SB 121-03: Internal Robot Service Act - Passed

[Mr. Reactionary]

Evil robots are spying on your bank accounts at the direction of federal bureaucrats such as the IRS. Spying without a warrant violates search and seizure protections, yet the evil robots and the NPC swamp people who control them appear to be doing it anyway. This law expressly prohibits the practice without a warrant to protect our rights.


Background:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jim-jordan-opens-investigation-accusations-irs-using-ai-spy-taxpayers-en-masse.amp

https://mrctv.org/blog/nick-kangadis/bombshell-report-okeefe-media-group-uncovers-irss-use-ai-spy-americans-bank

[Mr. Reactionary]

I object to the amendment.

If a warrant is issued there is no need to use a robot as the bank must comply with the information request. This would only encourage secret warrants like those of the often abused FISA Court, where very often the government refuses to inform the third party record keeper that it even has a warrant. That limits the ability to challenge abusive practices and gives free reign to federal robots to trawl private financial data effectively without limit. The magistrate or judge issuing the warrant isnt going to verify what ultimately gets catalogued or changed. The traditional warrant process already exists and remains available without need for secret robot spies. And the definition of robot spy applies to private accounts, not general software, so mere systemwide software scans for viruses wouldnt be inherently prohibited.

I also do not see the need of an exception for "imminent threats of death". We are talking about robots spying on bank account data. In what scenario will the hour it takes to get a traditional search warrant have a life or death impact? As worded in the amendment, the feds cannot even have a robot spy ready to go until the emergency exists. This wouldnt really save much time and again, its just to peep in bank accounts. Not every situation needs to have a "except in a super cereal emergency" carve out.

The IRS does not need robot spies. It already has too many tools in its belt to spy on us. The door shouldnt even be left open a crack. Weve existed fine enough without robot spies.

[Mr. Reactionary]

I object to the amendment as I still do not believe it is necessary to use robot spies to scoop up bank account info when more traditional methods of obtaining such information remain available and no information has been presented alleging that these traditional methods are inadequate. I do not wish to open up pandora's box on the issue of government-run robot bank spies even a crack.

[Mr. Reactionary]

Nay

[Mr. Reactionary]

Aye