Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Alamance	Gore	66.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	20.8%
	Other	12.6%

Alexander	Gore	78.3%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	13.7%
	Other	8.0%

Alleghany	Gore	72.7%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	15.5%
	Other	11.8%

Anson	Gore	74.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	12.6%
	Other	12.9%

Ashe	Gore	84.8%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	8.7%
	Other	6.5%

Avery	Gore	76.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	10.5%
	Other	12.9%

Beaufort	Gore	61.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	21.8%
	Other	16.8%

Bertie	Gore	72.9%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	15.8%
	Other	11.3%

Bladen	Gore	70.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	14.4%
	Other	15.2%

Brunswick	Gore	74.1%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	15.4%
	Other	10.5%

Buncombe	Gore	70.8%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.2%
	Other	11.1%

Burke	Gore	77.9%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	13.9%
	Other	8.2%

Cabarrus	Gore	67.3%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	20.5%
	Other	12.1%

Caldwell	Gore	77.7%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	13.0%
	Other	9.3%

Camden	Gore	57.0%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.2%
	Other	23.8%

Carteret	Gore	68.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.4%
	Other	12.1%

Caswell	Gore	68.2%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.7%
	Other	12.1%

Catawba	Gore	73.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	16.3%
	Other	10.1%

Chatham	Gore	65.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	23.5%
	Other	11.0%

Cherokee	Gore	78.2%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	16.1%
	Other	5.7%

Chowan	Gore	68.8%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.4%
	Other	11.8%

Clay	Gore	80.3%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	13.8%
	Other	5.9%

Cleveland	Gore	65.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.1%
	Other	16.5%

Columbus	Gore	74.2%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	12.9%
	Other	12.9%

Craven	Gore	67.2%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	20.6%
	Other	12.3%

Cumberland	Gore	72.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	15.1%
	Other	12.4%

Currituck	Gore	57.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	21.6%
	Other	20.7%

Dare	Gore	59.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	23.1%
	Other	17.3%

Davidson	Gore	72.7%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.1%
	Other	9.2%

Davie	Gore	67.7%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.3%
	Other	13.0%

Duplin	Gore	67.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.1%
	Other	14.4%

Durham	Gore	74.1%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.5%
	Other	7.3%

Edgecombe	Gore	75.9%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	14.2%
	Other	9.9%

Forsyth	Gore	73.8%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.5%
	Other	7.7%

Franklin	Gore	66.7%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.5%
	Other	13.8%

Gaston	Gore	67.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.7%
	Other	13.9%

Gates	Gore	73.1%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	16.6%
	Other	10.3%

Graham	Gore	74.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	13.3%
	Other	12.1%

Granville	Gore	68.3%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.2%
	Other	13.5%

Greene	Gore	55.8%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	22.2%
	Other	22.0%

Guilford	Gore	73.1%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.3%
	Other	7.6%

Halifax	Gore	72.7%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	15.3%
	Other	12.0%

Harnett	Gore	64.7%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.9%
	Other	15.5%

Haywood	Gore	70.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	16.9%
	Other	12.7%

Henderson	Gore	74.0%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	16.8%
	Other	9.2%

Hertford	Gore	80.3%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	12.0%
	Other	7.7%

Hoke	Gore	75.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	13.7%
	Other	11.0%

Hyde	Gore	59.1%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.8%
	Other	23.1%

Iredell	Gore	67.8%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.8%
	Other	14.4%

Jackson	Gore	78.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	14.0%
	Other	7.5%

Johnston	Gore	63.7%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	22.8%
	Other	13.5%

Jones	Gore	63.2%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.3%
	Other	18.4%

Lee	Gore	64.0%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	20.9%
	Other	15.1%

Lenoir	Gore	61.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	20.2%
	Other	18.2%

Lincoln	Gore	74.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	15.4%
	Other	10.0%

McDowell	Gore	69.9%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.3%
	Other	12.8%

Macon	Gore	72.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.0%
	Other	10.4%

Madison	Gore	77.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	13.9%
	Other	8.5%

Martin	Gore	67.0%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.5%
	Other	15.5%

Mecklenburg	Gore	77.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	16.4%
	Other	6.0%

Mitchell	Gore	82.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	10.0%
	Other	7.3%

Montgomery	Gore	70.3%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.1%
	Other	12.6%

Moore	Gore	75.0%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.2%
	Other	7.8%

Nash	Gore	66.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	20.6%
	Other	13.0%

New Hanover	Gore	72.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.1%
	Other	10.5%

Northampton	Gore	75.1%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	13.9%
	Other	11.0%

Onslow	Gore	63.0%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.6%
	Other	18.4%

Orange	Gore	64.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	28.2%
	Other	7.4%

Pamlico	Gore	67.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.9%
	Other	12.5%

Pasquotank	Gore	68.3%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.9%
	Other	13.8%

Pender	Gore	75.3%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	16.2%
	Other	8.5%

Perquimans	Gore	61.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	20.8%
	Other	17.5%

Person	Gore	60.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	20.6%
	Other	18.8%

Pitt	Gore	66.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	21.2%
	Other	12.2%

Polk	Gore	75.1%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	15.2%
	Other	9.7%

Randolph	Gore	72.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.2%
	Other	10.4%

Richmond	Gore	70.3%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	14.6%
	Other	15.1%

Robeson	Gore	72.2%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	13.2%
	Other	14.6%

Rockingham	Gore	65.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	20.3%
	Other	14.2%

Rowan	Gore	69.6%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.1%
	Other	11.3%

Rutherford	Gore	69.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.3%
	Other	12.1%

Sampson	Gore	77.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	13.9%
	Other	8.8%

Scotland	Gore	80.0%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	12.2%
	Other	7.8%

Stanly	Gore	66.2%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	20.6%
	Other	13.2%

Stokes	Gore	71.3%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	15.6%
	Other	13.1%

Surry	Gore	70.9%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	16.6%
	Other	12.5%

Swain	Gore	80.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	16.0%
	Other	3.5%

Transylvania	Gore	71.5%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.3%
	Other	9.1%

Tyrrell	Gore	64.9%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	14.6%
	Other	20.5%

Union	Gore	73.2%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	15.3%
	Other	11.5%

Vance	Gore	65.0%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	21.5%
	Other	13.5%

Wake	Gore	69.1%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	22.7%
	Other	8.2%

Warren	Gore	73.0%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.1%
	Other	9.9%

Washington	Gore	66.0%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.5%
	Other	15.5%

Watauga	Gore	76.2%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	15.8%
	Other	8.0%

Wayne	Gore	66.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	18.9%
	Other	14.7%

Wilkes	Gore	78.1%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	13.1%
	Other	8.8%

Wilson	Gore	69.3%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	19.8%
	Other	10.9%

Yadkin	Gore	70.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	17.9%
	Other	11.7%

Yancey	Gore	77.4%
	0	0.0%
	Bradley	11.8%
	Other	10.8%

National DataGraph for 2000 - North Carolina Results for 2000

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved