Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Autauga	Bedford	33.3%
	Sessions	64.2%
	Other	2.5%

Baldwin	Bedford	28.6%
	Sessions	68.9%
	Other	2.6%

Barbour	Bedford	53.1%
	Sessions	45.7%
	Other	1.2%

Bibb	Bedford	49.0%
	Sessions	49.2%
	Other	1.8%

Blount	Bedford	37.0%
	Sessions	62.4%
	Other	0.6%

Bullock	Bedford	68.4%
	Sessions	28.9%
	Other	2.7%

Butler	Bedford	50.1%
	Sessions	48.1%
	Other	1.8%

Calhoun	Bedford	44.5%
	Sessions	52.9%
	Other	2.6%

Chambers	Bedford	49.4%
	Sessions	48.6%
	Other	2.0%

Cherokee	Bedford	58.2%
	Sessions	39.0%
	Other	2.8%

Chilton	Bedford	39.7%
	Sessions	58.2%
	Other	2.1%

Choctaw	Bedford	56.7%
	Sessions	42.2%
	Other	1.1%

Clarke	Bedford	48.5%
	Sessions	50.7%
	Other	0.8%

Clay	Bedford	46.3%
	Sessions	51.1%
	Other	2.6%

Cleburne	Bedford	41.6%
	Sessions	54.6%
	Other	3.8%

Coffee	Bedford	41.4%
	Sessions	56.0%
	Other	2.6%

Colbert	Bedford	61.5%
	Sessions	37.1%
	Other	1.4%

Conecuh	Bedford	55.2%
	Sessions	43.1%
	Other	1.8%

Coosa	Bedford	52.9%
	Sessions	45.0%
	Other	2.1%

Covington	Bedford	40.8%
	Sessions	56.2%
	Other	3.0%

Crenshaw	Bedford	50.3%
	Sessions	48.3%
	Other	1.3%

Cullman	Bedford	43.3%
	Sessions	53.4%
	Other	3.3%

Dale	Bedford	40.4%
	Sessions	57.6%
	Other	2.0%

Dallas	Bedford	58.5%
	Sessions	40.2%
	Other	1.3%

DeKalb	Bedford	41.8%
	Sessions	56.1%
	Other	2.1%

Elmore	Bedford	32.9%
	Sessions	64.4%
	Other	2.7%

Escambia	Bedford	42.8%
	Sessions	53.8%
	Other	3.3%

Etowah	Bedford	52.8%
	Sessions	45.4%
	Other	1.9%

Fayette	Bedford	52.1%
	Sessions	46.0%
	Other	1.9%

Franklin	Bedford	64.7%
	Sessions	34.0%
	Other	1.3%

Geneva	Bedford	45.4%
	Sessions	51.7%
	Other	2.9%

Greene	Bedford	78.6%
	Sessions	20.2%
	Other	1.2%

Hale	Bedford	64.2%
	Sessions	34.8%
	Other	1.0%

Henry	Bedford	49.1%
	Sessions	49.3%
	Other	1.6%

Houston	Bedford	36.6%
	Sessions	61.9%
	Other	1.5%

Jackson	Bedford	57.8%
	Sessions	39.8%
	Other	2.4%

Jefferson	Bedford	46.8%
	Sessions	51.3%
	Other	1.8%

Lamar	Bedford	57.9%
	Sessions	40.3%
	Other	1.8%

Lauderdale	Bedford	53.9%
	Sessions	44.3%
	Other	1.8%

Lawrence	Bedford	63.0%
	Sessions	35.3%
	Other	1.7%

Lee	Bedford	37.5%
	Sessions	58.7%
	Other	3.8%

Limestone	Bedford	43.4%
	Sessions	54.5%
	Other	2.1%

Lowndes	Bedford	72.0%
	Sessions	26.2%
	Other	1.8%

Macon	Bedford	85.6%
	Sessions	12.7%
	Other	1.8%

Madison	Bedford	42.2%
	Sessions	55.0%
	Other	2.7%

Marengo	Bedford	54.0%
	Sessions	44.4%
	Other	1.6%

Marion	Bedford	57.4%
	Sessions	41.0%
	Other	1.5%

Marshall	Bedford	42.9%
	Sessions	54.9%
	Other	2.2%

Mobile	Bedford	41.6%
	Sessions	56.4%
	Other	2.0%

Monroe	Bedford	43.4%
	Sessions	55.6%
	Other	1.0%

Montgomery	Bedford	47.4%
	Sessions	50.3%
	Other	2.2%

Morgan	Bedford	41.4%
	Sessions	56.1%
	Other	2.5%

Perry	Bedford	68.5%
	Sessions	30.4%
	Other	1.1%

Pickens	Bedford	55.4%
	Sessions	43.0%
	Other	1.5%

Pike	Bedford	45.7%
	Sessions	52.9%
	Other	1.4%

Randolph	Bedford	44.8%
	Sessions	53.1%
	Other	2.1%

Russell	Bedford	57.2%
	Sessions	40.5%
	Other	2.2%

St. Clair	Bedford	33.6%
	Sessions	64.3%
	Other	2.2%

Shelby	Bedford	23.1%
	Sessions	74.7%
	Other	2.2%

Sumter	Bedford	72.6%
	Sessions	26.5%
	Other	0.9%

Talladega	Bedford	48.0%
	Sessions	50.4%
	Other	1.6%

Tallapoosa	Bedford	43.3%
	Sessions	54.6%
	Other	2.2%

Tuscaloosa	Bedford	45.1%
	Sessions	52.7%
	Other	2.3%

Walker	Bedford	58.5%
	Sessions	39.9%
	Other	1.6%

Washington	Bedford	54.9%
	Sessions	43.4%
	Other	1.7%

Wilcox	Bedford	65.2%
	Sessions	34.0%
	Other	0.7%

Winston	Bedford	44.6%
	Sessions	53.9%
	Other	1.5%

National DataGraph for 1996 - Alabama Results for 1996

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved