Should public schools give away free lubricant?

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

Yes they should.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

And if she's broke - then I guess she'll have to give the baby up for adoption and not abort it - problem solved!

Well, in civilized countries, childbirth is free, but not in the US.  So you're still going to have to end up paying for something.

Don't use logic on anti-choicers. They're too concerned about fetuses being removed to factor in the economic and social impacts of their dreams.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

Cons live in a dream world of perfect morality while libs live in a dream world of presuming that everyone is nice and thus we odn't need to do anything to defend the west from the islamic enemy. Both sides need to get out of politics.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

Yes they should, but the kind should be closely monitored. Certain lubricants actually break down condoms.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

And if she's broke - then I guess she'll have to give the baby up for adoption and not abort it - problem solved!

Well, in civilized countries, childbirth is free, but not in the US.  So you're still going to have to end up paying for something.

Don't use logic on anti-choicers. They're too concerned about fetuses being removed to factor in the economic and social impacts of their dreams.

You're right - my first priority is protecting lives.  And i I screw up both the economy and society, well then that's just too bad.

I consider society as a whole and economics to be more important than the individual fetuses.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

Why not favor a mass program to get off of oil and rebuild this country to be more energy efficient(as in ending suburbia once and for all)?

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

Why do you favor putting gay kids at risk by not providing lube?

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

Thank you goo sir for emphasizing my point so that even those who unfairly put me on ignore than read.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

What if they have homophobic parents?

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

1 Disgusting. Homophobia needs to be stopped as soon as possible.

2 I'd only provide condoms and lube. I wouldn't provide BDSM gear or gloves or other stuff.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

There's a difference between an ingrained orientation you can't change like homosexuality/bisexual and fetishes like BDSM so never compare the two again.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

Stop unnecesarily complicating things. You do exactly what you accuse me of doing.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

Read my earlier post. I said that I draw the line because BDSM/sex toy play are fetish actions one can choose and not ingrained orientations like being straight/gay.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

1 That goes against human nature. Abstinence doesn't work so just give that up.

2The lubricant is to make gay sex safer and not painful. Your proposal goes beyond that.

[Undisguised Sockpuppet]

Why not just provide pre-lubed condoms?

Because it's a waste of taxpayer money - they can buy their own condoms.  Their $.25 in the bathrooms.

If you can't afford a condom, you definitely can't afford to raise a child...so it's probably a better idea to spend 25 cents of taxpayer money on the condom, than having society pay for a 18 years worth of aid to the poor child?

Good point. We should discourage people having kids and move to automation.