Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2008-05-07

Map

Map

Alamance	Perdue	54.6%
	Moore	41.4%
	Other	4.0%

Alexander	Perdue	51.8%
	Moore	43.9%
	Other	4.3%

Alleghany	Perdue	49.3%
	Moore	46.5%
	Other	4.2%

Anson	Perdue	44.4%
	Moore	52.3%
	Other	3.4%

Ashe	Perdue	54.5%
	Moore	42.2%
	Other	3.4%

Avery	Perdue	55.4%
	Moore	39.0%
	Other	5.6%

Beaufort	Perdue	55.4%
	Moore	40.8%
	Other	3.8%

Bertie	Perdue	64.4%
	Moore	32.9%
	Other	2.7%

Bladen	Perdue	54.7%
	Moore	40.2%
	Other	5.1%

Brunswick	Perdue	53.2%
	Moore	40.4%
	Other	6.4%

Buncombe	Perdue	54.9%
	Moore	38.8%
	Other	6.2%

Burke	Perdue	51.1%
	Moore	45.3%
	Other	3.7%

Cabarrus	Perdue	54.2%
	Moore	41.2%
	Other	4.6%

Caldwell	Perdue	46.9%
	Moore	47.9%
	Other	5.2%

Camden	Perdue	70.5%
	Moore	23.8%
	Other	5.7%

Carteret	Perdue	64.2%
	Moore	32.7%
	Other	3.1%

Caswell	Perdue	57.4%
	Moore	38.9%
	Other	3.7%

Catawba	Perdue	55.1%
	Moore	40.3%
	Other	4.6%

Chatham	Perdue	49.7%
	Moore	47.0%
	Other	3.3%

Cherokee	Perdue	56.6%
	Moore	34.4%
	Other	9.0%

Chowan	Perdue	69.7%
	Moore	24.9%
	Other	5.4%

Clay	Perdue	53.4%
	Moore	34.6%
	Other	12.0%

Cleveland	Perdue	53.4%
	Moore	41.9%
	Other	4.7%

Columbus	Perdue	59.3%
	Moore	35.6%
	Other	5.0%

Craven	Perdue	73.4%
	Moore	24.5%
	Other	2.1%

Cumberland	Perdue	60.0%
	Moore	35.6%
	Other	4.4%

Currituck	Perdue	61.9%
	Moore	27.8%
	Other	10.4%

Dare	Perdue	69.7%
	Moore	25.0%
	Other	5.3%

Davidson	Perdue	53.2%
	Moore	42.9%
	Other	3.9%

Davie	Perdue	52.9%
	Moore	42.9%
	Other	4.2%

Duplin	Perdue	60.5%
	Moore	35.9%
	Other	3.5%

Durham	Perdue	59.8%
	Moore	37.7%
	Other	2.5%

Edgecombe	Perdue	58.9%
	Moore	38.1%
	Other	3.0%

Forsyth	Perdue	60.4%
	Moore	36.0%
	Other	3.6%

Franklin	Perdue	48.7%
	Moore	47.6%
	Other	3.7%

Gaston	Perdue	55.7%
	Moore	39.8%
	Other	4.5%

Gates	Perdue	62.9%
	Moore	29.3%
	Other	7.8%

Graham	Perdue	57.3%
	Moore	36.6%
	Other	6.1%

Granville	Perdue	31.8%
	Moore	65.6%
	Other	2.7%

Greene	Perdue	53.7%
	Moore	42.1%
	Other	4.2%

Guilford	Perdue	59.8%
	Moore	36.5%
	Other	3.6%

Halifax	Perdue	60.8%
	Moore	35.5%
	Other	3.7%

Harnett	Perdue	52.5%
	Moore	43.2%
	Other	4.3%

Haywood	Perdue	49.8%
	Moore	44.6%
	Other	5.6%

Henderson	Perdue	52.5%
	Moore	41.5%
	Other	6.0%

Hertford	Perdue	65.6%
	Moore	29.6%
	Other	4.8%

Hoke	Perdue	58.5%
	Moore	37.8%
	Other	3.7%

Hyde	Perdue	61.9%
	Moore	35.2%
	Other	2.9%

Iredell	Perdue	55.0%
	Moore	39.5%
	Other	5.4%

Jackson	Perdue	51.0%
	Moore	43.8%
	Other	5.2%

Johnston	Perdue	51.5%
