Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Autauga		0.0%
	Boozer	87.3%
		0.0%
	Other	12.7%

Baldwin		0.0%
	Boozer	88.0%
		0.0%
	Other	12.0%

Barbour		0.0%
	Boozer	86.0%
		0.0%
	Other	14.0%

Bibb		0.0%
	Boozer	90.4%
		0.0%
	Other	9.6%

Blount		0.0%
	Boozer	93.2%
		0.0%
	Other	6.8%

Bullock		0.0%
	Boozer	72.6%
		0.0%
	Other	27.4%

Butler		0.0%
	Boozer	87.8%
		0.0%
	Other	12.2%

Calhoun		0.0%
	Boozer	86.1%
		0.0%
	Other	13.9%

Chambers		0.0%
	Boozer	84.8%
		0.0%
	Other	15.2%

Cherokee		0.0%
	Boozer	93.8%
		0.0%
	Other	6.2%

Chilton		0.0%
	Boozer	92.8%
		0.0%
	Other	7.2%

Choctaw		0.0%
	Boozer	82.3%
		0.0%
	Other	17.7%

Clarke		0.0%
	Boozer	89.7%
		0.0%
	Other	10.3%

Clay		0.0%
	Boozer	92.7%
		0.0%
	Other	7.3%

Cleburne		0.0%
	Boozer	94.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.6%

Coffee		0.0%
	Boozer	90.1%
		0.0%
	Other	9.9%

Colbert		0.0%
	Boozer	87.4%
		0.0%
	Other	12.6%

Conecuh		0.0%
	Boozer	87.1%
		0.0%
	Other	12.9%

Coosa		0.0%
	Boozer	86.9%
		0.0%
	Other	13.1%

Covington		0.0%
	Boozer	93.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.3%

Crenshaw		0.0%
	Boozer	92.1%
		0.0%
	Other	7.9%

Cullman		0.0%
	Boozer	93.3%
		0.0%
	Other	6.7%

Dale		0.0%
	Boozer	88.5%
		0.0%
	Other	11.5%

Dallas		0.0%
	Boozer	72.5%
		0.0%
	Other	27.5%

DeKalb		0.0%
	Boozer	93.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.3%

Elmore		0.0%
	Boozer	89.0%
		0.0%
	Other	11.0%

Escambia		0.0%
	Boozer	90.0%
		0.0%
	Other	10.0%

Etowah		0.0%
	Boozer	90.1%
		0.0%
	Other	9.9%

Fayette		0.0%
	Boozer	93.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.1%

Franklin		0.0%
	Boozer	92.6%
		0.0%
	Other	7.4%

Geneva		0.0%
	Boozer	93.6%
		0.0%
	Other	6.4%

Greene		0.0%
	Boozer	71.0%
		0.0%
	Other	29.0%

Hale		0.0%
	Boozer	80.8%
		0.0%
	Other	19.2%

Henry		0.0%
	Boozer	88.2%
		0.0%
	Other	11.8%

Houston		0.0%
	Boozer	87.1%
		0.0%
	Other	12.9%

Jackson		0.0%
	Boozer	92.5%
		0.0%
	Other	7.5%

Jefferson		0.0%
	Boozer	73.6%
		0.0%
	Other	26.4%

Lamar		0.0%
	Boozer	94.9%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Lauderdale		0.0%
	Boozer	87.3%
		0.0%
	Other	12.7%

Lawrence		0.0%
	Boozer	88.3%
		0.0%
	Other	11.7%

Lee		0.0%
	Boozer	82.5%
		0.0%
	Other	17.5%

Limestone		0.0%
	Boozer	83.7%
		0.0%
	Other	16.3%

Lowndes		0.0%
	Boozer	73.6%
		0.0%
	Other	26.4%

Macon		0.0%
	Boozer	53.5%
		0.0%
	Other	46.5%

Madison		0.0%
	Boozer	74.1%
		0.0%
	Other	25.9%

Marengo		0.0%
	Boozer	83.3%
		0.0%
	Other	16.7%

Marion		0.0%
	Boozer	94.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Marshall		0.0%
	Boozer	92.0%
		0.0%
	Other	8.0%

Mobile		0.0%
	Boozer	78.5%
		0.0%
	Other	21.5%

Monroe		0.0%
	Boozer	86.8%
		0.0%
	Other	13.2%

Montgomery		0.0%
	Boozer	68.4%
		0.0%
	Other	31.6%

Morgan		0.0%
	Boozer	88.0%
		0.0%
	Other	12.0%

Perry		0.0%
	Boozer	71.0%
		0.0%
	Other	29.0%

Pickens		0.0%
	Boozer	84.7%
		0.0%
	Other	15.3%

Pike		0.0%
	Boozer	86.5%
		0.0%
	Other	13.5%

Randolph		0.0%
	Boozer	93.4%
		0.0%
	Other	6.6%

Russell		0.0%
	Boozer	75.0%
		0.0%
	Other	25.0%

St. Clair		0.0%
	Boozer	90.5%
		0.0%
	Other	9.5%

Shelby		0.0%
	Boozer	84.1%
		0.0%
	Other	15.9%

Sumter		0.0%
	Boozer	78.8%
		0.0%
	Other	21.2%

Talladega		0.0%
	Boozer	86.9%
		0.0%
	Other	13.1%

Tallapoosa		0.0%
	Boozer	91.7%
		0.0%
	Other	8.3%

Tuscaloosa		0.0%
	Boozer	82.5%
		0.0%
	Other	17.5%

Walker		0.0%
	Boozer	91.8%
		0.0%
	Other	8.2%

Washington		0.0%
	Boozer	91.9%
		0.0%
	Other	8.1%

Wilcox		0.0%
	Boozer	83.9%
		0.0%
	Other	16.1%

Winston		0.0%
	Boozer	94.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.7%

National DataGraph for 2022 - Alabama Results for 2022

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved