Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 20, 2013, 04:22:05 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2012 Elections
(Moderators:
Mr. Morden
,
Bacon King
,
Big DaddyTX
)
Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate (Read 920 times)
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 24373
Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
on:
March 31, 2012, 06:15:34 pm »
I guess Rick
figured
that now that Newt is dead, giving the corpse some oxygen won't reanimate him, and he has more to fear from Mittens, so he is willing to go back into the debate ring, after previously joining Mittens in stiffing Newt and just saying no. Good call Rick.
Mittens no doubt will await developments before deciding. I doubt he will want to listen to Rick talking about him being Obama lite, and Romneycare = Obamacare, etc., unless he figures that the alternative of sending his regrets portends something even less pleasant, be it the resentment of Texas voters or whatever. Maybe he hopes that if he stalls, the debate without his presence will be cancelled. We shall see.
Logged
argentarius
YaBB God
Posts: 848
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #1 on:
March 31, 2012, 06:39:02 pm »
Santorum will be doing well if there still is a race by then. I think inevitability is finally catching on.
Logged
memphis
YaBB God
Posts: 12547
Political Matrix
E: -3.10, S: -3.83
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #2 on:
March 31, 2012, 06:43:31 pm »
I don't see how Mitt can pass. Telling a large state that you've already won and don't need their votes doesn't seem a wise move.
Logged
I'm JewCon in name only.
Klecly
YaBB God
Posts: 931
Political Matrix
E: 9.61, S: 6.52
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #3 on:
March 31, 2012, 06:48:30 pm »
Quote from: memphis on March 31, 2012, 06:43:31 pm
I don't see how Mitt can pass. Telling a large state that you've already won and don't need their votes doesn't seem a wise move.
Like John Sununu said "The significant people have already voted."
Logged
ChairmanSanchez
YaBB God
Posts: 8351
Political Matrix
E: 5.42, S: -1.39
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #4 on:
March 31, 2012, 07:18:04 pm »
Thank God! I miss the debates.
Logged
Thank You, Margaret Thatcher. You shall be missed.
jmc247
Jr. Member
Posts: 81
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #5 on:
March 31, 2012, 07:34:59 pm »
I don't see this debate as happening if they were demanding one before the April 24th races then perhaps. In fact that would be their smarter move.
If Romney rolls every state in April he is going to win NC, Oregon, Indiania and West Virginia. The only that could be in play for Santorum I suspect are Kentucky and Arkansas given the high evangelical population they have.
Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
Posts: 34271
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #6 on:
March 31, 2012, 11:11:30 pm »
good luck w that guys
Logged
"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"
registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
Posts: 36296
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #7 on:
March 31, 2012, 11:43:40 pm »
This is kind of silly. The race is over.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
YaBB God
Posts: 13927
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -2.61
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #8 on:
April 01, 2012, 12:36:42 am »
I highly doubt Mitt will attend.
Logged
jmc247
Jr. Member
Posts: 81
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #9 on:
April 01, 2012, 02:43:43 am »
Quote from: Eraserhead on March 31, 2012, 11:43:40 pm
This is kind of silly. The race is over.
Maybe they can ask for a second debate before Utah votes as well.
But, yah it's over.
Logged
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11593
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #10 on:
April 03, 2012, 02:45:59 am »
Quote from: Meeker on April 01, 2012, 12:36:42 am
I highly doubt Mitt will attend.
Logged
Quote from: bgwah on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 am
The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
Is JCL in mushy sappy love
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
YaBB God
Posts: 2835
Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.22
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #11 on:
April 03, 2012, 11:43:24 am »
Quote from: jmc247 on March 31, 2012, 07:34:59 pm
I don't see this debate as happening if they were demanding one before the April 24th races then perhaps. In fact that would be their smarter move.
If Romney rolls every state in April he is going to win NC, Oregon, Indiania and West Virginia. The only that could be in play for Santorum I suspect are Kentucky and Arkansas given the high evangelical population they have.
Indiana is in May. Plus I believe the Tea Party, Christian Conservatives, and Libertarians like me would beg to differ. Our sitting senator Luger is getting a pink slip and the Tea Party will gain another seat in the senate.
