Should the Weimar Republic have banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 06:26:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Should the Weimar Republic have banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should the Weimar Republic have legally banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933?
#1
Yes, to prevent the Third Reich from being established		  
#2
No, it would be undemocratic and dictatorial, the very thing the Weimer Republic's supporters claimed to be against		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 43

Author Topic: Should the Weimar Republic have banned Adolf Hitler from becoming Chancellor in 1933?  (Read 3713 times)
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,352
Kiribati


« on: April 29, 2024, 07:50:02 AM »
It hitler's parliamentary aims had been stymied, would it have boosted the revolutionary wing of the Nazi Party, Strasser and Rohm?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 14 queries.