|
1
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Update Season VII: "The OK Corral"
|
on: Today at 03:41:07 am
|
...while praying that the Blessed Lord comes to destroy us all for our sins...
I have to say I have a deep sympathy for anyone who dreams impotently of the destruction of others. Porn and Ameriplan are bare necessities? Come on... quit your trolling. It's perfectly realistic for him to not rip off his parents.
Those items are very small amounts of money and neither they nor his food and gasoline are significant contributors to the family's poverty. That of course, is caused by their class position and resulting low income: i.e., it is not Bushies fault nor their own. Small amounts of money add up over time. My guess is that he's been taking many "small amounts" of money for most of his life.
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Update Season VII: "The OK Corral"
|
on: May 24, 2013, 05:37:26 pm
|
Especially since they live in a mobile home. I don't know many who are well off living in mobile homes. I don't know anyone living in mobile homes period, but what's beside the point.
Yeah, for as much as he "knows" about severe weather, it's pretty odd that he was willing to defraud his parents for porn for years (among the other ways that he's defrauded them). With all he's scammed out of them, who knows, they might be able to live somewhere that's not a death trap during severe storms. Utter offensive drivel as always Inks (and no better than most commenters on this thread): In fact he has merely eked out the barest necessities of life from his parents, not any great amount of money which could by any stretch of the imagine lead to paying for a house. If you guys want to badger and criticize BushOK, please try to keep it realistic. All this fantastic gobbledigook you spew just makes you seem manic rather than offering a real critique. Applying this to his food intake - it sounds as if he's eating much less than previously and certainly far less than I do for one (and I'll wager no more than most of you do). Porn and Ameriplan are bare necessities? Come on... quit your trolling. It's perfectly realistic for him to not rip off his parents.
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Update Season VII: "The OK Corral"
|
on: May 24, 2013, 05:33:00 pm
|
Especially since they live in a mobile home. I don't know many who are well off living in mobile homes. I don't know anyone living in mobile homes period, but what's beside the point.
Yeah, for as much as he "knows" about severe weather, it's pretty odd that he was willing to defraud his parents for porn for years (among the other ways that he's defrauded them). With all he's scammed out of them, who knows, they might be able to live somewhere that's not a death trap during severe storms. They've been living in a mobile home since 1981. They would rather be living in a regular house, and maybe moving into Grandma's house whenever she passes. Them being able to afford a regular house has no bearing on me. They'd be closer to buying a home if they weren't preoccupied funding your scams and your poor decisions.
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Questions and Answers / The Atlas / Re: Recent bans
|
on: May 24, 2013, 03:58:27 am
|
|
Yeah, I figured this warranted it since HPJ recently declared a Senate candidacy in Atlasia, and once I started, I figured I'd do all the recent ones.
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Update Season VII: "The OK Corral"
|
on: May 24, 2013, 02:08:16 am
|
Especially since they live in a mobile home. I don't know many who are well off living in mobile homes. I don't know anyone living in mobile homes period, but what's beside the point.
Yeah, for as much as he "knows" about severe weather, it's pretty odd that he was willing to defraud his parents for porn for years (among the other ways that he's defrauded them). With all he's scammed out of them, who knows, they might be able to live somewhere that's not a death trap during severe storms.
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Questions and Answers / The Atlas / Re: Recent bans
|
on: May 24, 2013, 02:05:01 am
|
You can be banned for having a sock that's never made any posts?
Off the top of my head, I can't remember a time this has happened; we've banned known socks that haven't posted yet (probably about 20 or so of Atheist2006's), but I don't think we've ever banned a sock master whose sock has never posted. Conceivably, I guess we could. I mean technically, it's against the rules, although I'd advocate for leniency in a case like that, if there's been no other sock puppetry. Practically though, the mods probably won't notice someone's sock if the sock never posts. I guess will cross that bridge if we get there.
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
General Politics / Individual Politics / Re: At-will employment
|
on: May 24, 2013, 01:28:21 am
|
It seems to me that if you run a business, who you employ and under what terms you employ them should be your prerogative.
For the good of humanity, most people disagree. The good of humanity? That's a bit of an exaggeration. It's not like employers just go around firing people for fun in at-will states. It's a common sense policy; if you want to have job security, contract for your job. Otherwise, when you apply to an at-will employer, you know what you're risking.
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
Forum Community / Forum Community / Re: Update Season VII: "The OK Corral"
|
on: May 23, 2013, 10:23:00 pm
|
Good Thursday Evening! I had another wonderful evening putting the kids to bed. I will be going over there again tomorrow evening, staying the night with them, going to the Zoo Saturday Morning, playing with them Saturday Afternoon, then going to the Airport to pick up their daddy and delivering their daddy back to them in one piece! I'll be home by 12:30 Sunday Morning and then get up and get ready for Sunday Morning Worship!! It's going to be a great end to the week.  I'm guessing that you didn't do well on the capitalization chapter in your elementary English class?
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
General Politics / U.S. General Discussion / Re: IRS denied Dem-leaning groups exemptions, ok'd tea party groups
|
on: May 23, 2013, 03:38:17 pm
|
Isn't it accepted that tea party groups were targeted? I'm no fan of theirs by any means, but I feel like y'all are grasping for straws here. It isn't a matter of whether they targeted groups. It's a matter of who okay'd it. I expect nothing less from this forum than to dismiss this all.  Exactly... I mean, it was admitted to. The scandal already exists. Sure, it doesn't reach up to Obama like a lot of the GOP wants, but it's not like nothing happened. lol Kindly read the article and comment. I did.
|
|
|
|
|
|