OK, then it doesn't really matter much to me, I don't even have the full game. 
On profiles, I was talking more about the points in different fields than anything else, since I'd expect some candidates to be stronger than others in reality.
We would decide our own platform though, I realize that. 
Will you create the various positions on the issues or what?
I think that I will issue all "personality" points, as I think that I can do it more fairly and realistically than some people can do it for themselves. I determined that you are correct, in part, but I will assure that all candidates have between 23-27 total points. I think, for instance that I will give Migrendel a 5 Leadership, as he is a maverick, but this will be off-set by the extremeness of his veiws. Stuff like that.
And yes, I will create the possible possitions on the issues. For issues that carry over from the acctual game, I will change the stances to make them more compatable to our forum.
OK, fair enough. I think 27 is a good upper ceiling, but 23 is a little too high. I did this in my head and I can reveal that I gave myself 23, Nym, PB and JFK all 27, for instance. I also found that some members might get below 23 but that none would really get more than 27.
On the game, John Kerry gets a total of 24 personality points. I think that some of our people can beat that.
Kerry is vastly overrated on the game.
Yeah, the Democrats in this game usually are. There is no way Carter could beat Reagan in California! I usually open up candidate editor and edit the GOP candidates to equal their Dem counterparts.
