Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-07-24

Map

Map

Adams	Romer	61.0%
	Strickland	38.1%
	Other	0.9%

Alamosa	Romer	58.4%
	Strickland	41.1%
	Other	0.5%

Arapahoe	Romer	54.4%
	Strickland	44.8%
	Other	0.8%

Archuleta	Romer	44.7%
	Strickland	54.9%
	Other	0.4%

Baca	Romer	51.2%
	Strickland	48.2%
	Other	0.6%

Bent	Romer	61.3%
	Strickland	38.2%
	Other	0.5%

Boulder	Romer	64.3%
	Strickland	35.2%
	Other	0.5%

Chaffee	Romer	58.2%
	Strickland	40.9%
	Other	0.9%

Cheyenne	Romer	45.7%
	Strickland	53.6%
	Other	0.7%

Clear Creek	Romer	59.8%
	Strickland	38.9%
	Other	1.3%

Conejos	Romer	56.5%
	Strickland	42.9%
	Other	0.6%

Costilla	Romer	75.6%
	Strickland	23.8%
	Other	0.6%

Crowley	Romer	49.4%
	Strickland	50.2%
	Other	0.4%

Custer	Romer	40.0%
	Strickland	59.3%
	Other	0.7%

Delta	Romer	49.8%
	Strickland	49.2%
	Other	1.0%

Denver	Romer	71.7%
	Strickland	27.4%
	Other	0.9%

Dolores	Romer	54.9%
	Strickland	44.3%
	Other	0.8%

Douglas	Romer	46.3%
	Strickland	52.8%
	Other	0.8%

Eagle	Romer	58.3%
	Strickland	40.9%
	Other	0.8%

Elbert	Romer	49.2%
	Strickland	50.2%
	Other	0.6%

El Paso	Romer	43.0%
	Strickland	56.5%
	Other	0.5%

Fremont	Romer	51.6%
	Strickland	48.0%
	Other	0.4%

Garfield	Romer	56.4%
	Strickland	43.1%
	Other	0.5%

Gilpin	Romer	61.9%
	Strickland	37.0%
	Other	1.1%

Grand	Romer	53.1%
	Strickland	46.3%
	Other	0.6%

Gunnison	Romer	60.8%
	Strickland	38.6%
	Other	0.6%

Hinsdale	Romer	43.6%
	Strickland	56.4%

Huerfano	Romer	69.9%
	Strickland	29.8%
	Other	0.3%

Jackson	Romer	37.5%
	Strickland	61.9%
	Other	0.7%

Jefferson	Romer	56.9%
	Strickland	42.3%
	Other	0.8%

Kiowa	Romer	50.2%
	Strickland	49.6%
	Other	0.2%

Kit Carson	Romer	48.0%
	Strickland	51.2%
	Other	0.8%

Lake	Romer	66.0%
	Strickland	32.6%
	Other	1.4%

La Plata	Romer	49.4%
	Strickland	49.9%
	Other	0.7%

Larimer	Romer	56.7%
	Strickland	42.5%
	Other	0.8%

Las Animas	Romer	71.6%
	Strickland	27.7%
	Other	0.7%

Lincoln	Romer	49.8%
	Strickland	49.7%
	Other	0.5%

Logan	Romer	55.1%
	Strickland	43.7%
	Other	1.2%

Mesa	Romer	53.2%
	Strickland	45.9%
	Other	0.9%

Mineral	Romer	59.8%
	Strickland	39.6%
	Other	0.5%

Moffat	Romer	45.0%
	Strickland	53.7%
	Other	1.3%

Montezuma	Romer	43.5%
	Strickland	55.8%
	Other	0.7%

Montrose	Romer	51.1%
	Strickland	47.7%
	Other	1.2%

Morgan	Romer	48.6%
	Strickland	50.1%
	Other	1.4%

Otero	Romer	55.2%
	Strickland	44.3%
	Other	0.6%

Ouray	Romer	40.3%
	Strickland	59.5%
	Other	0.2%

Park	Romer	54.8%
	Strickland	43.8%
	Other	1.4%

Phillips	Romer	54.8%
	Strickland	44.8%
	Other	0.5%

Pitkin	Romer	61.0%
	Strickland	38.2%
	Other	0.8%

Prowers	Romer	63.4%
	Strickland	35.5%
	Other	1.0%

Pueblo	Romer	68.3%
	Strickland	31.2%
	Other	0.5%

Rio Blanco	Romer	51.6%
	Strickland	47.8%
	Other	0.6%

Rio Grande	Romer	53.4%
	Strickland	46.1%
	Other	0.5%

Routt	Romer	59.1%
	Strickland	40.1%
	Other	0.8%

Saguache	Romer	58.8%
	Strickland	40.8%
	Other	0.4%

San Juan	Romer	58.0%
	Strickland	41.5%
	Other	0.5%

San Miguel	Romer	64.4%
	Strickland	35.3%
	Other	0.3%

Sedgwick	Romer	52.2%
	Strickland	47.2%
	Other	0.7%

Summit	Romer	64.0%
	Strickland	35.1%
	Other	0.9%

Teller	Romer	44.5%
	Strickland	54.6%
	Other	0.9%

Washington	Romer	46.8%
	Strickland	51.8%
	Other	1.4%

Weld	Romer	54.7%
	Strickland	44.4%
	Other	0.9%

Yuma	Romer	55.0%
	Strickland	44.2%
	Other	0.8%

National DataGraph for 1986 - Colorado Results for 1986

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved