Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-09-04

Map

Map

Adams	Smith	53.0%
	Lorge	43.6%
	Other	3.3%

Ashland	Smith	58.6%
	Lorge	36.4%
	Other	5.1%

Barron	Smith	57.1%
	Lorge	41.4%
	Other	1.5%

Bayfield	Smith	59.4%
	Lorge	37.1%
	Other	3.4%

Brown	Smith	45.7%
	Lorge	50.7%
	Other	3.6%

Buffalo	Smith	59.2%
	Lorge	39.3%
	Other	1.5%

Burnett	Smith	64.4%
	Lorge	32.7%
	Other	2.9%

Calumet	Smith	43.1%
	Lorge	53.6%
	Other	3.3%

Chippewa	Smith	61.1%
	Lorge	35.9%
	Other	3.1%

Clark	Smith	54.9%
	Lorge	42.7%
	Other	2.4%

Columbia	Smith	55.2%
	Lorge	43.3%
	Other	1.6%

Crawford	Smith	58.8%
	Lorge	38.1%
	Other	3.1%

Dane	Smith	62.9%
	Lorge	31.3%
	Other	5.8%

Dodge	Smith	45.3%
	Lorge	51.7%
	Other	3.0%

Door	Smith	39.4%
	Lorge	56.8%
	Other	3.8%

Douglas	Smith	73.3%
	Lorge	24.7%
	Other	2.0%

Dunn	Smith	59.4%
	Lorge	37.0%
	Other	3.6%

Eau Claire	Smith	55.4%
	Lorge	40.8%
	Other	3.7%

Florence	Smith	54.8%
	Lorge	44.0%
	Other	1.2%

Fond du Lac	Smith	43.7%
	Lorge	53.0%
	Other	3.3%

Forest	Smith	62.1%
	Lorge	35.1%
	Other	2.7%

Grant	Smith	46.6%
	Lorge	51.6%
	Other	1.8%

Green	Smith	47.5%
	Lorge	49.1%
	Other	3.4%

Green Lake	Smith	30.9%
	Lorge	67.7%
	Other	1.3%

Iowa	Smith	59.7%
	Lorge	38.4%
	Other	1.9%

Iron	Smith	62.6%
	Lorge	35.1%
	Other	2.3%

Jackson	Smith	62.1%
	Lorge	36.0%
	Other	1.9%

Jefferson	Smith	48.4%
	Lorge	49.6%
	Other	2.0%

Juneau	Smith	36.7%
	Lorge	60.6%
	Other	2.8%

Kenosha	Smith	66.6%
	Lorge	29.7%
	Other	3.7%

Kewaunee	Smith	56.9%
	Lorge	39.7%
	Other	3.4%

La Crosse	Smith	54.4%
	Lorge	40.2%
	Other	5.3%

Lafayette	Smith	55.5%
	Lorge	42.6%
	Other	1.9%

Langlade	Smith	48.1%
	Lorge	49.4%
	Other	2.5%

Lincoln	Smith	48.3%
	Lorge	47.2%
	Other	4.5%

Manitowoc	Smith	55.3%
	Lorge	41.1%
	Other	3.7%

Marathon	Smith	53.0%
	Lorge	41.9%
	Other	5.1%

Marinette	Smith	47.2%
	Lorge	50.3%
	Other	2.5%

Marquette	Smith	39.5%
	Lorge	57.9%
	Other	2.6%

Menominee	Smith	73.9%
	Lorge	21.2%
	Other	4.9%

Milwaukee	Smith	59.5%
	Lorge	35.8%
	Other	4.6%

Monroe	Smith	47.9%
	Lorge	49.8%
	Other	2.2%

Oconto	Smith	45.8%
	Lorge	51.5%
	Other	2.7%

Oneida	Smith	51.3%
	Lorge	46.5%
	Other	2.2%

Outagamie	Smith	35.8%
	Lorge	61.9%
	Other	2.3%

Ozaukee	Smith	35.1%
	Lorge	62.1%
	Other	2.8%

Pepin	Smith	61.3%
	Lorge	34.6%
	Other	4.1%

Pierce	Smith	56.8%
	Lorge	40.8%
	Other	2.3%

Polk	Smith	61.3%
	Lorge	37.3%
	Other	1.4%

Portage	Smith	59.3%
	Lorge	36.0%
	Other	4.7%

Price	Smith	53.3%
	Lorge	44.2%
	Other	2.5%

Racine	Smith	58.5%
	Lorge	38.7%
	Other	2.8%

Richland	Smith	48.2%
	Lorge	48.7%
	Other	3.1%

Rock	Smith	55.9%
	Lorge	41.0%
	Other	3.1%

Rusk	Smith	59.1%
	Lorge	39.3%
	Other	1.6%

St. Croix	Smith	57.7%
	Lorge	41.1%
	Other	1.2%

Sauk	Smith	47.8%
	Lorge	48.4%
	Other	3.8%

Sawyer	Smith	47.1%
	Lorge	50.2%
	Other	2.7%

Shawano	Smith	34.9%
	Lorge	63.8%
	Other	1.2%

Sheboygan	Smith	58.3%
	Lorge	39.3%
	Other	2.4%

Taylor	Smith	53.6%
	Lorge	42.8%
	Other	3.6%

Trempealeau	Smith	63.6%
	Lorge	34.6%
	Other	1.8%

Vernon	Smith	52.8%
	Lorge	44.9%
	Other	2.3%

Vilas	Smith	37.5%
	Lorge	59.8%
	Other	2.7%

Walworth	Smith	42.0%
	Lorge	54.4%
	Other	3.6%

Washburn	Smith	59.1%
	Lorge	38.5%
	Other	2.5%

Washington	Smith	40.4%
	Lorge	55.3%
	Other	4.3%

Waukesha	Smith	39.8%
	Lorge	56.9%
	Other	3.2%

Waupaca	Smith	32.5%
	Lorge	65.8%
	Other	1.7%

Waushara	Smith	33.9%
	Lorge	64.2%
	Other	1.9%

Winnebago	Smith	41.4%
	Lorge	56.2%
	Other	2.5%

Wood	Smith	50.3%
	Lorge	45.0%
	Other	4.7%

National DataGraph for 1986 - Wisconsin Results for 1986

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved