Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-03-25

Map

Map

Alamance	Against	37.6%
	For	62.4%

Alexander	Against	43.9%
	For	56.1%

Alleghany	Against	38.4%
	For	61.6%

Anson	Against	29.4%
	For	70.6%

Ashe	Against	37.2%
	For	62.8%

Avery	Against	39.2%
	For	60.8%

Beaufort	Against	41.4%
	For	58.6%

Bertie	Against	24.2%
	For	75.8%

Bladen	Against	32.5%
	For	67.5%

Brunswick	Against	43.3%
	For	56.7%

Buncombe	Against	28.7%
	For	71.3%

Burke	Against	27.5%
	For	72.5%

Cabarrus	Against	39.9%
	For	60.1%

Caldwell	Against	41.8%
	For	58.2%

Camden	Against	34.4%
	For	65.6%

Carteret	Against	43.4%
	For	56.6%

Caswell	Against	35.4%
	For	64.6%

Catawba	Against	35.7%
	For	64.3%

Chatham	Against	26.0%
	For	74.0%

Cherokee	Against	48.0%
	For	52.0%

Chowan	Against	26.7%
	For	73.3%

Clay	Against	45.3%
	For	54.7%

Cleveland	Against	39.6%
	For	60.4%

Columbus	Against	34.9%
	For	65.1%

Craven	Against	45.0%
	For	55.0%

Cumberland	Against	38.1%
	For	61.9%

Currituck	Against	34.4%
	For	65.6%

Dare	Against	29.8%
	For	70.2%

Davidson	Against	41.1%
	For	58.9%

Davie	Against	44.1%
	For	55.9%

Duplin	Against	39.7%
	For	60.3%

Durham	Against	17.7%
	For	82.3%

Edgecombe	Against	29.5%
	For	70.5%

Forsyth	Against	32.7%
	For	67.3%

Franklin	Against	39.2%
	For	60.8%

Gaston	Against	41.1%
	For	58.9%

Gates	Against	27.3%
	For	72.7%

Graham	Against	48.2%
	For	51.8%

Granville	Against	37.1%
	For	62.9%

Greene	Against	31.1%
	For	68.9%

Guilford	Against	34.5%
	For	65.5%

Halifax	Against	24.7%
	For	75.3%

Harnett	Against	42.4%
	For	57.6%

Haywood	Against	37.2%
	For	62.8%

Henderson	Against	37.5%
	For	62.5%

Hertford	Against	21.3%
	For	78.8%

Hoke	Against	32.3%
	For	67.7%

Hyde	Against	31.9%
	For	68.1%

Iredell	Against	46.1%
	For	53.9%

Jackson	Against	26.4%
	For	73.6%

Johnston	Against	37.2%
	For	62.8%

Jones	Against	36.4%
	For	63.6%

Lee	Against	46.6%
	For	53.4%

Lenoir	Against	36.0%
	For	64.0%

Lincoln	Against	41.6%
	For	58.4%

McDowell	Against	37.6%
	For	62.4%

Macon	Against	38.9%
	For	61.1%

Madison	Against	37.8%
	For	62.2%

Martin	Against	27.9%
	For	72.1%

Mecklenburg	Against	29.5%
	For	70.5%

Mitchell	Against	42.1%
	For	57.9%

Montgomery	Against	35.9%
	For	64.1%

Moore	Against	40.3%
	For	59.7%

Nash	Against	28.5%
	For	71.5%

New Hanover	Against	44.5%
	For	55.5%

Northampton	Against	31.0%
	For	69.0%

Onslow	Against	43.6%
	For	56.4%

Orange	Against	20.5%
	For	79.5%

Pamlico	Against	38.6%
	For	61.4%

Pasquotank	Against	28.5%
	For	71.5%

Pender	Against	54.8%
	For	45.2%

Perquimans	Against	27.7%
	For	72.3%

Person	Against	35.2%
	For	64.8%

Pitt	Against	31.7%
	For	68.3%

Polk	Against	38.8%
	For	61.2%

Randolph	Against	40.8%
	For	59.2%

Richmond	Against	34.6%
	For	65.4%

Robeson	Against	29.1%
	For	70.9%

Rockingham	Against	38.5%
	For	61.5%

Rowan	Against	40.1%
	For	59.9%

Rutherford	Against	34.9%
	For	65.1%

Sampson	Against	35.4%
	For	64.6%

Scotland	Against	35.0%
	For	65.0%

Stanly	Against	42.8%
	For	57.2%

Stokes	Against	43.6%
	For	56.4%

Surry	Against	40.6%
	For	59.4%

Swain	Against	37.8%
	For	62.2%

Transylvania	Against	36.8%
	For	63.2%

Tyrrell	Against	29.9%
	For	70.1%

Union	Against	38.0%
	For	62.0%

Vance	Against	26.5%
	For	73.5%

Wake	Against	29.4%
	For	70.6%

Warren	Against	21.5%
	For	78.5%

Washington	Against	29.1%
	For	70.9%

Watauga	Against	32.3%
	For	67.7%

Wayne	Against	34.2%
	For	65.8%

Wilkes	Against	44.4%
	For	55.6%

Wilson	Against	28.5%
	For	71.5%

Yadkin	Against	43.9%
	For	56.1%

Yancey	Against	37.6%
	For	62.4%

National DataGraph for 2016 - North Carolina Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved