''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 04:01:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  ''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: ''An eye for an eye'' is a justified policy  (Read 7409 times)
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« on: January 03, 2009, 05:17:38 PM »
Quote from: Rild on January 01, 2009, 06:59:07 PM
We should adopt the code of Hammurabi.
Why not? It'd be significantly more liberal and humane than modern US law enforcement policies. Also, it wouldn't have the entrenched racial/urban disparities of it.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2009, 05:25:29 PM »
Given the conditions in many US prisons with widespread prisoner violence, prison rape and murder being shuffled under the rug in practice it's the case in many cases.
Logged
Matt Damon™
donut4mccain
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,466
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2009, 09:49:13 PM »
Quote from: Rild on January 07, 2009, 01:16:11 AM
I'd like to add an addendum to the code, though; blue eyes are worth ten green eyes, green eyes are worth a hundred brown eyes
No
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.