Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2013, 06:20:02 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Constitution and Law (Moderators: Emsworth, True Federalist)
| | |-+  Constitutionality of banning certain types of bullets
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Do you believe it is constitutional under the 2nd amendment to ban specific bullets?
Yes   -9 (64.3%)
No   -4 (28.6%)
Not sure   -1 (7.1%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 14

Author Topic: Constitutionality of banning certain types of bullets  (Read 629 times)
For Oklahoma
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17501
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.45, S: -7.57

View Profile
« on: March 31, 2012, 09:32:06 pm »
Ignore

I've been thinking about this...we hear about the pros and cons of gun control, but what about the bullet argument? Is it Constitutional to ban specific bullets that are viewed as too dangerous? I contend that it is on the grounds that it is not directly banning or restricting gun use.

What say you?
Logged
Proud Lieberal from Northeast
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35754


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2012, 12:09:35 pm »
Ignore

Well, I'm an amateur, but one can still bear arms. There's nothing about right to bullets Tongue
Logged

For Oklahoma
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17501
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.45, S: -7.57

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2012, 12:24:18 pm »
Ignore

Well, I'm an amateur, but one can still bear arms. There's nothing about right to bullets Tongue

That's what I say. It doesn't make explicitly clear about usage of bullets.
Logged
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19180
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2012, 08:01:53 pm »
Ignore

Thank Og they are easy to make heh?
Logged

Quote from:   Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
Yelnoc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6565
United States
View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2012, 08:34:33 pm »
Ignore

Neither the Constitution, nor the Bill of Rights mention bullets.  The federal government may regulate them as they please.
Logged

Goodbye
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21511
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2012, 11:00:40 pm »

Presuming that the usual weaseling idea that weapons with no military use are not protected (thereby justifying bans on sawed-off shotguns and switchblades) then banning explosive bullets would be constitutional.  There's a international treaty (possibly one of the Geneva's) that bans the use of them in war.
Logged

“Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.”
                Clinton Lee Scott

Read Fat Man on a Diet, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1682
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 02, 2012, 12:26:21 am »
Ignore

Perhaps it serves as an example of how the Constitution's contents have aged? Back then I don't expect there would have been much deliberation about the subject given that the lead balls could be produced by just about anyone with a campfire, pot, a basic hand-held tool and a little bit of know-how. With the advent of new technologies and with such remarkable social developments occurring over the years we end up having to grapple with many issues that the Founders likely could not have reasonably been expected to foresee and make prescriptions concerning - all the better I say that they left us with a legal framework for adapting to a world in constant change and means for amending the document if considered necessary by a substantial enough majority.
Logged

Social liberal with market socialist, sentiocentric, and cosmopolitan tendencies.
Political Matrix results on 13/2/2013: -1.16 (Economic), -8.00 (Social)
For Oklahoma
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17501
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.45, S: -7.57

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 02, 2012, 12:00:49 pm »
Ignore

Geez, this thread is green avatar central.
Logged
Proud Lieberal from Northeast
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35754


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: April 02, 2012, 01:24:44 pm »
Ignore



You don't need bullets for this!
Logged

retromike22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 768
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2012, 03:19:03 pm »
Ignore

I always thought, why don't they tax bullets?
Logged

My alternate history timeline: The Death of Strategist: 1988 Election and Beyond Altered. http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=152468.0
Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14227
United States Minor Outlying Islands


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2012, 07:23:42 pm »
Ignore

I always thought, why don't they tax bullets?

There is. Bullets have an 11% federal excise tax (in addition to state sales tax, of course, where applicable).
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory