assumption. But I'll take you at your word that you don't approve the message and let's leave it at that.

Oh, don't take me that way. I do think the New Hampshire tears were calculated. The question she was asked was (and I'm paraphrasing), "How do you always look so good?" If anyone broke down in tears after being asked that question, you'd call them either a faker or mentally unstable, and much as I dislike Clinton, I don't think she's mentally unstable.

Actually it was "How do you do it?" It had nothing to do with her appearance.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/01/clinton-gets-em.html

Yes, "How do you do it?" - in context, meaning, "How do you keep your appearance up on the campaign trail?"

No, she was asking about how she remains emotionally stable during the campaign

[Meeker]

Verily- most jokes are supposed to contain an element of truth, and in your case the 'element of truth' was supposed to be the Clintons cynicism and the example used was implied to be that Hillary's tears in NH were calculated. Now I don't know if they are or aren't but that's an assumption. But I'll take you at your word that you don't approve the message and let's leave it at that.

Oh, don't take me that way. I do think the New Hampshire tears were calculated. The question she was asked was (and I'm paraphrasing), "How do you always look so good?" If anyone broke down in tears after being asked that question, you'd call them either a faker or mentally unstable, and much as I dislike Clinton, I don't think she's mentally unstable.

Actually it was "How do you do it?" It had nothing to do with her appearance.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/01/clinton-gets-em.html

Yes, "How do you do it?" - in context, meaning, "How do you keep your appearance up on the campaign trail?"

No, she was asking about how she remains emotionally stable during the campaign

Which, obviously, has everything to do with her hair and face. I just wish we had the full quote of the question to work with, not the clipped version with a summary of the comments about Clinton's wonderful appearance.

?

Emotional stability = Hair and face?

[Meeker]

Verily- most jokes are supposed to contain an element of truth, and in your case the 'element of truth' was supposed to be the Clintons cynicism and the example used was implied to be that Hillary's tears in NH were calculated. Now I don't know if they are or aren't but that's an assumption. But I'll take you at your word that you don't approve the message and let's leave it at that.

Oh, don't take me that way. I do think the New Hampshire tears were calculated. The question she was asked was (and I'm paraphrasing), "How do you always look so good?" If anyone broke down in tears after being asked that question, you'd call them either a faker or mentally unstable, and much as I dislike Clinton, I don't think she's mentally unstable.

Actually it was "How do you do it?" It had nothing to do with her appearance.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/01/clinton-gets-em.html

Yes, "How do you do it?" - in context, meaning, "How do you keep your appearance up on the campaign trail?"

No, she was asking about how she remains emotionally stable during the campaign

Which, obviously, has everything to do with her hair and face. I just wish we had the full quote of the question to work with, not the clipped version with a summary of the comments about Clinton's wonderful appearance.

?

Emotional stability = Hair and face?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yes... but that was a minor part of the overall question where she asked who did her hair. The main question was about her emotional stability.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/07/clinton.emotional/

[Meeker]

Verily- most jokes are supposed to contain an element of truth, and in your case the 'element of truth' was supposed to be the Clintons cynicism and the example used was implied to be that Hillary's tears in NH were calculated. Now I don't know if they are or aren't but that's an assumption. But I'll take you at your word that you don't approve the message and let's leave it at that.

Oh, don't take me that way. I do think the New Hampshire tears were calculated. The question she was asked was (and I'm paraphrasing), "How do you always look so good?" If anyone broke down in tears after being asked that question, you'd call them either a faker or mentally unstable, and much as I dislike Clinton, I don't think she's mentally unstable.

Actually it was "How do you do it?" It had nothing to do with her appearance.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/01/clinton-gets-em.html

Yes, "How do you do it?" - in context, meaning, "How do you keep your appearance up on the campaign trail?"

No, she was asking about how she remains emotionally stable during the campaign

Which, obviously, has everything to do with her hair and face. I just wish we had the full quote of the question to work with, not the clipped version with a summary of the comments about Clinton's wonderful appearance.

?

Emotional stability = Hair and face?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yes... but that was a minor part of the overall question where she asked who did her hair. The main question was about her emotional stability.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/07/clinton.emotional/

It's a still a flattering question about how wonderful she is. Yeah, I would break down crying is someone told me how wonderful I am.

Well, you've also never been through a grueling year long Presidential campaign and spent the previous 15 years or so being ripped apart in the national media. I'd imagine she has quite a different worldview of things especially when it comes to someone praising you.

