1976 Gubernatorial General Election Data Graphs - Illinois
by CountyData for this Contest was Contributed by on 2009-12-18Adams | Howlett | 24.3% | |
Thompson | 75.5% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Alexander | Howlett | 52.7% | |
Thompson | 46.8% | |
Other | 0.5% | |
Bond | Howlett | 36.3% | |
Thompson | 63.5% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Boone | Howlett | 18.9% | |
Thompson | 80.8% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Brown | Howlett | 31.8% | |
Thompson | 67.2% | |
Other | 1.1% | |
Bureau | Howlett | 28.0% | |
Thompson | 71.8% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Calhoun | Howlett | 41.8% | |
Thompson | 58.2% | |
Other | 0.0% | |
Carroll | Howlett | 21.8% | |
Thompson | 78.0% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Cass | Howlett | 34.5% | |
Thompson | 65.4% | |
Other | 0.0% | |
Champaign | Howlett | 22.3% | |
Thompson | 76.7% | |
Other | 1.1% | |
Christian | Howlett | 34.8% | |
Thompson | 64.9% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Clark | Howlett | 34.4% | |
Thompson | 65.5% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Clay | Howlett | 35.2% | |
Thompson | 64.7% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Clinton | Howlett | 35.7% | |
Thompson | 64.2% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Coles | Howlett | 26.2% | |
Thompson | 73.4% | |
Other | 0.4% | |
Cook | Howlett | 42.0% | |
Thompson | 57.3% | |
Other | 0.7% | |
Crawford | Howlett | 33.1% | |
Thompson | 66.8% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Cumberland | Howlett | 35.8% | |
Thompson | 63.7% | |
Other | 0.5% | |
DeKalb | Howlett | 19.0% | |
Thompson | 80.1% | |
Other | 0.9% | |
De Witt | Howlett | 24.2% | |
Thompson | 75.6% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Douglas | Howlett | 24.3% | |
Thompson | 75.6% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
DuPage | Howlett | 17.3% | |
Thompson | 81.5% | |
Other | 1.2% | |
Edgar | Howlett | 35.9% | |
Thompson | 63.8% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Edwards | Howlett | 30.7% | |
Thompson | 69.1% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Effingham | Howlett | 34.6% | |
Thompson | 64.9% | |
Other | 0.5% | |
Fayette | Howlett | 38.4% | |
Thompson | 61.5% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Ford | Howlett | 20.2% | |
Thompson | 79.7% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Franklin | Howlett | 44.0% | |
Thompson | 55.8% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Fulton | Howlett | 33.1% | |
Thompson | 66.6% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Gallatin | Howlett | 50.3% | |
Thompson | 49.6% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Greene | Howlett | 35.1% | |
Thompson | 64.8% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Grundy | Howlett | 22.8% | |
Thompson | 77.1% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Hamilton | Howlett | 38.4% | |
Thompson | 61.5% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Hancock | Howlett | 25.7% | |
Thompson | 74.2% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Hardin | Howlett | 41.0% | |
Thompson | 58.7% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Henderson | Howlett | 34.1% | |
Thompson | 65.8% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Henry | Howlett | 27.5% | |
Thompson | 72.2% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Iroquois | Howlett | 19.2% | |
Thompson | 80.5% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Jackson | Howlett | 32.1% | |
Thompson | 66.4% | |
Other | 1.5% | |
Jasper | Howlett | 36.7% | |
Thompson | 63.2% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Jefferson | Howlett | 36.9% | |
Thompson | 62.9% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Jersey | Howlett | 37.0% | |
Thompson | 62.9% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Jo Daviess | Howlett | 29.3% | |
Thompson | 70.4% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Johnson | Howlett | 32.3% | |
Thompson | 67.6% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Kane | Howlett | 21.2% | |
Thompson | 78.3% | |
Other | 0.5% | |
Kankakee | Howlett | 31.3% | |
Thompson | 68.0% | |
Other | 0.7% | |
Kendall | Howlett | 13.6% | |
Thompson | 86.2% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Knox | Howlett | 27.9% | |
Thompson | 71.7% | |
Other | 0.4% | |
Lake | Howlett | 20.1% | |
Thompson | 79.4% | |
Other | 0.5% | |
LaSalle | Howlett | 32.4% | |