	Moore	44.7%
	Other	3.8%

Jones	Perdue	70.4%
	Moore	26.8%
	Other	2.8%

Lee	Perdue	50.8%
	Moore	45.5%
	Other	3.7%

Lenoir	Perdue	59.6%
	Moore	36.8%
	Other	3.6%

Lincoln	Perdue	53.6%
	Moore	41.5%
	Other	4.8%

McDowell	Perdue	49.4%
	Moore	44.8%
	Other	5.8%

Macon	Perdue	48.0%
	Moore	47.0%
	Other	5.0%

Madison	Perdue	52.1%
	Moore	42.2%
	Other	5.7%

Martin	Perdue	54.7%
	Moore	43.1%
	Other	2.2%

Mecklenburg	Perdue	62.8%
	Moore	33.3%
	Other	3.9%

Mitchell	Perdue	55.6%
	Moore	39.7%
	Other	4.7%

Montgomery	Perdue	52.6%
	Moore	43.1%
	Other	4.4%

Moore	Perdue	46.2%
	Moore	50.4%
	Other	3.4%

Nash	Perdue	54.2%
	Moore	41.9%
	Other	3.8%

New Hanover	Perdue	55.7%
	Moore	39.0%
	Other	5.3%

Northampton	Perdue	65.0%
	Moore	31.2%
	Other	3.7%

Onslow	Perdue	61.6%
	Moore	33.9%
	Other	4.5%

Orange	Perdue	51.9%
	Moore	45.2%
	Other	2.9%

Pamlico	Perdue	72.1%
	Moore	24.9%
	Other	3.0%

Pasquotank	Perdue	65.1%
	Moore	28.7%
	Other	6.2%

Pender	Perdue	56.5%
	Moore	37.1%
	Other	6.4%

Perquimans	Perdue	66.2%
	Moore	26.6%
	Other	7.3%

Person	Perdue	51.0%
	Moore	45.3%
	Other	3.7%

Pitt	Perdue	57.2%
	Moore	39.7%
	Other	3.1%

Polk	Perdue	53.5%
	Moore	40.2%
	Other	6.3%

Randolph	Perdue	53.9%
	Moore	42.0%
	Other	4.1%

Richmond	Perdue	50.4%
	Moore	44.5%
	Other	5.1%

Robeson	Perdue	53.5%
	Moore	42.1%
	Other	4.4%

Rockingham	Perdue	51.5%
	Moore	44.0%
	Other	4.5%

Rowan	Perdue	54.8%
	Moore	39.9%
	Other	5.3%

Rutherford	Perdue	49.8%
	Moore	43.5%
	Other	6.7%

Sampson	Perdue	60.1%
	Moore	36.5%
	Other	3.4%

Scotland	Perdue	58.1%
	Moore	35.8%
	Other	6.1%

Stanly	Perdue	53.8%
	Moore	41.6%
	Other	4.6%

Stokes	Perdue	48.6%
	Moore	47.3%
	Other	4.1%

Surry	Perdue	48.3%
	Moore	47.9%
	Other	3.8%

Swain	Perdue	46.4%
	Moore	47.6%
	Other	6.0%

Transylvania	Perdue	45.8%
	Moore	48.0%
	Other	6.2%

Tyrrell	Perdue	56.4%
	Moore	39.8%
	Other	3.8%

Union	Perdue	57.7%
	Moore	37.4%
	Other	4.9%

Vance	Perdue	34.3%
	Moore	63.3%
	Other	2.4%

Wake	Perdue	54.6%
	Moore	42.4%
	Other	3.0%

Warren	Perdue	37.0%
	Moore	59.6%
	Other	3.4%

Washington	Perdue	70.8%
	Moore	25.8%
	Other	3.4%

Watauga	Perdue	60.0%
	Moore	35.2%
	Other	4.8%

Wayne	Perdue	53.1%
	Moore	42.9%
	Other	3.9%

Wilkes	Perdue	53.4%
	Moore	41.9%
	Other	4.7%

Wilson	Perdue	50.0%
	Moore	47.0%
	Other	3.1%

Yadkin	Perdue	53.3%
	Moore	42.7%
	Other	4.0%

Yancey	Perdue	52.6%
	Moore	42.5%
	Other	4.9%

National DataGraph for 2008 - North Carolina Results for 2008

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved