Burris Being Refused to be Seated in the Senate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 02:41:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Burris Being Refused to be Seated in the Senate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should he be seated?
#1
Yes (R)
 
#2
Yes (D)
 
#3
Yes (Libertarian)
 
#4
Yes (I/O)
 
#5
No (R)
 
#6
No (D)
 
#7
No (L)
 
#8
No (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 31

Author Topic: Burris Being Refused to be Seated in the Senate  (Read 1904 times)
jamestroll
jamespol
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,556


« on: January 09, 2009, 02:09:07 PM »

We have to stop using the word taint. Please!

And there is no procedural rule saying they can block incoming senators. Rather, they are using technicalities to block him.

The technicality of the whole SoS signature being missing is invalid, at least the way I interpret Marbury v. Madison.

screw the SCOTUS and US Constitution.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.