Thompson | 67.3% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Lawrence | Howlett | 36.6% | |
Thompson | 63.4% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Lee | Howlett | 24.4% | |
Thompson | 75.4% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Livingston | Howlett | 23.3% | |
Thompson | 76.3% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Logan | Howlett | 24.8% | |
Thompson | 75.1% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
McDonough | Howlett | 21.4% | |
Thompson | 78.1% | |
Other | 0.6% | |
McHenry | Howlett | 17.0% | |
Thompson | 82.6% | |
Other | 0.4% | |
McLean | Howlett | 19.8% | |
Thompson | 79.7% | |
Other | 0.5% | |
Macon | Howlett | 27.8% | |
Thompson | 72.0% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Macoupin | Howlett | 37.6% | |
Thompson | 61.8% | |
Other | 0.6% | |
Madison | Howlett | 40.4% | |
Thompson | 59.4% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Marion | Howlett | 41.9% | |
Thompson | 57.8% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Marshall | Howlett | 28.8% | |
Thompson | 71.1% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Mason | Howlett | 33.7% | |
Thompson | 66.1% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Massac | Howlett | 30.1% | |
Thompson | 69.8% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Menard | Howlett | 27.0% | |
Thompson | 72.9% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Mercer | Howlett | 26.4% | |
Thompson | 73.5% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Monroe | Howlett | 33.1% | |
Thompson | 66.6% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Montgomery | Howlett | 37.0% | |
Thompson | 62.9% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Morgan | Howlett | 31.0% | |
Thompson | 68.7% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Moultrie | Howlett | 27.5% | |
Thompson | 72.4% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Ogle | Howlett | 15.4% | |
Thompson | 84.2% | |
Other | 0.4% | |
Peoria | Howlett | 30.4% | |
Thompson | 69.2% | |
Other | 0.4% | |
Perry | Howlett | 39.5% | |
Thompson | 60.2% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Piatt | Howlett | 22.5% | |
Thompson | 77.3% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Pike | Howlett | 32.9% | |
Thompson | 66.2% | |
Other | 0.9% | |
Pope | Howlett | 32.2% | |
Thompson | 67.6% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Pulaski | Howlett | 45.6% | |
Thompson | 54.2% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Putnam | Howlett | 29.7% | |
Thompson | 69.8% | |
Other | 0.4% | |
Randolph | Howlett | 42.2% | |
Thompson | 57.7% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Richland | Howlett | 31.3% | |
Thompson | 68.0% | |
Other | 0.7% | |
Rock Island | Howlett | 32.9% | |
Thompson | 66.3% | |
Other | 0.8% | |
St. Clair | Howlett | 47.6% | |
Thompson | 51.9% | |
Other | 0.5% | |
Saline | Howlett | 41.4% | |
Thompson | 58.5% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Sangamon | Howlett | 34.1% | |
Thompson | 64.9% | |
Other | 0.9% | |
Schuyler | Howlett | 29.0% | |
Thompson | 70.9% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Scott | Howlett | 29.8% | |
Thompson | 70.0% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Shelby | Howlett | 27.6% | |
Thompson | 72.2% | |
Other | 0.2% | |
Stark | Howlett | 23.5% | |
Thompson | 75.0% | |
Other | 1.5% | |
Stephenson | Howlett | 19.7% | |
Thompson | 80.0% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Tazewell | Howlett | 28.4% | |
Thompson | 71.1% | |
Other | 0.5% | |
Union | Howlett | 43.3% | |
Thompson | 56.6% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Vermilion | Howlett | 36.0% | |
Thompson | 63.6% | |
Other | 0.4% | |
Wabash | Howlett | 40.0% | |
Thompson | 59.7% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Warren | Howlett | 27.1% | |
Thompson | 72.1% | |
Other | 0.8% | |
Washington | Howlett | 30.7% | |
Thompson | 68.7% | |
Other | 0.7% | |
Wayne | Howlett | 34.8% | |
Thompson | 65.0% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
White | Howlett | 41.7% | |
Thompson | 58.2% | |
Other | 0.1% | |
Whiteside | Howlett | 25.2% | |
Thompson | 74.5% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Will | Howlett | 28.2% | |
Thompson | 71.4% | |
Other | 0.4% | |
Williamson | Howlett | 37.8% | |
Thompson | 61.9% | |
Other | 0.3% | |
Winnebago | Howlett | 22.0% | |
Thompson | 77.1% | |
Other | 0.9% | |
Woodford | Howlett | 22.2% | |
Thompson | 77.5% | |
Other | 0.3% | |