Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2023-05-05

Map

Map

Allen	DeCoursey	44.0%
	Crutcher	53.9%
	Other	2.1%

Anderson	DeCoursey	45.6%
	Crutcher	52.9%
	Other	1.4%

Atchison	DeCoursey	49.9%
	Crutcher	48.4%
	Other	1.8%

Barber	DeCoursey	41.9%
	Crutcher	56.6%
	Other	1.4%

Barton	DeCoursey	48.3%
	Crutcher	49.6%
	Other	2.2%

Bourbon	DeCoursey	43.5%
	Crutcher	54.1%
	Other	2.4%

Brown	DeCoursey	32.2%
	Crutcher	66.5%
	Other	1.3%

Butler	DeCoursey	52.1%
	Crutcher	45.5%
	Other	2.3%

Chase	DeCoursey	42.5%
	Crutcher	55.9%
	Other	1.7%

Chautauqua	DeCoursey	32.8%
	Crutcher	65.5%
	Other	1.7%

Cherokee	DeCoursey	51.6%
	Crutcher	46.3%
	Other	2.0%

Cheyenne	DeCoursey	33.3%
	Crutcher	64.0%
	Other	2.7%

Clark	DeCoursey	37.7%
	Crutcher	59.9%
	Other	2.5%

Clay	DeCoursey	28.4%
	Crutcher	68.4%
	Other	3.1%

Cloud	DeCoursey	43.4%
	Crutcher	53.8%
	Other	2.8%

Coffey	DeCoursey	40.4%
	Crutcher	57.6%
	Other	2.0%

Comanche	DeCoursey	35.0%
	Crutcher	63.1%
	Other	1.9%

Cowley	DeCoursey	51.6%
	Crutcher	45.7%
	Other	2.7%

Crawford	DeCoursey	50.1%
	Crutcher	47.5%
	Other	2.4%

Decatur	DeCoursey	43.7%
	Crutcher	54.6%
	Other	1.7%

Dickinson	DeCoursey	38.0%
	Crutcher	59.8%
	Other	2.2%

Doniphan	DeCoursey	34.7%
	Crutcher	63.7%
	Other	1.6%

Douglas	DeCoursey	44.7%
	Crutcher	53.3%
	Other	2.0%

Edwards	DeCoursey	40.0%
	Crutcher	58.9%
	Other	1.1%

Elk	DeCoursey	39.5%
	Crutcher	57.3%
	Other	3.1%

Ellis	DeCoursey	61.0%
	Crutcher	37.1%
	Other	1.9%

Ellsworth	DeCoursey	46.8%
	Crutcher	52.0%
	Other	1.2%

Finney	DeCoursey	45.2%
	Crutcher	52.9%
	Other	1.9%

Ford	DeCoursey	51.9%
	Crutcher	45.9%
	Other	2.2%

Franklin	DeCoursey	43.4%
	Crutcher	53.2%
	Other	3.4%

Geary	DeCoursey	45.8%
	Crutcher	49.4%
	Other	4.7%

Gove	DeCoursey	48.3%
	Crutcher	49.4%
	Other	2.3%

Graham	DeCoursey	41.5%
	Crutcher	55.1%
	Other	3.3%

Grant	DeCoursey	42.1%
	Crutcher	55.6%
	Other	2.2%

Gray	DeCoursey	44.7%
	Crutcher	53.3%
	Other	2.0%

Greeley	DeCoursey	31.7%
	Crutcher	66.2%
	Other	2.1%

Greenwood	DeCoursey	38.2%
	Crutcher	58.9%
	Other	2.9%

Hamilton	DeCoursey	42.5%
	Crutcher	54.4%
	Other	3.1%

Harper	DeCoursey	37.7%
	Crutcher	58.6%
	Other	3.7%

Harvey	DeCoursey	45.1%
	Crutcher	53.7%
	Other	1.3%

Haskell	DeCoursey	44.5%
	Crutcher	53.5%
	Other	2.0%

Hodgeman	DeCoursey	37.9%
	Crutcher	60.5%
	Other	1.5%

Jackson	DeCoursey	40.1%
	Crutcher	57.2%
	Other	2.7%

Jefferson	DeCoursey	44.2%
	Crutcher	51.5%
	Other	4.3%

Jewell	DeCoursey	30.8%
	Crutcher	64.3%
	Other	4.9%

Johnson	DeCoursey	45.2%
	Crutcher	53.1%
	Other	1.6%

Kearny	DeCoursey	41.1%
	Crutcher	57.3%
	Other	1.7%

Kingman	DeCoursey	45.1%
	Crutcher	52.4%
	Other	2.5%

Kiowa	DeCoursey	33.7%
	Crutcher	64.0%
	Other	2.3%

Labette	DeCoursey	49.4%
	Crutcher	46.3%
	Other	4.3%

Lane	DeCoursey	38.5%
	Crutcher	59.8%
	Other	1.7%

Leavenworth	DeCoursey	48.8%
	Crutcher	46.4%
	Other	4.9%

Lincoln	DeCoursey	36.7%
	Crutcher	60.2%
	Other	3.2%

Linn	DeCoursey	37.5%
	Crutcher	60.4%
	Other	2.1%

Logan	DeCoursey	39.7%
	Crutcher	56.9%
	Other	3.4%

Lyon	DeCoursey	49.2%
	Crutcher	48.5%
	Other	2.3%

McPherson	DeCoursey	39.0%
	Crutcher	58.3%
	Other	2.7%

Marion	DeCoursey	36.5%
	Crutcher	60.6%
	Other	2.9%

Marshall	DeCoursey	44.4%
	Crutcher	52.7%
	Other	2.9%

Meade	DeCoursey	33.4%
	Crutcher	63.9%
	Other	2.8%

Miami	DeCoursey	53.7%
	Crutcher	43.8%
	Other	2.4%

Mitchell	DeCoursey	44.9%
	Crutcher	51.6%
	Other	3.5%

Montgomery	DeCoursey	47.0%
	Crutcher	50.3%
	Other	2.6%

Morris	DeCoursey	41.5%
	Crutcher	54.5%
	Other	4.0%

Morton	DeCoursey	50.5%
	Crutcher	47.8%
	Other	1.7%

Nemaha	DeCoursey	53.2%
	Crutcher	45.0%
	Other	1.8%

Neosho	DeCoursey	47.2%
	Crutcher	49.7%
	Other	3.1%

Ness	DeCoursey	42.8%
	Crutcher	55.4%
	Other	1.8%

Norton	DeCoursey	35.7%
	Crutcher	62.1%
	Other	2.2%

Osage	DeCoursey	50.4%
	Crutcher	46.9%
	Other	2.7%

Osborne	DeCoursey	37.6%
	Crutcher	59.2%
	Other	3.1%

Ottawa	DeCoursey	40.9%
	Crutcher	57.0%
	Other	2.2%

Pawnee	DeCoursey	51.0%
	Crutcher	47.1%
	Other	1.9%

Phillips	DeCoursey	32.9%
	Crutcher	61.8%
	Other	5.3%

Pottawatomie	DeCoursey	41.3%
	Crutcher	57.2%
	Other	1.5%

Pratt	DeCoursey	42.8%
	Crutcher	56.3%
	Other	0.9%

Rawlins	DeCoursey	39.4%
	Crutcher	57.7%
	Other	2.9%

Reno	DeCoursey	41.3%
	Crutcher	57.0%
	Other	1.8%

Republic	DeCoursey	39.3%
	Crutcher	58.1%
	Other	2.6%

Rice	DeCoursey	41.6%
	Crutcher	56.8%
	Other	1.6%

Riley	DeCoursey	36.0%
	Crutcher	60.9%
	Other	3.1%

Rooks	DeCoursey	39.3%
	Crutcher	58.1%
	Other	2.6%

Rush	DeCoursey	47.1%
	Crutcher	51.3%
	Other	1.6%

Russell	DeCoursey	39.2%
	Crutcher	58.2%
	Other	2.6%

Saline	DeCoursey	42.4%
	Crutcher	55.7%
	Other	1.9%

Scott	DeCoursey	37.5%
	Crutcher	60.6%
	Other	2.0%

Sedgwick	DeCoursey	52.9%
	Crutcher	40.8%
	Other	6.3%

Seward	DeCoursey	41.8%
	Crutcher	55.1%
	Other	3.2%

Shawnee	DeCoursey	49.5%
	Crutcher	48.0%
	Other	2.5%

Sheridan	DeCoursey	50.4%
	Crutcher	47.7%
	Other	2.0%

Sherman	DeCoursey	45.0%
	Crutcher	51.3%
	Other	3.8%

Smith	DeCoursey	32.9%
	Crutcher	64.1%
	Other	3.0%

Stafford	DeCoursey	39.7%
	Crutcher	58.4%
	Other	1.8%

Stanton	DeCoursey	41.6%
	Crutcher	56.0%
	Other	2.4%

Stevens	DeCoursey	40.2%
	Crutcher	58.0%
	Other	1.9%

Sumner	DeCoursey	52.4%
	Crutcher	45.1%
	Other	2.5%

Thomas	DeCoursey	45.8%
	Crutcher	51.5%
	Other	2.6%

Trego	DeCoursey	45.8%
	Crutcher	52.4%
	Other	1.8%

Wabaunsee	DeCoursey	38.0%
	Crutcher	58.7%
	Other	3.3%

Wallace	DeCoursey	34.5%
	Crutcher	60.5%
	Other	5.0%

Washington	DeCoursey	33.2%
	Crutcher	62.9%
	Other	3.9%

Wichita	DeCoursey	41.4%
	Crutcher	56.7%
	Other	1.9%

Wilson	DeCoursey	37.2%
	Crutcher	59.0%
	Other	3.8%

Woodson	DeCoursey	39.6%
	Crutcher	57.8%
	Other	2.6%

Wyandotte	DeCoursey	65.4%
	Crutcher	29.8%
	Other	4.8%

National DataGraph for 1966 - Kansas Results for 1966

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved