Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adair	Workman	24.0%
	Lankford	70.8%
	Braddy	1.7%
	Other	3.5%

Alfalfa	Workman	7.5%
	Lankford	87.6%
	Braddy	1.1%
	Other	3.8%

Atoka	Workman	24.1%
	Lankford	69.9%
	Braddy	2.3%
	Other	3.7%

Beaver	Workman	7.6%
	Lankford	87.3%
	Braddy	1.2%
	Other	3.9%

Beckham	Workman	11.5%
	Lankford	83.6%
	Braddy	1.9%
	Other	3.0%

Blaine	Workman	14.5%
	Lankford	80.1%
	Braddy	1.9%
	Other	3.5%

Bryan	Workman	21.8%
	Lankford	70.4%
	Braddy	2.9%
	Other	4.8%

Caddo	Workman	21.1%
	Lankford	73.8%
	Braddy	1.8%
	Other	3.3%

Canadian	Workman	16.3%
	Lankford	76.2%
	Braddy	2.4%
	Other	5.1%

Carter	Workman	21.9%
	Lankford	70.4%
	Braddy	2.7%
	Other	5.0%

Cherokee	Workman	32.0%
	Lankford	60.2%
	Braddy	2.4%
	Other	5.3%

Choctaw	Workman	24.1%
	Lankford	69.5%
	Braddy	2.0%
	Other	4.4%

Cimarron	Workman	7.2%
	Lankford	84.9%
	Braddy	1.9%
	Other	5.9%

Cleveland	Workman	26.6%
	Lankford	61.9%
	Braddy	6.0%
	Other	5.6%

Coal	Workman	26.6%
	Lankford	66.1%
	Braddy	2.6%
	Other	4.7%

Comanche	Workman	29.8%
	Lankford	61.7%
	Braddy	3.2%
	Other	5.3%

Cotton	Workman	15.0%
	Lankford	78.1%
	Braddy	2.0%
	Other	4.9%

Craig	Workman	21.4%
	Lankford	73.3%
	Braddy	1.5%
	Other	3.8%

Creek	Workman	18.3%
	Lankford	75.2%
	Braddy	2.0%
	Other	4.5%

Custer	Workman	15.4%
	Lankford	78.9%
	Braddy	1.8%
	Other	3.9%

Delaware	Workman	21.2%
	Lankford	73.1%
	Braddy	1.9%
	Other	3.8%

Dewey	Workman	8.3%
	Lankford	88.3%
	Braddy	1.3%
	Other	2.1%

Ellis	Workman	7.4%
	Lankford	88.4%
	Braddy	1.3%
	Other	3.0%

Garfield	Workman	15.7%
	Lankford	77.3%
	Braddy	2.5%
	Other	4.4%

Garvin	Workman	16.0%
	Lankford	77.8%
	Braddy	2.2%
	Other	4.0%

Grady	Workman	14.5%
	Lankford	79.4%
	Braddy	2.0%
	Other	4.1%

Grant	Workman	9.4%
	Lankford	85.2%
	Braddy	1.5%
	Other	3.9%

Greer	Workman	16.9%
	Lankford	78.0%
	Braddy	1.2%
	Other	3.9%

Harmon	Workman	19.4%
	Lankford	76.8%
	Braddy	0.7%
	Other	3.0%

Harper	Workman	6.4%
	Lankford	89.7%
	Braddy	1.0%
	Other	2.8%

Haskell	Workman	23.4%
	Lankford	72.1%
	Braddy	1.7%
	Other	2.7%

Hughes	Workman	19.8%
	Lankford	75.1%
	Braddy	1.9%
	Other	3.3%

Jackson	Workman	15.8%
	Lankford	78.2%
	Braddy	1.9%
	Other	4.1%

Jefferson	Workman	18.9%
	Lankford	74.7%
	Braddy	2.3%
	Other	4.1%

Johnston	Workman	25.5%
	Lankford	67.3%
	Braddy	2.6%
	Other	4.6%

Kay	Workman	18.8%
	Lankford	73.6%
	Braddy	2.5%
	Other	5.0%

Kingfisher	Workman	8.6%
	Lankford	86.9%
	Braddy	1.6%
	Other	3.0%

Kiowa	Workman	18.2%
	Lankford	78.0%
	Braddy	1.6%
	Other	2.2%

Latimer	Workman	24.2%
	Lankford	70.1%
	Braddy	2.1%
	Other	3.7%

Le Flore	Workman	24.0%
	Lankford	68.8%
	Braddy	2.3%
	Other	4.9%

Lincoln	Workman	14.3%
	Lankford	79.7%
	Braddy	1.9%
	Other	4.1%

Logan	Workman	17.5%
	Lankford	74.9%
	Braddy	2.0%
	Other	5.6%

Love	Workman	23.0%
	Lankford	69.9%
	Braddy	2.3%
	Other	4.8%

McClain	Workman	14.2%
	Lankford	79.7%
	Braddy	2.1%
	Other	4.0%

McCurtain	Workman	22.4%
	Lankford	70.7%
	Braddy	3.1%
	Other	3.8%

McIntosh	Workman	27.4%
	Lankford	67.0%
	Braddy	2.0%
	Other	3.6%

Major	Workman	6.6%
	Lankford	89.0%
	Braddy	1.4%
	Other	2.9%

Marshall	Workman	22.1%
	Lankford	70.5%
	Braddy	2.4%
	Other	5.1%

Mayes	Workman	21.8%
	Lankford	72.3%
	Braddy	1.9%
	Other	4.0%

Murray	Workman	18.2%
	Lankford	75.7%
	Braddy	1.7%
	Other	4.4%

Muskogee	Workman	31.0%
	Lankford	62.9%
	Braddy	2.1%
	Other	4.0%

Noble	Workman	15.7%
	Lankford	78.8%
	Braddy	1.5%
	Other	4.1%

Nowata	Workman	20.1%
	Lankford	74.0%
	Braddy	1.7%
	Other	4.3%

Okfuskee	Workman	23.1%
	Lankford	71.3%
	Braddy	1.7%
	Other	3.9%

Oklahoma	Workman	32.5%
	Lankford	58.5%
	Braddy	3.4%
	Other	5.6%

Okmulgee	Workman	29.3%
	Lankford	64.3%
	Braddy	2.3%
	Other	4.1%

Osage	Workman	27.2%
	Lankford	66.0%
	Braddy	2.3%
	Other	4.4%

Ottawa	Workman	26.4%
	Lankford	65.9%
	Braddy	2.5%
	Other	5.1%

Pawnee	Workman	19.6%
	Lankford	73.6%
	Braddy	1.8%
	Other	5.0%

Payne	Workman	24.9%
	Lankford	65.7%
	Braddy	2.9%
	Other	6.5%

Pittsburg	Workman	24.1%
	Lankford	69.4%
	Braddy	2.4%
	Other	4.1%

Pontotoc	Workman	24.0%
	Lankford	68.9%
	Braddy	2.7%
	Other	4.4%

Pottawatomie	Workman	18.2%
	Lankford	75.2%
	Braddy	2.3%
	Other	4.3%

Pushmataha	Workman	22.4%
	Lankford	70.5%
	Braddy	2.7%
	Other	4.4%

Roger Mills	Workman	8.2%
	Lankford	88.0%
	Braddy	0.9%
	Other	2.9%

Rogers	Workman	16.8%
	Lankford	76.5%
	Braddy	2.1%
	Other	4.5%

Seminole	Workman	20.8%
	Lankford	73.3%
	Braddy	2.0%
	Other	4.0%

Sequoyah	Workman	25.8%
	Lankford	66.9%
	Braddy	2.7%
	Other	4.6%

Stephens	Workman	15.6%
	Lankford	79.1%
	Braddy	1.7%
	Other	3.6%

Texas	Workman	13.4%
	Lankford	78.7%
	Braddy	2.3%
	Other	5.6%

Tillman	Workman	21.6%
	Lankford	72.7%
	Braddy	2.1%
	Other	3.6%

Tulsa	Workman	29.4%
	Lankford	62.7%
	Braddy	2.6%
	Other	5.3%

Wagoner	Workman	19.4%
	Lankford	74.2%
	Braddy	1.9%
	Other	4.5%

Washington	Workman	19.0%
	Lankford	74.1%
	Braddy	1.8%
	Other	5.0%

Washita	Workman	11.4%
	Lankford	84.2%
	Braddy	1.2%
	Other	3.2%

Woods	Workman	11.1%
	Lankford	83.4%
	Braddy	1.5%
	Other	4.0%

Woodward	Workman	10.0%
	Lankford	84.8%
	Braddy	1.4%
	Other	3.9%

National DataGraph for 2016 - Oklahoma Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved