1968 Gubernatorial General Election Data Graphs - North Carolina
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.
Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-09-15

Map

AlamanceScott58.5%
 
Gardner41.5%
 


AlexanderScott41.9%
 
Gardner58.1%
 


AlleghanyScott52.6%
 
Gardner47.4%
 


AnsonScott67.6%
 
Gardner32.4%
 


AsheScott46.3%
 
Gardner53.7%
 


AveryScott26.6%
 
Gardner73.4%
 


BeaufortScott52.3%
 
Gardner47.7%
 


BertieScott68.0%
 
Gardner32.0%
 


BladenScott67.0%
 
Gardner33.0%
 


BrunswickScott57.1%
 
Gardner42.9%
 


BuncombeScott56.5%
 
Gardner43.5%
 


BurkeScott46.4%
 
Gardner53.6%
 


CabarrusScott46.3%
 
Gardner53.7%
 


CaldwellScott44.2%
 
Gardner55.8%
 


CamdenScott68.1%
 
Gardner31.9%
 


CarteretScott50.0%
 
Gardner50.0%
 


CaswellScott71.0%
 
Gardner29.0%
 


CatawbaScott39.5%
 
Gardner60.5%
 


ChathamScott54.8%
 
Gardner45.2%
 


CherokeeScott46.4%
 
Gardner53.6%
 


ChowanScott65.2%
 
Gardner34.8%
 


ClayScott46.0%
 
Gardner54.0%
 


ClevelandScott57.6%
 
Gardner42.4%
 


ColumbusScott60.0%
 
Gardner40.0%
 


CravenScott47.9%
 
Gardner52.1%
 


CumberlandScott59.2%
 
Gardner40.8%
 


CurrituckScott71.3%
 
Gardner28.7%
 


DareScott60.9%
 
Gardner39.1%
 


DavidsonScott44.0%
 
Gardner56.0%
 


DavieScott37.9%
 
Gardner62.1%
 


DuplinScott55.5%
 
Gardner44.5%
 


DurhamScott54.4%
 
Gardner45.6%
 


EdgecombeScott59.4%
 
Gardner40.6%
 


ForsythScott50.4%
 
Gardner49.6%
 


FranklinScott55.6%
 
Gardner44.4%
 


GastonScott47.3%
 
Gardner52.7%
 


GatesScott74.1%
 
Gardner25.9%
 


GrahamScott46.9%
 
Gardner53.1%
 


GranvilleScott56.4%
 
Gardner43.6%
 


GreeneScott60.7%
 
Gardner39.3%
 


GuilfordScott55.7%
 
Gardner44.3%
 


HalifaxScott60.0%
 
Gardner40.0%
 


HarnettScott48.1%
 
Gardner51.9%
 


HaywoodScott62.1%
 
Gardner37.9%
 


HendersonScott38.3%
 
Gardner61.7%
 


HertfordScott73.3%
 
Gardner26.7%
 


HokeScott74.8%
 
Gardner25.2%
 


HydeScott63.5%
 
Gardner36.5%
 


IredellScott48.8%
 
Gardner51.2%
 


JacksonScott53.8%
 
Gardner46.2%
 


JohnstonScott44.8%
 
Gardner55.2%
 


JonesScott56.3%
 
Gardner43.7%
 


LeeScott57.7%
 
Gardner42.3%
 


LenoirScott50.7%
 
Gardner49.3%
 


LincolnScott48.5%
 
Gardner51.5%
 


McDowellScott52.7%
 
Gardner47.3%
 


MaconScott52.6%
 
Gardner47.4%
 


MadisonScott52.4%
 
Gardner47.6%
 


MartinScott68.2%
 
Gardner31.8%
 


MecklenburgScott55.2%
 
Gardner44.8%
 


MitchellScott27.8%
 
Gardner72.2%
 


MontgomeryScott52.4%
 
Gardner47.6%
 


MooreScott51.0%
 
Gardner49.0%
 


NashScott49.9%
 
Gardner50.1%
 


New HanoverScott53.0%
 
Gardner47.0%
 


NorthamptonScott76.2%
 
Gardner23.8%
 


OnslowScott44.1%
 
Gardner55.9%
 


OrangeScott64.1%
 
Gardner35.9%
 


PamlicoScott55.0%
 
Gardner45.0%
 


PasquotankScott62.8%
 
Gardner37.2%
 


PenderScott63.1%
 
Gardner36.9%
 


PerquimansScott64.9%
 
Gardner35.1%
 


PersonScott55.0%
 
Gardner45.0%
 


PittScott58.3%
 
Gardner41.7%
 


PolkScott50.5%
 
Gardner49.5%
 


RandolphScott38.4%
 
Gardner61.6%
 


RichmondScott65.2%
 
Gardner34.8%
 


RobesonScott75.7%
 
Gardner24.3%
 


RockinghamScott54.0%
 
Gardner46.0%
 


RowanScott49.0%
 
Gardner51.0%
 


RutherfordScott56.2%
 
Gardner43.8%
 


SampsonScott48.8%
 
Gardner51.2%
 


ScotlandScott74.9%
 
Gardner25.1%
 


StanlyScott42.4%
 
Gardner57.6%
 


StokesScott48.4%
 
Gardner51.6%
 


SurryScott48.1%
 
Gardner51.9%
 


SwainScott57.1%
 
Gardner42.9%
 


TransylvaniaScott51.8%
 
Gardner48.2%
 


TyrrellScott72.4%
 
Gardner27.6%
 


UnionScott58.1%
 
Gardner41.9%
 


VanceScott58.6%
 
Gardner41.4%
 


WakeScott52.1%
 
Gardner47.9%
 


WarrenScott66.6%
 
Gardner33.4%
 


WashingtonScott60.3%
 
Gardner39.7%
 


WataugaScott40.6%
 
Gardner59.4%
 


WayneScott48.5%
 
Gardner51.5%
 


WilkesScott35.5%
 
Gardner64.5%
 


WilsonScott51.5%
 
Gardner48.5%
 


YadkinScott32.5%
 
Gardner67.5%
 


YanceyScott54.3%
 
Gardner45.7%
 



National DataGraph for 1968 - North Carolina Results for 1968

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved