Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-02-03

Map

Map

Adair	Humphreys	8.3%
	Coburn	83.7%
	Anthony	6.5%
	Other	1.5%

Alfalfa	Humphreys	34.5%
	Coburn	40.6%
	Anthony	22.7%
	Other	2.2%

Atoka	Humphreys	12.7%
	Coburn	62.7%
	Anthony	20.2%
	Other	4.4%

Beaver	Humphreys	22.7%
	Coburn	57.2%
	Anthony	16.8%
	Other	3.3%

Beckham	Humphreys	38.2%
	Coburn	49.0%
	Anthony	11.8%
	Other	1.0%

Blaine	Humphreys	28.0%
	Coburn	43.0%
	Anthony	26.3%
	Other	2.7%

Bryan	Humphreys	21.7%
	Coburn	45.1%
	Anthony	23.7%
	Other	9.6%

Caddo	Humphreys	31.2%
	Coburn	49.3%
	Anthony	18.1%
	Other	1.4%

Canadian	Humphreys	31.2%
	Coburn	52.0%
	Anthony	15.6%
	Other	1.2%

Carter	Humphreys	31.5%
	Coburn	47.2%
	Anthony	18.5%
	Other	2.8%

Cherokee	Humphreys	12.4%
	Coburn	80.5%
	Anthony	5.9%
	Other	1.2%

Choctaw	Humphreys	20.1%
	Coburn	52.6%
	Anthony	19.5%
	Other	7.8%

Cimarron	Humphreys	14.8%
	Coburn	72.6%
	Anthony	7.9%
	Other	4.7%

Cleveland	Humphreys	34.2%
	Coburn	51.1%
	Anthony	13.7%
	Other	1.0%

Coal	Humphreys	8.4%
	Coburn	63.2%
	Anthony	25.3%
	Other	3.2%

Comanche	Humphreys	18.8%
	Coburn	51.0%
	Anthony	27.6%
	Other	2.6%

Cotton	Humphreys	26.4%
	Coburn	38.4%
	Anthony	28.0%
	Other	7.2%

Craig	Humphreys	12.0%
	Coburn	81.3%
	Anthony	5.6%
	Other	1.0%

Creek	Humphreys	12.7%
	Coburn	80.1%
	Anthony	6.3%
	Other	0.9%

Custer	Humphreys	38.0%
	Coburn	46.6%
	Anthony	14.0%
	Other	1.4%

Delaware	Humphreys	12.4%
	Coburn	78.5%
	Anthony	7.0%
	Other	2.1%

Dewey	Humphreys	25.8%
	Coburn	46.5%
	Anthony	26.0%
	Other	1.8%

Ellis	Humphreys	30.2%
	Coburn	42.8%
	Anthony	24.7%
	Other	2.3%

Garfield	Humphreys	27.2%
	Coburn	54.1%
	Anthony	17.2%
	Other	1.4%

Garvin	Humphreys	31.5%
	Coburn	51.8%
	Anthony	14.7%
	Other	2.0%

Grady	Humphreys	30.1%
	Coburn	52.4%
	Anthony	16.3%
	Other	1.2%

Grant	Humphreys	28.1%
	Coburn	50.1%
	Anthony	19.0%
	Other	2.9%

Greer	Humphreys	35.5%
	Coburn	54.0%
	Anthony	8.9%
	Other	1.6%

Harmon	Humphreys	48.7%
	Coburn	33.3%
	Anthony	10.3%
	Other	7.7%

Harper	Humphreys	31.9%
	Coburn	43.4%
	Anthony	24.0%
	Other	0.7%

Haskell	Humphreys	9.7%
	Coburn	81.9%
	Anthony	5.7%
	Other	2.6%

Hughes	Humphreys	23.8%
	Coburn	60.3%
	Anthony	14.6%
	Other	1.3%

Jackson	Humphreys	36.7%
	Coburn	43.6%
	Anthony	18.2%
	Other	1.6%

Jefferson	Humphreys	23.8%
	Coburn	43.6%
	Anthony	30.7%
	Other	2.0%

Johnston	Humphreys	20.8%
	Coburn	42.2%
	Anthony	33.5%
	Other	3.5%

Kay	Humphreys	24.1%
	Coburn	58.0%
	Anthony	15.7%
	Other	2.2%

Kingfisher	Humphreys	27.0%
	Coburn	47.9%
	Anthony	24.3%
	Other	0.8%

Kiowa	Humphreys	31.3%
	Coburn	48.1%
	Anthony	18.0%
	Other	2.5%

Latimer	Humphreys	20.6%
	Coburn	66.1%
	Anthony	9.7%
	Other	3.6%

Le Flore	Humphreys	17.6%
	Coburn	60.7%
	Anthony	15.1%
	Other	6.6%

Lincoln	Humphreys	31.4%
	Coburn	50.0%
	Anthony	17.1%
	Other	1.6%

Logan	Humphreys	29.1%
	Coburn	52.1%
	Anthony	17.4%
	Other	1.4%

Love	Humphreys	26.9%
	Coburn	42.3%
	Anthony	30.2%
	Other	0.5%

McClain	Humphreys	29.5%
	Coburn	54.7%
	Anthony	14.8%
	Other	1.1%

McCurtain	Humphreys	18.8%
	Coburn	57.8%
	Anthony	15.9%
	Other	7.5%

McIntosh	Humphreys	9.1%
	Coburn	82.5%
	Anthony	7.0%
	Other	1.4%

Major	Humphreys	27.4%
	Coburn	41.0%
	Anthony	30.2%
	Other	1.4%

Marshall	Humphreys	19.3%
	Coburn	40.8%
	Anthony	34.2%
	Other	5.7%

Mayes	Humphreys	9.0%
	Coburn	84.8%
	Anthony	5.3%
	Other	0.9%

Murray	Humphreys	38.4%
	Coburn	46.5%
	Anthony	13.8%
	Other	1.3%

Muskogee	Humphreys	5.5%
	Coburn	90.9%
	Anthony	2.9%
	Other	0.7%

Noble	Humphreys	32.1%
	Coburn	48.0%
	Anthony	19.0%
	Other	0.9%

Nowata	Humphreys	14.5%
	Coburn	75.5%
	Anthony	8.8%
	Other	1.2%

Okfuskee	Humphreys	16.6%
	Coburn	72.6%
	Anthony	10.0%
	Other	0.8%

Oklahoma	Humphreys	34.5%
	Coburn	49.4%
	Anthony	15.3%
	Other	0.8%

Okmulgee	Humphreys	12.7%
	Coburn	81.1%
	Anthony	4.5%
	Other	1.8%

Osage	Humphreys	16.2%
	Coburn	73.8%
	Anthony	8.9%
	Other	1.1%

Ottawa	Humphreys	9.7%
	Coburn	80.6%
	Anthony	6.6%
	Other	3.1%

Pawnee	Humphreys	17.6%
	Coburn	69.6%
	Anthony	10.4%
	Other	2.3%

Payne	Humphreys	28.0%
	Coburn	57.6%
	Anthony	13.4%
	Other	1.0%

Pittsburg	Humphreys	23.1%
	Coburn	65.1%
	Anthony	9.6%
	Other	2.2%

Pontotoc	Humphreys	30.5%
	Coburn	52.7%
	Anthony	15.2%
	Other	1.6%

Pottawatomie	Humphreys	29.5%
	Coburn	55.7%
	Anthony	13.7%
	Other	1.1%

Pushmataha	Humphreys	17.4%
	Coburn	52.8%
	Anthony	22.9%
	Other	6.9%

Roger Mills	Humphreys	26.6%
	Coburn	59.3%
	Anthony	12.6%
	Other	1.5%

Rogers	Humphreys	11.7%
	Coburn	82.3%
	Anthony	4.9%
	Other	1.0%

Seminole	Humphreys	31.8%
	Coburn	49.2%
	Anthony	18.2%
	Other	0.8%

Sequoyah	Humphreys	9.6%
	Coburn	82.3%
	Anthony	4.9%
	Other	3.2%

Stephens	Humphreys	25.5%
	Coburn	57.3%
	Anthony	15.7%
	Other	1.4%

Texas	Humphreys	26.4%
	Coburn	61.7%
	Anthony	8.9%
	Other	3.0%

Tillman	Humphreys	39.1%
	Coburn	44.0%
	Anthony	14.1%
	Other	2.7%

Tulsa	Humphreys	17.9%
	Coburn	75.3%
	Anthony	5.8%
	Other	1.0%

Wagoner	Humphreys	11.9%
	Coburn	82.5%
	Anthony	4.7%
	Other	0.9%

Washington	Humphreys	13.7%
	Coburn	75.1%
	Anthony	9.8%
	Other	1.3%

Washita	Humphreys	37.5%
	Coburn	48.2%
	Anthony	12.6%
	Other	1.7%

Woods	Humphreys	28.6%
	Coburn	42.5%
	Anthony	27.5%
	Other	1.3%

Woodward	Humphreys	31.8%
	Coburn	43.0%
	Anthony	23.6%
	Other	1.7%

National DataGraph for 2004 - Oklahoma Results for 2004

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved