Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2020-09-19

Map

Map

Alamance	Wells	11.1%
	Robinson	39.5%
	Johnson	15.8%
	Other	33.6%

Alexander	Wells	34.5%
	Robinson	39.8%
	Johnson	7.1%
	Other	18.6%

Alleghany	Wells	9.2%
	Robinson	34.1%
	Johnson	16.0%
	Other	40.7%

Anson	Wells	14.3%
	Robinson	40.3%
	Johnson	18.1%
	Other	27.3%

Ashe	Wells	9.2%
	Robinson	39.3%
	Johnson	20.2%
	Other	31.3%

Avery	Wells	12.9%
	Robinson	40.7%
	Johnson	18.9%
	Other	27.5%

Beaufort	Wells	7.3%
	Robinson	42.7%
	Johnson	11.6%
	Other	38.3%

Bertie	Wells	10.8%
	Robinson	38.4%
	Johnson	12.4%
	Other	38.4%

Bladen	Wells	11.7%
	Robinson	49.5%
	Johnson	10.9%
	Other	28.0%

Brunswick	Wells	17.3%
	Robinson	25.9%
	Johnson	8.7%
	Other	48.1%

Buncombe	Wells	18.4%
	Robinson	33.0%
	Johnson	12.0%
	Other	36.6%

Burke	Wells	20.1%
	Robinson	37.3%
	Johnson	12.2%
	Other	30.4%

Cabarrus	Wells	14.1%
	Robinson	32.1%
	Johnson	13.8%
	Other	40.0%

Caldwell	Wells	23.1%
	Robinson	40.6%
	Johnson	11.6%
	Other	24.7%

Camden	Wells	5.7%
	Robinson	42.9%
	Johnson	11.0%
	Other	40.4%

Carteret	Wells	5.2%
	Robinson	49.8%
	Johnson	8.2%
	Other	36.8%

Caswell	Wells	11.7%
	Robinson	50.4%
	Johnson	12.3%
	Other	25.7%

Catawba	Wells	41.6%
	Robinson	27.8%
	Johnson	9.1%
	Other	21.5%

Chatham	Wells	14.7%
	Robinson	32.0%
	Johnson	7.8%
	Other	45.5%

Cherokee	Wells	6.0%
	Robinson	39.7%
	Johnson	18.1%
	Other	36.1%

Chowan	Wells	13.6%
	Robinson	41.7%
	Johnson	12.0%
	Other	32.7%

Clay	Wells	5.9%
	Robinson	36.3%
	Johnson	17.2%
	Other	40.6%

Cleveland	Wells	15.6%
	Robinson	26.1%
	Johnson	14.3%
	Other	44.1%

Columbus	Wells	10.8%
	Robinson	47.5%
	Johnson	13.4%
	Other	28.3%

Craven	Wells	5.0%
	Robinson	44.0%
	Johnson	8.0%
	Other	43.0%

Cumberland	Wells	15.8%
	Robinson	20.7%
	Johnson	8.5%
	Other	55.0%

Currituck	Wells	4.8%
	Robinson	34.8%
	Johnson	13.6%
	Other	46.8%

Dare	Wells	7.5%
	Robinson	35.5%
	Johnson	12.8%
	Other	44.3%

Davidson	Wells	12.1%
	Robinson	33.1%
	Johnson	14.7%
	Other	40.1%

Davie	Wells	10.5%
	Robinson	34.0%
	Johnson	18.6%
	Other	36.9%

Duplin	Wells	10.5%
	Robinson	45.7%
	Johnson	11.3%
	Other	32.5%

Durham	Wells	17.9%
	Robinson	21.8%
	Johnson	9.1%
	Other	51.2%

Edgecombe	Wells	12.6%
	Robinson	34.6%
	Johnson	8.2%
	Other	44.6%

Forsyth	Wells	16.3%
	Robinson	23.6%
	Johnson	18.0%
	Other	42.1%

Franklin	Wells	16.9%
	Robinson	31.9%
	Johnson	8.2%
	Other	42.9%

Gaston	Wells	15.7%
	Robinson	32.0%
	Johnson	14.1%
	Other	38.2%

Gates	Wells	9.6%
	Robinson	41.9%
	Johnson	13.4%
	Other	35.2%

Graham	Wells	5.8%
	Robinson	50.5%
	Johnson	13.4%
	Other	30.4%

Granville	Wells	14.9%
	Robinson	29.7%
	Johnson	9.3%
	Other	46.0%

Greene	Wells	9.0%
	Robinson	47.0%
	Johnson	13.5%
	Other	30.5%

Guilford	Wells	15.5%
	Robinson	36.7%
	Johnson	13.3%
	Other	34.5%

Halifax	Wells	10.0%
	Robinson	49.1%
	Johnson	8.0%
	Other	32.9%

Harnett	Wells	9.9%
	Robinson	23.5%
	Johnson	11.5%
	Other	55.1%

Haywood	Wells	12.7%
	Robinson	36.9%
	Johnson	13.5%
	Other	36.9%

Henderson	Wells	11.4%
	Robinson	36.6%
	Johnson	12.5%
	Other	39.5%

Hertford	Wells	7.5%
	Robinson	38.0%
	Johnson	14.1%
	Other	40.4%

Hoke	Wells	12.5%
	Robinson	21.7%
	Johnson	9.0%
	Other	56.8%

Hyde	Wells	6.6%
	Robinson	49.8%
	Johnson	10.6%
	Other	33.0%

Iredell	Wells	17.2%
	Robinson	25.1%
	Johnson	16.5%
	Other	41.2%

Jackson	Wells	6.2%
	Robinson	29.7%
	Johnson	15.1%
	Other	49.0%

Johnston	Wells	13.8%
	Robinson	30.8%
	Johnson	11.9%
	Other	43.5%

Jones	Wells	6.7%
	Robinson	49.5%
	Johnson	9.2%
	Other	34.5%

Lee	Wells	8.0%
	Robinson	55.5%
	Johnson	5.0%
	Other	31.6%

Lenoir	Wells	6.7%
	Robinson	34.0%
	Johnson	12.3%
	Other	47.0%

Lincoln	Wells	13.6%
	Robinson	42.4%
	Johnson	13.2%
	Other	30.8%

McDowell	Wells	8.1%
	Robinson	47.9%
	Johnson	13.1%
	Other	30.9%

Macon	Wells	6.1%
	Robinson	25.3%
	Johnson	11.9%
	Other	56.8%

Madison	Wells	11.7%
	Robinson	42.0%
	Johnson	15.3%
	Other	31.0%

Martin	Wells	10.4%
	Robinson	45.8%
	Johnson	10.9%
	Other	32.8%

Mecklenburg	Wells	18.9%
	Robinson	17.3%
	Johnson	10.9%
	Other	52.9%

Mitchell	Wells	8.2%
	Robinson	57.5%
	Johnson	9.5%
	Other	24.8%

Montgomery	Wells	7.3%
	Robinson	43.7%
	Johnson	7.8%
	Other	41.2%

Moore	Wells	15.5%
	Robinson	16.4%
	Johnson	5.5%
	Other	62.6%

Nash	Wells	10.5%
	Robinson	40.7%
	Johnson	10.1%
	Other	38.8%

New Hanover	Wells	18.4%
	Robinson	26.8%
	Johnson	11.1%
	Other	43.7%

Northampton	Wells	11.0%
	Robinson	35.4%
	Johnson	9.0%
	Other	44.6%

Onslow	Wells	10.2%
	Robinson	31.1%
	Johnson	11.9%
	Other	46.8%

Orange	Wells	14.4%
	Robinson	30.8%
	Johnson	10.6%
	Other	44.2%

Pamlico	Wells	6.1%
	Robinson	53.5%
	Johnson	8.5%
	Other	32.0%

Pasquotank	Wells	10.7%
	Robinson	41.0%
	Johnson	12.3%
	Other	36.0%

Pender	Wells	16.0%
	Robinson	33.7%
	Johnson	10.1%
	Other	40.2%

Perquimans	Wells	7.9%
	Robinson	36.3%
	Johnson	13.9%
	Other	41.9%

Person	Wells	12.1%
	Robinson	45.6%
	Johnson	11.4%
	Other	30.9%

Pitt	Wells	8.9%
	Robinson	40.9%
	Johnson	12.1%
	Other	38.2%

Polk	Wells	4.8%
	Robinson	52.6%
	Johnson	13.0%
	Other	29.6%

Randolph	Wells	14.5%
	Robinson	32.2%
	Johnson	12.1%
	Other	41.2%

Richmond	Wells	13.8%
	Robinson	36.6%
	Johnson	13.2%
	Other	36.3%

Robeson	Wells	8.2%
	Robinson	30.5%
	Johnson	18.5%
	Other	42.8%

Rockingham	Wells	11.5%
	Robinson	45.2%
	Johnson	17.7%
	Other	25.6%

Rowan	Wells	13.2%
	Robinson	33.3%
	Johnson	15.2%
	Other	38.2%

Rutherford	Wells	6.4%
	Robinson	53.7%
	Johnson	8.5%
	Other	31.4%

Sampson	Wells	14.0%
	Robinson	34.4%
	Johnson	9.9%
	Other	41.7%

Scotland	Wells	7.9%
	Robinson	35.0%
	Johnson	15.2%
	Other	41.9%

Stanly	Wells	12.2%
	Robinson	39.7%
	Johnson	12.1%
	Other	35.9%

Stokes	Wells	11.0%
	Robinson	38.5%
	Johnson	22.0%
	Other	28.5%

Surry	Wells	7.1%
	Robinson	26.4%
	Johnson	10.4%
	Other	56.1%

Swain	Wells	3.2%
	Robinson	31.7%
	Johnson	12.8%
	Other	52.2%

Transylvania	Wells	16.2%
	Robinson	34.6%
	Johnson	12.7%
	Other	36.5%

Tyrrell	Wells	9.8%
	Robinson	48.8%
	Johnson	8.8%
	Other	32.7%

Union	Wells	15.5%
	Robinson	28.6%
	Johnson	12.2%
	Other	43.8%

Vance	Wells	15.0%
	Robinson	27.3%
	Johnson	9.7%
	Other	48.1%

Wake	Wells	17.7%
	Robinson	24.4%
	Johnson	7.8%
	Other	50.1%

Warren	Wells	20.2%
	Robinson	28.3%
	Johnson	10.0%
	Other	41.5%

Washington	Wells	8.3%
	Robinson	38.9%
	Johnson	11.1%
	Other	41.7%

Watauga	Wells	16.2%
	Robinson	35.3%
	Johnson	10.2%
	Other	38.2%

Wayne	Wells	14.9%
	Robinson	31.8%
	Johnson	9.4%
	Other	43.9%

Wilkes	Wells	11.2%
	Robinson	34.8%
	Johnson	18.9%
	Other	35.0%

Wilson	Wells	16.9%
	Robinson	35.1%
	Johnson	9.3%
	Other	38.7%

Yadkin	Wells	9.8%
	Robinson	37.5%
	Johnson	17.0%
	Other	35.7%

Yancey	Wells	5.4%
	Robinson	63.9%
	Johnson	9.1%
	Other	21.6%

National DataGraph for 2020 - North Carolina Results for 2020

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved