Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 21, 2009, 04:42:13 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpCalendarLogin Register
News: *Note* Updated various scripts to version 1.1.10 on 10/15/09 -> please let me know if there are any observed issues.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Sam Spade, Joe Republic)
| | |-+  Colorado Senate 2010
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Colorado Senate 2010  (Read 249 times)
Governor Vepres
Vepres
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3135
United States


Political Matrix
E: +4.26, S: -5.74

P P
View Profile
« on: November 07, 2009, 01:31:20 pm »
Ignore

Looks to be very exciting election. Bennet seems to be a weak candidate who only ties with even the more obscure Republican challengers. Jane Norton is the front-runner in the Republican primaries for sure, but I could see a Ken Buck victory after seeing him interviewed. Norton's only problem is that the Democrats could make her look like a right wing religious zealot.

Senate Majority Leader Andrew Romanoff is challenging Bennet. He's a very effective legislator who has worked with both parties successfully.

Don't be surprised if a third party candidate gets a few percentage points as well. Colorado has a lot of independents, thus third party and independent candidates do well here. Doug Campbell won 2.56% of the vote in the Senatorial race last year. He reached 5% in some counties.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2009, 01:43:38 pm by Governor Vepres »Logged

Karma Police
Evilmexicandictator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7136
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: -4.00, S: -5.57


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2009, 01:32:54 pm »
Ignore

The Democrats are definitely going to have problems holding onto this one.
Logged

Governor Vepres
Vepres
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3135
United States


Political Matrix
E: +4.26, S: -5.74

P P
View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2009, 01:41:14 pm »
Ignore

The Democrats are definitely going to have problems holding onto this one.

Bennet was a poor choice. John Salazar would've been much better from an electoral perspective. Though I think Ramanoff can win the general election, but he has to defeat the establishment candidate Bennet first.
Logged

JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2151


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -6.96

P P
View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2009, 01:52:19 pm »
Ignore

Hickenlooper would've been the smart choice. Salazar would have opened up a Republican-leaning House seat, and he's on the Appropriations committee so he probably wouldn't have left that anyway.
Logged
Karma Police
Evilmexicandictator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7136
Mexico


Political Matrix
E: -4.00, S: -5.57


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2009, 02:01:31 pm »
Ignore

I have to agree with Johnny, Hickenlooper would have been a great choice. I could see him holding onto the Denver suburban vote much, much better than Bennet would and of course Hickenlooper has a more appealing personality, at least from what I've seen.
Logged

JSojourner
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10756
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2009, 09:43:39 pm »
Ignore

Did I read somewhere that Hickenlooper turned down the job?  Or am I thinking of a mayor in another state?

Logged

Jari Askins for Gov 2010
BushOklahoma
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6287


Political Matrix
E: -5.35, S: +3.91

View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2009, 09:51:47 pm »
Ignore

I never really thought of Colorado being on a long-term Democratic trend.  I agree with EMD, this seat is really going to be tough to hold on to, especially with a weak incumbent.  I'm about to move this seat from toss-up to lean R pickup.
Logged

Economic score: -6.06
Social score: +2.09

Your score pegs you as economically leftist and socially centre-authoritarian
Lunar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20130
Ireland, Republic of

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2009, 10:09:37 pm »
Ignore

Romanoff probably won't go anywhere, the CO Democratic fundraising machine is very centralized and can cut off funding much easier than other states' parties.  

Also, Bennet supports the public option, the Democratic issue of the day.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2009, 10:11:44 pm by Lunar »Logged

hullo
Governor Vepres
Vepres
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3135
United States


Political Matrix
E: +4.26, S: -5.74

P P
View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2009, 01:04:48 pm »
Ignore

Romanoff probably won't go anywhere, the CO Democratic fundraising machine is very centralized and can cut off funding much easier than other states' parties.  

Also, Bennet supports the public option, the Democratic issue of the day.

Indeed, though Ramanoff would be a stronger candidate as well as a better Senator in general.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length
Logout


Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Forums Directory