Logged
Senate Race 2012:
IN-Richard Mourdock
TX- Ted Cruz (R)
Governor Races
IN- Mike Pence (R)
Congressional Races
Jackie Walorski (R/IN-2)
Marlin Stutzman (R/IN-3)
Todd Rokita (R/IN-4)
Chard Reid (Lib/IN-5)
Luke Messer (R/IN-6)
Carlos May (R/IN-7)
Larry Bucshon (R/IN-8)
Todd Young (R/IN-9)
Tom Massie (R/KY-4)
Jayhawker
tmthforu94
YaBB God
Posts: 15917
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #12 on:
April 03, 2012, 11:45:19 am »
Quote from: Mideast Assemblyman JCL on April 03, 2012, 11:43:24 am
Quote from: jmc247 on March 31, 2012, 07:34:59 pm
I don't see this debate as happening if they were demanding one before the April 24th races then perhaps. In fact that would be their smarter move.
If Romney rolls every state in April he is going to win NC, Oregon, Indiania and West Virginia. The only that could be in play for Santorum I suspect are Kentucky and Arkansas given the high evangelical population they have.
Indiana is in May. Plus I believe the Tea Party, Christian Conservatives, and Libertarians like me would beg to differ. Our sitting senator Luger is getting a pink slip and the Tea Party will gain another seat in the senate.
It'll be close, but I think Lugar will hang on.
Indiana suburbs consist of a large portion of the GOP base in Indiana, and I expect them to vote comfortably for Senator Lugar. These same folks will vote for Governor Romney. Most Republicans I know (rural, conservative area) supported Santorum originally, but are now coming to terms with Romney and will vote for him only because they think we need to start focusing on the general election.
Logged
A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives.
-Jackie Robinson
Quote from: John_Engle on November 02, 2012, 04:25:37 pm
Tmthforu94
You are very kind my Friend. Thank you and God bless the people like You.
IDS Speaker Ben Kenobi
Ben Kenobi
YaBB God
Posts: 2577
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #13 on:
April 03, 2012, 11:47:22 am »
Quote
If Romney rolls every state in April he is going to win NC, Oregon, Indiania and West Virginia. The only that could be in play for Santorum I suspect are Kentucky and Arkansas given the high evangelical population they have.
How many times have you folks written Santorum off already?
Logged
Is JCL in mushy sappy love
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
YaBB God
Posts: 2835
Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: 0.22
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #14 on:
April 03, 2012, 08:34:34 pm »
Quote from: Tmthforu94 on April 03, 2012, 11:45:19 am
Quote from: Mideast Assemblyman JCL on April 03, 2012, 11:43:24 am
Quote from: jmc247 on March 31, 2012, 07:34:59 pm
I don't see this debate as happening if they were demanding one before the April 24th races then perhaps. In fact that would be their smarter move.
If Romney rolls every state in April he is going to win NC, Oregon, Indiania and West Virginia. The only that could be in play for Santorum I suspect are Kentucky and Arkansas given the high evangelical population they have.
Indiana is in May. Plus I believe the Tea Party, Christian Conservatives, and Libertarians like me would beg to differ. Our sitting senator Luger is getting a pink slip and the Tea Party will gain another seat in the senate.
It'll be close, but I think Lugar will hang on.
Indiana suburbs consist of a large portion of the GOP base in Indiana, and I expect them to vote comfortably for Senator Lugar. These same folks will vote for Governor Romney. Most Republicans I know (rural, conservative area) supported Santorum originally, but are now coming to terms with Romney and will vote for him only because they think we need to start focusing on the general election.
I'm confident Romney will not win Howard, Clinton, Tipton, Miami, Cass, Grant, or Tippacanoe counties. Ron Paul may win a county or two. I live in that rural, conservative area you spoke about and there's no love for Mitt amongst the grassroots. At a Tea Party PAC meeting I attended Romney was booed rather heavily. Paul, Santorum and a couple wash outs were cheered much more.
Logged
Senate Race 2012:
IN-Richard Mourdock
TX- Ted Cruz (R)
Governor Races
IN- Mike Pence (R)
Congressional Races
Jackie Walorski (R/IN-2)
Marlin Stutzman (R/IN-3)
Todd Rokita (R/IN-4)
Chard Reid (Lib/IN-5)
Luke Messer (R/IN-6)
Carlos May (R/IN-7)
Larry Bucshon (R/IN-8)
Todd Young (R/IN-9)
Tom Massie (R/KY-4)
Lloyd Bentsen's Ghost
independentTX
YaBB God
Posts: 1287
Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #15 on:
April 04, 2012, 06:50:39 pm »
Quote from: jmc247 on March 31, 2012, 07:34:59 pm
I don't see this debate as happening if they were demanding one before the April 24th races then perhaps. In fact that would be their smarter move.
If Romney rolls every state in April he is going to win NC, Oregon, Indiania and West Virginia. The only that could be in play for Santorum I suspect are Kentucky and Arkansas given the high evangelical population they have.
West Virginia is not Romney country at all, demographically. It's one of the poorest states in the country, has a very low percentage of college degree holders, and you know Santorum is going to basically walk around with a "MY GRANDDADDY WAS A COAL MINER" sign around his neck up there.
But at the same time, the only Republicans who get elected there tend to be moderates (Shelley Moore Capito), and they have a history of voting for wealthy blue-blood types (Jay Rockefeller, Gaston Caperton, etc).
Logged
LINCOLN REPUBLICAN
Winfield
YaBB God
Posts: 9832
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #16 on:
April 06, 2012, 11:38:24 am »
At this stage in the race, why would Romney want to spend more time getting attacked on stage by three losers?
It's over. Get on with the election.
Logged
jmc247
Jr. Member
Posts: 81
Re: Gingrich, Paul, and Santorum Agree to Texas GOP Debate
«
Reply #17 on:
April 06, 2012, 12:02:46 pm »
Quote
West Virginia is not Romney country at all, demographically. It's one of the poorest states in the country, has a very low percentage of college degree holders, and you know Santorum is going to basically walk around with a "MY GRANDDADDY WAS A COAL MINER" sign around his neck up there.
But at the same time, the only Republicans who get elected there tend to be moderates (Shelley Moore Capito), and they have a history of voting for wealthy blue-blood types (Jay Rockefeller, Gaston Caperton, etc).
Santorum's campaign messed up badly when it came time to register and set things up at the election board in West Virginia.
Quote
There's a reason the Santorum campaign didn't mention West Virginia in its delegate conference call last week
The main factor hurting Santorum, however, is the same problem his campaign has had elsewhere: ballot access. That is, ballot access not so much for him, but for him both statewide and in each of the congressional districts or with getting delegates on the ballot. In West Virginia, the problem is a combination of the two. Santorum is on the ballot, but like Illinois, that vote is meaningless. Primary voters in West Virginia on May 8 will also directly elect delegates -- both at-large and by congressional district.
There are 19 at-large delegate slots in West Virginia. Romney has filed 24 delegates, Gingrich 23 and Paul 19. Santorum has three delegates who his campaign has filed or have both filed and are committed to his candidacy.
Additionally, there are three delegate slots per each of the three West Virginia congressional districts. Romney has filed at least seven delegates in each of the districts, Gingrich has filed at least three delegates in each district (with double that number in one district and over triple the minimum in another), and Paul has filed the minimum full slate of three in each district. Santorum? Well, the former senator filed two delegates in the first congressional district and that is it.
He will not have Santorum delegates on the ballot for the congressional district spots in either the second or third congressional district.
http://frontloading.blogspot.com/2012/03/theres-reason-santorum-campaign-didnt.html
Santorum could sweep the state by a massive margin (which is unlikely given the state may be mostly rural, but candidates with money who spend on ads can win there) and even if he sweeps the state massively he at most can get five of the delegates.
Chances are because of the ballot screw up Santorum does not campaign there, Romney comes by once or twice and spends some money for ads in the three large urban areas of the state and wins in WV.
«
Last Edit: April 06, 2012, 12:05:05 pm by jmc247
»
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...