''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 02:53:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  ''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy  (Read 7406 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« on: January 01, 2009, 06:15:58 PM »
Justified by what?

"Eye for an eye" can be externally ignorant and generally destructive, and that in and of itself is not moral to me.  The main use seems to be catharsis, which is more understandable than sadism but too little removed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.