Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-07-26

Map

Map

Adams	Romer	60.0%
	Wiens	36.9%
	Other	3.1%

Alamosa	Romer	59.7%
	Wiens	37.9%
	Other	2.4%

Arapahoe	Romer	46.4%
	Wiens	51.2%
	Other	2.3%

Archuleta	Romer	53.5%
	Wiens	42.1%
	Other	4.5%

Baca	Romer	52.1%
	Wiens	45.8%
	Other	2.0%

Bent	Romer	57.5%
	Wiens	39.5%
	Other	3.0%

Boulder	Romer	52.5%
	Wiens	43.4%
	Other	4.1%

Chaffee	Romer	52.2%
	Wiens	45.0%
	Other	2.8%

Cheyenne	Romer	50.4%
	Wiens	47.4%
	Other	2.2%

Clear Creek	Romer	49.5%
	Wiens	46.1%
	Other	4.4%

Conejos	Romer	57.2%
	Wiens	38.4%
	Other	4.4%

Costilla	Romer	78.1%
	Wiens	19.2%
	Other	2.7%

Crowley	Romer	53.7%
	Wiens	44.1%
	Other	2.2%

Custer	Romer	42.0%
	Wiens	54.2%
	Other	3.8%

Delta	Romer	51.3%
	Wiens	45.8%
	Other	2.9%

Denver	Romer	61.7%
	Wiens	35.2%
	Other	3.1%

Dolores	Romer	64.0%
	Wiens	33.9%
	Other	2.0%

Douglas	Romer	41.5%
	Wiens	55.6%
	Other	2.9%

Eagle	Romer	49.2%
	Wiens	47.6%
	Other	3.3%

Elbert	Romer	46.1%
	Wiens	51.6%
	Other	2.2%

El Paso	Romer	44.2%
	Wiens	52.9%
	Other	2.8%

Fremont	Romer	51.4%
	Wiens	45.9%
	Other	2.7%

Garfield	Romer	51.2%
	Wiens	44.0%
	Other	4.8%

Gilpin	Romer	48.9%
	Wiens	42.6%
	Other	8.5%

Grand	Romer	46.8%
	Wiens	50.1%
	Other	3.2%

Gunnison	Romer	54.9%
	Wiens	42.0%
	Other	3.2%

Hinsdale	Romer	37.9%
	Wiens	57.7%
	Other	4.4%

Huerfano	Romer	66.3%
	Wiens	31.7%
	Other	2.0%

Jackson	Romer	49.4%
	Wiens	46.8%
	Other	3.8%

Jefferson	Romer	51.6%
	Wiens	45.7%
	Other	2.7%

Kiowa	Romer	52.0%
	Wiens	47.1%
	Other	0.8%

Kit Carson	Romer	47.9%
	Wiens	50.3%
	Other	1.8%

Lake	Romer	56.6%
	Wiens	38.2%
	Other	5.2%

La Plata	Romer	48.0%
	Wiens	48.4%
	Other	3.6%

Larimer	Romer	48.3%
	Wiens	47.3%
	Other	4.4%

Las Animas	Romer	70.1%
	Wiens	28.1%
	Other	1.7%

Lincoln	Romer	51.9%
	Wiens	47.2%
	Other	0.9%

Logan	Romer	52.5%
	Wiens	45.6%
	Other	2.0%

Mesa	Romer	50.5%
	Wiens	45.0%
	Other	4.6%

Mineral	Romer	55.9%
	Wiens	39.2%
	Other	5.0%

Moffat	Romer	46.7%
	Wiens	45.1%
	Other	8.2%

Montezuma	Romer	52.6%
	Wiens	42.9%
	Other	4.6%

Montrose	Romer	50.2%
	Wiens	46.6%
	Other	3.2%

Morgan	Romer	49.7%
	Wiens	47.7%
	Other	2.6%

Otero	Romer	55.6%
	Wiens	41.5%
	Other	2.9%

Ouray	Romer	35.7%
	Wiens	60.9%
	Other	3.3%

Park	Romer	54.2%
	Wiens	42.0%
	Other	3.8%

Phillips	Romer	55.4%
	Wiens	42.9%
	Other	1.7%

Pitkin	Romer	47.7%
	Wiens	40.0%
	Other	12.3%

Prowers	Romer	58.0%
	Wiens	38.9%
	Other	3.1%

Pueblo	Romer	63.5%
	Wiens	33.0%
	Other	3.5%

Rio Blanco	Romer	45.8%
	Wiens	49.0%
	Other	5.2%

Rio Grande	Romer	51.6%
	Wiens	45.3%
	Other	3.1%

Routt	Romer	56.1%
	Wiens	40.3%
	Other	3.6%

Saguache	Romer	58.6%
	Wiens	38.9%
	Other	2.5%

San Juan	Romer	53.0%
	Wiens	40.4%
	Other	6.6%

San Miguel	Romer	54.5%
	Wiens	37.2%
	Other	8.3%

Sedgwick	Romer	50.7%
	Wiens	47.6%
	Other	1.7%

Summit	Romer	49.7%
	Wiens	45.7%
	Other	4.6%

Teller	Romer	48.4%
	Wiens	47.3%
	Other	4.3%

Washington	Romer	47.5%
	Wiens	49.6%
	Other	2.9%

Weld	Romer	52.3%
	Wiens	45.4%
	Other	2.3%

Yuma	Romer	51.2%
	Wiens	47.1%
	Other	1.6%

National DataGraph for 1978 - Colorado Results for 1978

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved