Let's talk about jmfcst

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

At least I act toward newbies in the same way I act toward old posters.

Not really.

I love your work in things like international elections or creating new states, etc. but it seems that you got a compulsion of bullying any newbie or people like GPORTER, just because you have the necessity of being "funny".

Hmm. Unless I missing something, it's hard for me to believe Antonio is bullying anyone.

Just curious: would you like to cite some specific posts/discussion?

[Nym90]

Unlike feeble or The Roach, jmf is an old-timer.

So, he won't be banned.

Yeah, that's pretty much the story here. Do you think if jmfcts' account were only a few months old they would have pulled the whole "let him go to 100 infraction points then ban him for a few days and let him come back" routine?

If by "a few" you mean 30....

Jmfcst was definitely a tough case for me. I do look at a poster's entire history and the signal-to-noise ratio therein. So to that extent, yes, making several thousand quality posts does buy you more opportunities for redemption than a newbie would be afforded.

[Gustaf]

This is a ridiculous thread. Anyone who think Jmfcst would be automatically banned if he was new has got to be pretty clueless.

He gives a lot of insight into an important part of the US electorate and he is often quite entertaining. As opposed to the majority of the posters calling for his head.

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

This is a ridiculous thread. Anyone who think Jmfcst would be automatically banned if he was new has got to be pretty clueless.

He gives a lot of insight into an important part of the US electorate and he is often quite entertaining. As opposed to the majority of the posters calling for his head.

Pretty much jmfcst is the only representative of his political group in here.

[Vasall des Midas]

mods - next time, before you delete posts of mine, could you infract them before deleting them?  cause, when you simply delete them, I have no record of them, and so I end up with gaps in my Scrapbook of Precious Atlas Mementos. 

thanks

I approve of this post.

[Lief]

This is a ridiculous thread. Anyone who think Jmfcst would be automatically banned if he was new has got to be pretty clueless.

He gives a lot of insight into an important part of the US electorate and he is often quite entertaining. As opposed to the majority of the posters calling for his head.

Pretty much jmfcst is the only representative of his political group in here.

So was Stark...

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

This is a ridiculous thread. Anyone who think Jmfcst would be automatically banned if he was new has got to be pretty clueless.

He gives a lot of insight into an important part of the US electorate and he is often quite entertaining. As opposed to the majority of the posters calling for his head.

Pretty much jmfcst is the only representative of his political group in here.

So was Stark...

Of course arguments like "don't treat him like the others because he is the only [insert here]" is retarded.

Problem with jmf is that he's constantly trying to see how much he can do and get away with. Otherwise, he's pretty interesting poster.

[Senator Napoleon]

At least I act toward newbies in the same way I act toward old posters.

Not really.

I love your work in things like international elections or creating new states, etc. but it seems that you got a compulsion of bullying any newbie or people like GPORTER, just because you have the necessity of being "funny".

Hmm. Unless I missing something, it's hard for me to believe Antonio is bullying anyone.

Just curious: would you like to cite some specific posts/discussion?

Antonio is a bully. Get real.

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

At least I act toward newbies in the same way I act toward old posters.

Not really.

I love your work in things like international elections or creating new states, etc. but it seems that you got a compulsion of bullying any newbie or people like GPORTER, just because you have the necessity of being "funny".

Hmm. Unless I missing something, it's hard for me to believe Antonio is bullying anyone.

Just curious: would you like to cite some specific posts/discussion?

Antonio is a bully. Get real.

Napoleon. I consider both of you as friends, no matter how f**ked up your on-site relationship with Antonio (and vice versa) may be. But calling him a bully is a bit hyperbolic.

[Senator Napoleon]

At least I act toward newbies in the same way I act toward old posters.

Not really.

I love your work in things like international elections or creating new states, etc. but it seems that you got a compulsion of bullying any newbie or people like GPORTER, just because you have the necessity of being "funny".

Hmm. Unless I missing something, it's hard for me to believe Antonio is bullying anyone.

Just curious: would you like to cite some specific posts/discussion?

Antonio is a bully. Get real.

Napoleon. I consider both of you as friends, no matter how f**ked up your on-site relationship with Antonio (and vice versa) may be. But calling him a bully is a bit hyperbolic.

Really? I can't name a poster more rude than Antonio. Even Tmthforu has more likeable qualities than little Tony.

[Insula Dei]

Not that that's what this thread's about, but there are few words less fit to describe Antonio than 'bully'.

[Sibboleth]

Really? I can't name a poster more rude than Antonio

Not very observant, are you?

[King]

This is a ridiculous thread. Anyone who think Jmfcst would be automatically banned if he was new has got to be pretty clueless.

He gives a lot of insight into an important part of the US electorate and he is often quite entertaining. As opposed to the majority of the posters calling for his head.

Pretty much jmfcst is the only representative of his political group in here.

So was Stark...

Stark was a bump spammer.  That's worse than a neo-nazi.