World Leaders Survivor Redux - Organisation Thread
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 04:59:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  Survivor
  World Leaders Survivor Redux - Organisation Thread
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13
Author Topic: World Leaders Survivor Redux - Organisation Thread  (Read 113534 times)
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,059
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #150 on: May 26, 2009, 09:35:11 PM »

Dominican Republic has been democratic since at least the 70s. I still think going after Fernandez was kind of dumb though, because while he's not notable and I know nothing about him, his country is a bit less of a joke than those other Caribbean countries that don't even have populations with six digits, and there's still plenty of such leaders around. At least his country is something other than a joke tax haven.

As opposed to Canada, right?

There's basically three groups for most people:

1-People you actively dislike and want remove.
2-People who you don't actively like or dislike, but aren't really worth keeping around due to being from boring and/or joke countries.
3-People you actively like and would like to remain.

Fernandez and the others I'm referring to fall into group 2 for most people. Harper, for his voters and me, was group 1.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #151 on: May 27, 2009, 12:39:45 PM »

The twenty fourth round has completed, with five eliminated leaders, and five leaders gaining immunity:

Group One:

Serzh Sargsyan, Armenia: 9 votes
-----------------
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo: 4 votes, immune round 25
Rafael Correa, Ecuador: 1 vote

Group Two:


Pedro Pires, Cape Verde: 7 votes
----------------
David Thompson, Barbados: 5 votes, immune round 25
Michael Somare, Papua New Guinea: 2 votes
Ernest Bai Koroma, Sierra Leone: 1 vote

Group Three:


Alvaro Colom, Guatemala: 6.5 votes
---------------
Edward Natapei, Vanuatu: 6 votes, immune round 25
Sanjaagiin Bayar, Mongolia: 3 votes

Group Four:


Pakalitha Mosisili, Lesotho: 9 votes
--------------
Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, Argentina: 6 votes, immune round 25
Jan Peter Balkenende, Netherlands, The: 1 vote

Group Five:


Stephenson King, St Lucia: 8 votes
----------------
Derek Sikua, Solomon Islands: 3 votes, immune round 25
Yayi Boni, Benin: 2 votes
Patrick Manning, Trinidad and Tobago: 2 votes
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #152 on: May 27, 2009, 12:43:40 PM »

whoo we're getting close, finally Smiley (also mods, please sticky this thread)

I broke a tie in group 3, favouring a 'boring' neighbour (actually, Vanuatu has interesting politics) over a highly suspicious, bit less brown person. Call it affirmative action, if you like.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #153 on: May 29, 2009, 01:22:53 AM »

ughhh...night that was not meant to be a big night, was a big night. I'm now going to clean it all up.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #154 on: May 29, 2009, 04:27:24 AM »

The twenty fifth round has completed, with five eliminated leaders:

Group One:

Apisai Ielemia, Tuvalu: 9 votes
-----------------
Rafael Correa, Ecuador: 3 votes
Nikola Gruevski, Macedonia: 1 vote
Kostas Karamanlis, Greece: 1 vote
Martin Torrijos, Panama: 1 vote

Group Two:


Michael Somare, Papua New Guinea: 10 votes
----------------
Ernest Bai Koroma, Sierra Leone: 3 votes
Donald Tusk, Poland: 1 vote

Group Three:


Roosevelt Skerritt, Dominica: 10 votes
---------------
Evo Morales, Bolivia: 5 votes

Group Four:


Jigme Thinley, Bhutan: 8 votes
--------------
Baldwin Spencer, Antigua and Barbuda: 4 votes
Gordon Bajnal, Hungary: 1 vote
Jakaya Kikwete, Tanzania: 1 vote
Tuilaepa Aiono Sailele Malielegaoi, Samoa: 1 vote

Group Five:


Abdoulaye Wade, Senegal: 8 votes
----------------
Yayi Boni, Benin: 3 votes
Patrick Manning, Trinidad and Tobago: 3 votes
Brian Cowen, Ireland: 1 vote
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #155 on: May 29, 2009, 04:33:36 AM »

OK, so stage one is complete! Thanks everyone for giving me something to do other than my essays and being involved.

Stage two will start over the next couple of days; there will be two groups of 35 and they'll continue until there are ten in both groups, who will be our finalists.

Before we get to the second stage though, I need your advice on a few issues. This isn't a vote, just a general gage of opinion, if you like.

1) Are there any leaders who should be swapped over for someone else who has more power in their country? Have they left office, or maybe the PM is more important than the President?

2) Should there be no immunity at all, the ad-hoc current system, or first-in immunity every round? maybe something else?

3) Do you like the 'mess with the format' rounds? Any ideas for other ways to change it up a bit, or should they be left behind as a first stage thing?

4) Any other ideas to make this more fun?
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,189
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #156 on: May 29, 2009, 04:38:03 AM »

2) Should there be no immunity at all, the ad-hoc current system, or first-in immunity every round? maybe something else?

No, stop with immunity. Or at least a democratic immunity system : you vote for the one you want to protect next round.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #157 on: May 29, 2009, 04:45:08 AM »

I wanted to change my vote from Spencer to the Samoan guy after seeing that the attempt to save Thinley had failed, but the bracket was already locked. Sad
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #158 on: May 29, 2009, 04:47:00 AM »

1) Are there any leaders who should be swapped over for someone else who has more power in their country? Have they left office, or maybe the PM is more important than the President?
Too late now. Nobody should be swapped.
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
I rather enjoyed the occasional weird rules (including the silly different immunities). Nothing of the kind for the final 20, though, please.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #159 on: May 29, 2009, 04:49:10 AM »

I wanted to change my vote from Spencer to the Samoan guy after seeing that the attempt to save Thinley had failed, but the bracket was already locked. Sad

To be fair, the booth was open about an extra 12 hours than it should've been Smiley
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,347
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #160 on: May 29, 2009, 04:50:40 AM »

I'm against immunity and the silly rules.
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,344
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #161 on: May 29, 2009, 05:10:15 AM »
« Edited: May 29, 2009, 05:58:20 AM by big bad fab »

1) After having thought about it (yes, I'm still able to, at least a bit !):
No change of leaders now, even if in 3 countries, leaders have changed. It's too late to decide this.

2) No immunity at all, it produces too many imbalances from one round to another.

3) 4)
- Being able to split your vote (0,5-0,5) hasn't been a success, so let's drop this idea OR ELSE it should become compulsory for everyone to split his vote, in order to avoid almost everybody to vote with an entire vote.

- In case of a par between 2 leaders, why not decide it with a small vote just opened to those who voted for another leader ? That's just an idea, I'm not convinced myself.

- Maybe a round where you eject 2 leaders, voters having each 2 votes and you use a preferential system to decide. A bit complicated to organize maybe, but still democratic and very interesting I think.

- Maybe a round where each voter can decide if he wants to vote in each group or if he wants not to vote in one group, just to have 2 votes in the other. I think that would be a big idea, since it remains democratic but still entails some suspense...
Logged
GMantis
Dessie Potter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,001
Bulgaria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #162 on: May 29, 2009, 05:15:13 AM »

I think it's too late for change.
I'm also against immunity and other variant rules - it's too disruptive.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,998
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #163 on: May 29, 2009, 07:43:46 AM »

The Pope should have been included.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,059
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #164 on: May 29, 2009, 10:39:49 AM »

Anyone who's no longer in office should be swapped, but just then.

I also don't mind the odd rounds, though I agree, none of that for the final 20.
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,344
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #165 on: May 29, 2009, 01:45:58 PM »

Anyone who's no longer in office should be swapped, but just then.
I disagree, as IF they have been swapped during the first phase, we may have voted in order to oust the new leader sooner.

Just imagine Dave Cameron replacing Gordon Brown before the end of this Survivor:
you would be a bit angry to have him just in the end, because you don't drop Brown before...
And I would agree that Cameron wouldn't deserve to be in.
Or Obama assassinated and Biden replacing him. Even me, I'd prefer to have Obama on the list.
That would be a posthumous victory.
Or Mali's president dislodged by a military coup: I'd prefer to let the democrat in.

I was the first to ask this question of replacements, but I've reached the conclusion it's not fair to replace.
Maybe you'd voted for the new Panama's president whereas you didn't vote for Torrijos, for example.
Logged
big bad fab
filliatre
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,344
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #166 on: May 29, 2009, 01:48:09 PM »

- Maybe a round where each voter can decide if he wants to vote in each group or if he wants not to vote in one group, just to have 2 votes in the other. I think that would be a big idea, since it remains democratic but still entails some suspense...

May I add that this idea is especially big (I think) because there are only 2 groups left.
It's a really democratic uncertainty.
And we need to be both fair and suspenseful ! Wink
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #167 on: May 29, 2009, 04:19:03 PM »

No switching please. I don't really see the point in doing that to be honest. A person can be a great world leader even if they don't happen to hold office any longer.

No first-poster immunity. That was one of the worse things of the last game. It throws things off way too much. I'm generally opposed to immunity, to be honest.

Also, while I'm not completely adverse to the rules variants it shouldn't be made to throw the game off (allowing vote splits had that effect a little bit, giving immunity to those with many votes as well). And I concur with others that it should definitely be just straight votes for the final 20.
Logged
GMantis
Dessie Potter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,001
Bulgaria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #168 on: May 31, 2009, 11:08:28 AM »

Here's an update to the map after the 25th round.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,779


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #169 on: June 01, 2009, 04:19:31 AM »

Kikwete, Bayar, Correa, Morales, Garcia and Arroyo are top of my list right now.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #170 on: June 01, 2009, 01:54:46 PM »
« Edited: June 03, 2009, 07:43:11 PM by Ernest »

Total votes as of the end of round 25 for those still surviving.  The top vote getter so far is the departed Hugo Chavez, Venezuela with 38 votes.  It looks like the vote getters are mostly ending up in Group A, with 10 so far in Group B compared to 17 so far in Group A, including the top vote getter of each group.

G1
(A) Rafael Correa, Ecuador: 10 votes
(B) Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, Philippines, The: 5 votes
(A) Nikola Gruevski, Macedonia: 1 vote
(A) Kostas Karamanlis, Greece: 1 vote
(A) Martin Torrijos, Panama: 1 vote

G2
(A) Ernest Bai Koroma, Sierra Leone: 8.5 votes
(A) David Thompson. Barbados: 7.5 votes
(B) Angela Merkel, Germany: 1 vote
(A) Lars Lokke Rasmussen, Denmark: 1 vote
(B) Donald Tusk, Poland: 1 vote

G3
(A) Evo Morales, Bolivia: 32.5 votes
(B) Gordon Brown, United Kingdom: 10 votes
(A) Sanjaagiin Bayar, Mongolia: 7.5 votes
(B) Edward Natapei, Vanuatu: 6 votes
(A) Alan Garcia, Peru: 2 votes
(A) Lawrence Gonzi, Malta: 1 vote
(A) Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Brazil: 1 vote
(A) Manny Mori, Micronesia: 1 vote

G4
(A) Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, Argentina: 31 votes
(A) Baldwin Spencer, Antigua and Barbuda: 5 votes
(B) Mohamed Nasheed, Maldives: 4 votes
(B) Mirko Cvetkovic, Serbia: 2 votes
(A) Jan Peter Balkenende, Netherlands, The: 1 vote
(B) Gordon Bajnal, Hungary: 1 vote
(B) Jakaya Kikwete, Tanzania: 1 vote
(B) Fernando Lugo, Paraguay: 1 vote
(A) Tuilaepa Aiono Sailele Malielegaoi, Samoa: 1 vote

G5
Yayi Boni, Benin: 18.5 votes
Derek Sikua, Solomon Islands: 10 votes
Patrick Manning, Trinidad and Tobago: 5 votes
Brian Cowen, Ireland: 4.5 votes
Litokwa Tomeing, Marshall Islands: 2.5 votes
Hans-Rudolf Merz, Switzerland: 2 votes

Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #171 on: June 05, 2009, 03:01:54 AM »

OK, the second stage will shart very shortly.

The leaders will not change; and every second round will be either immunity or messing with the format, but in stage three there will be neither. Immunity will always be determined by the round in which it is offerred, and mostly on a 'first poster' basis, but it won't be possible to determine immunity in both groups. The 'messing with the format' rounds will take on various styles, potentially including the suggestions received here.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #172 on: June 05, 2009, 03:46:24 AM »

Stage Twp Gropups are posted at the beginning of this thread.
Logged
GMantis
Dessie Potter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,001
Bulgaria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #173 on: June 05, 2009, 04:29:57 AM »

Here's a map of the second stage. Red is group 1, green is group 2.



Hm... Are you quite sure you selected the groups randomly, Hughento? Smiley
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #174 on: June 05, 2009, 04:43:43 AM »

I used random.org; so yes. It's a biot of a shame that there aqre mnultiple biases, but I suppose if there weren't at least a few it'd be unfair because of it's non-rtandomness, so... :S
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.077 seconds with 12 queries.