Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-06-06

Map

Map

Alamance	Smith	39.1%
	Troxler	60.9%

Alexander	Smith	29.0%
	Troxler	71.0%

Alleghany	Smith	34.0%
	Troxler	66.0%

Anson	Smith	65.2%
	Troxler	34.8%

Ashe	Smith	34.3%
	Troxler	65.7%

Avery	Smith	22.8%
	Troxler	77.2%

Beaufort	Smith	41.2%
	Troxler	58.8%

Bertie	Smith	67.6%
	Troxler	32.4%

Bladen	Smith	54.9%
	Troxler	45.1%

Brunswick	Smith	38.8%
	Troxler	61.2%

Buncombe	Smith	53.8%
	Troxler	46.2%

Burke	Smith	38.5%
	Troxler	61.5%

Cabarrus	Smith	37.2%
	Troxler	62.8%

Caldwell	Smith	32.2%
	Troxler	67.8%

Camden	Smith	37.1%
	Troxler	62.9%

Carteret	Smith	28.5%
	Troxler	71.5%

Caswell	Smith	46.6%
	Troxler	53.4%

Catawba	Smith	33.2%
	Troxler	66.8%

Chatham	Smith	48.4%
	Troxler	51.6%

Cherokee	Smith	31.4%
	Troxler	68.6%

Chowan	Smith	51.0%
	Troxler	49.0%

Clay	Smith	33.0%
	Troxler	67.0%

Cleveland	Smith	42.6%
	Troxler	57.4%

Columbus	Smith	55.6%
	Troxler	44.4%

Craven	Smith	41.7%
	Troxler	58.3%

Cumberland	Smith	59.5%
	Troxler	40.5%

Currituck	Smith	34.3%
	Troxler	65.7%

Dare	Smith	44.0%
	Troxler	56.0%

Davidson	Smith	26.3%
	Troxler	73.7%

Davie	Smith	24.3%
	Troxler	75.7%

Duplin	Smith	45.7%
	Troxler	54.3%

Durham	Smith	72.3%
	Troxler	27.7%

Edgecombe	Smith	68.5%
	Troxler	31.5%

Forsyth	Smith	50.0%
	Troxler	50.0%

Franklin	Smith	43.8%
	Troxler	56.2%

Gaston	Smith	37.5%
	Troxler	62.5%

Gates	Smith	56.0%
	Troxler	44.0%

Graham	Smith	34.7%
	Troxler	65.3%

Granville	Smith	50.2%
	Troxler	49.8%

Greene	Smith	48.3%
	Troxler	51.7%

Guilford	Smith	52.5%
	Troxler	47.5%

Halifax	Smith	66.7%
	Troxler	33.3%

Harnett	Smith	38.6%
	Troxler	61.4%

Haywood	Smith	39.0%
	Troxler	61.0%

Henderson	Smith	33.3%
	Troxler	66.7%

Hertford	Smith	73.8%
	Troxler	26.2%

Hoke	Smith	59.0%
	Troxler	41.0%

Hyde	Smith	48.8%
	Troxler	51.2%

Iredell	Smith	33.8%
	Troxler	66.2%

Jackson	Smith	50.5%
	Troxler	49.5%

Johnston	Smith	32.2%
	Troxler	67.8%

Jones	Smith	47.0%
	Troxler	53.0%

Lee	Smith	42.4%
	Troxler	57.6%

Lenoir	Smith	51.7%
	Troxler	48.3%

Lincoln	Smith	30.5%
	Troxler	69.5%

McDowell	Smith	34.0%
	Troxler	66.0%

Macon	Smith	37.9%
	Troxler	62.1%

Madison	Smith	45.0%
	Troxler	55.0%

Martin	Smith	54.3%
	Troxler	45.7%

Mecklenburg	Smith	58.6%
	Troxler	41.4%

Mitchell	Smith	23.9%
	Troxler	76.1%

Montgomery	Smith	41.6%
	Troxler	58.4%

Moore	Smith	32.9%
	Troxler	67.1%

Nash	Smith	49.3%
	Troxler	50.7%

New Hanover	Smith	45.9%
	Troxler	54.1%

Northampton	Smith	68.5%
	Troxler	31.5%

Onslow	Smith	39.0%
	Troxler	61.0%

Orange	Smith	65.9%
	Troxler	34.1%

Pamlico	Smith	41.3%
	Troxler	58.7%

Pasquotank	Smith	59.2%
	Troxler	40.8%

Pender	Smith	40.0%
	Troxler	60.0%

Perquimans	Smith	44.4%
	Troxler	55.6%

Person	Smith	43.6%
	Troxler	56.4%

Pitt	Smith	53.0%
	Troxler	47.0%

Polk	Smith	41.8%
	Troxler	58.2%

Randolph	Smith	21.9%
	Troxler	78.1%

Richmond	Smith	54.9%
	Troxler	45.1%

Robeson	Smith	68.1%
	Troxler	31.9%

Rockingham	Smith	35.2%
	Troxler	64.8%

Rowan	Smith	34.4%
	Troxler	65.6%

Rutherford	Smith	37.5%
	Troxler	62.5%

Sampson	Smith	44.6%
	Troxler	55.4%

Scotland	Smith	61.6%
	Troxler	38.4%

Stanly	Smith	31.3%
	Troxler	68.7%

Stokes	Smith	26.1%
	Troxler	73.9%

Surry	Smith	29.8%
	Troxler	70.2%

Swain	Smith	49.4%
	Troxler	50.6%

Transylvania	Smith	39.2%
	Troxler	60.8%

Tyrrell	Smith	49.8%
	Troxler	50.2%

Union	Smith	33.7%
	Troxler	66.3%

Vance	Smith	63.8%
	Troxler	36.2%

Wake	Smith	48.4%
	Troxler	51.6%

Warren	Smith	68.1%
	Troxler	31.9%

Washington	Smith	60.6%
	Troxler	39.4%

Watauga	Smith	46.5%
	Troxler	53.5%

Wayne	Smith	45.2%
	Troxler	54.8%

Wilkes	Smith	26.9%
	Troxler	73.1%

Wilson	Smith	52.9%
	Troxler	47.1%

Yadkin	Smith	26.3%
	Troxler	73.7%

Yancey	Smith	45.5%
	Troxler	54.5%

National DataGraph for 2012 - North Carolina Results for 2012

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved