Texas megathread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 02:36:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Texas megathread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
Author Topic: Texas megathread  (Read 11861 times)
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,063
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #150 on: May 31, 2024, 10:47:25 PM »

https://thetexan.news/elections/2024/pierson-defeats-holland-in-contentious-runoff-for-rockwall-texas-house-seat/article_96209dd2-1dca-11ef-859f-d7d1b227cef8.html
Katrina Pierson won out over Justin Holland. Margin was 56-44.
Got loads of ads for this.
Logged
Steve from Lambeth
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 713
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #151 on: June 01, 2024, 08:17:00 PM »

I thought that thetexan.news was somebody's blog. It must be a particularly badly designed blog, given that almost 10% of the global population is banned from accessing it
Logged
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,051


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #152 on: June 06, 2024, 09:48:35 PM »



I love how this TX-Dem affiliated group made a Vox/ted-ed style video about how to flip TX. For us who are already election experts, it doesn't say much we don't already known (TX Dems are heavily outspent, TX has tons of non-voters, favorable growth to Dems in suburbs, ect), but the comparisons they make to AZ and GA are interesting - in many ways TX is almost like a merger of the 2 states being both southeastern and southwestern characteristics demographically and culturally.

I think the money point really rings true - for decades now Democrats haven't really made any serious investments in TX so the ROI for just investing a little would probably be pretty substantial. We saw this in AZ; as soon as it became treated as a real swing state turnout on both sides (especially Dems) skyrocketed, so much so that in 2022 Sen more votes were cast than in 2016 Pres.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,698
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #153 on: June 07, 2024, 07:35:03 AM »



I love how this TX-Dem affiliated group made a Vox/ted-ed style video about how to flip TX. For us who are already election experts, it doesn't say much we don't already known (TX Dems are heavily outspent, TX has tons of non-voters, favorable growth to Dems in suburbs, ect), but the comparisons they make to AZ and GA are interesting - in many ways TX is almost like a merger of the 2 states being both southeastern and southwestern characteristics demographically and culturally.

I think the money point really rings true - for decades now Democrats haven't really made any serious investments in TX so the ROI for just investing a little would probably be pretty substantial. We saw this in AZ; as soon as it became treated as a real swing state turnout on both sides (especially Dems) skyrocketed, so much so that in 2022 Sen more votes were cast than in 2016 Pres.

The thing is that while Georgia and Arizona certainly ain’t cheap, seriously investing in Texas for the long haul (as opposed to just specific races) would be an absolute money pit.  Unless there is a real path to statewide victory in non-freak circumstances there within the decade (and I don’t think there is right now for most races), it’s just not worth it.

Democrats are far better off focusing on

1) Flipping the State House before the next round of redistricting (certainly an uphill climb, but not nearly to the extent you’d think; if you’re wondering where national money would help the most, this is where);

2) State Supreme Court Races - Solid recruits generally outperform the baseline by quite a bit here; 

3) The occasional genuinely competitive house race (specifically, defending Vincente González and Cueller’s seat once he’s out of office, credible primary loss insurance candidates in Tony Gonzales’ seat, and recruiting strong candidates to run against De La Cruz instead of ceding the seat).

4) Freak situations like 2018 Senate and TX AG are fine, but don’t waste money on fool’s gold.  Normally Cruz in 2022 would be a great example where the goal should just be to make Republicans waste money, but we don’t have any other offensive opportunities this cycle and IIRC the DSCC has more money than it knows what to do with, so I don’t mind as much as I normally would if they make a play here (just not at the expense of playing defense in other states).
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.229 seconds with 12 queries.