[Meeker]

Verily- most jokes are supposed to contain an element of truth, and in your case the 'element of truth' was supposed to be the Clintons cynicism and the example used was implied to be that Hillary's tears in NH were calculated. Now I don't know if they are or aren't but that's an assumption. But I'll take you at your word that you don't approve the message and let's leave it at that.

Oh, don't take me that way. I do think the New Hampshire tears were calculated. The question she was asked was (and I'm paraphrasing), "How do you always look so good?" If anyone broke down in tears after being asked that question, you'd call them either a faker or mentally unstable, and much as I dislike Clinton, I don't think she's mentally unstable.

Actually it was "How do you do it?" It had nothing to do with her appearance.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/01/clinton-gets-em.html

Yes, "How do you do it?" - in context, meaning, "How do you keep your appearance up on the campaign trail?"

No, she was asking about how she remains emotionally stable during the campaign

Which, obviously, has everything to do with her hair and face. I just wish we had the full quote of the question to work with, not the clipped version with a summary of the comments about Clinton's wonderful appearance.

?

Emotional stability = Hair and face?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yes... but that was a minor part of the overall question where she asked who did her hair. The main question was about her emotional stability.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/07/clinton.emotional/

It's a still a flattering question about how wonderful she is. Yeah, I would break down crying is someone told me how wonderful I am.

Well, you've also never been through a grueling year long Presidential campaign and spent the previous 15 years or so being ripped apart in the national media. I'd imagine she has quite a different worldview of things especially when it comes to someone praising you.

I don't buy it. Maybe had they been "tears of joy", but then the media wouldn't have latched onto it. And Clinton has never been "ripped apart" by the news media, except maybe for about six months in 1998 and in 1993.

So how did 50% of the nation grow to hate her? There's been a consistent anti-Clinton message pushed out at America for 15 years. Many have a legitimate reason for disliking her (like most on this board), but the vast majority of her detractors just dislike her because they've been told that a lot of people hate her and they should too.

I happen to believe she was being genuine and has the capacity to be a human being. Agree to disagree.

[Meeker]

Verily- most jokes are supposed to contain an element of truth, and in your case the 'element of truth' was supposed to be the Clintons cynicism and the example used was implied to be that Hillary's tears in NH were calculated. Now I don't know if they are or aren't but that's an assumption. But I'll take you at your word that you don't approve the message and let's leave it at that.

Oh, don't take me that way. I do think the New Hampshire tears were calculated. The question she was asked was (and I'm paraphrasing), "How do you always look so good?" If anyone broke down in tears after being asked that question, you'd call them either a faker or mentally unstable, and much as I dislike Clinton, I don't think she's mentally unstable.

Actually it was "How do you do it?" It had nothing to do with her appearance.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/01/clinton-gets-em.html

Yes, "How do you do it?" - in context, meaning, "How do you keep your appearance up on the campaign trail?"

No, she was asking about how she remains emotionally stable during the campaign

Which, obviously, has everything to do with her hair and face. I just wish we had the full quote of the question to work with, not the clipped version with a summary of the comments about Clinton's wonderful appearance.

?

Emotional stability = Hair and face?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yes... but that was a minor part of the overall question where she asked who did her hair. The main question was about her emotional stability.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/07/clinton.emotional/

It's a still a flattering question about how wonderful she is. Yeah, I would break down crying is someone told me how wonderful I am.

Well, you've also never been through a grueling year long Presidential campaign and spent the previous 15 years or so being ripped apart in the national media. I'd imagine she has quite a different worldview of things especially when it comes to someone praising you.

I don't buy it. Maybe had they been "tears of joy", but then the media wouldn't have latched onto it. And Clinton has never been "ripped apart" by the news media, except maybe for about six months in 1998 and in 1993.

So how did 50% of the nation grow to hate her? There's been a consistent anti-Clinton message pushed out at America for 15 years. Many have a legitimate reason for disliking her (like most on this board), but the vast majority of her detractors just dislike her because they've been told that a lot of people hate her and they should too.

This is not "the media", but rather the right-wing talk radio, etc., which spends just as much time going after Gore, Obama, Kerry, Dean, and whomever else. The 50% of the country that hates Clinton hates her mostly for ideological reasons; they perceive her as very liberal. Whether this is true or not is irrelevant, and I have never actually seen a serious, mainstream news source (well, except FOX) which suggested that Clinton was an ultra-liberal.

But when CNN and other outlets cover what's being said by those right-wing talk radio outfits they're participating in getting the message out as well. And even if they do hate her because she's uber-liberal or something else, the bottom line is that a majority of her detractors didn't really come to that conclusion on their own but rather developed it because they've been hearing people tell them that for 15 years.

We've gotten completely off the original subject though.