Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2018-06-18

Map

Map

Adams	Mango	27.6%
	Wagner	52.3%
	Ellsworth	20.2%

Allegheny	Mango	48.3%
	Wagner	27.3%
	Ellsworth	24.4%

Armstrong	Mango	49.1%
	Wagner	35.5%
	Ellsworth	15.4%

Beaver	Mango	52.5%
	Wagner	28.1%
	Ellsworth	19.4%

Bedford	Mango	27.8%
	Wagner	54.1%
	Ellsworth	18.1%

Berks	Mango	47.4%
	Wagner	38.9%
	Ellsworth	13.6%

Blair	Mango	28.9%
	Wagner	50.0%
	Ellsworth	21.2%

Bradford	Mango	34.7%
	Wagner	49.9%
	Ellsworth	15.4%

Bucks	Mango	36.5%
	Wagner	48.6%
	Ellsworth	14.9%

Butler	Mango	54.2%
	Wagner	25.9%
	Ellsworth	19.9%

Cambria	Mango	33.3%
	Wagner	46.0%
	Ellsworth	20.7%

Cameron	Mango	27.6%
	Wagner	51.4%
	Ellsworth	21.0%

Carbon	Mango	40.6%
	Wagner	48.5%
	Ellsworth	10.9%

Centre	Mango	28.9%
	Wagner	49.2%
	Ellsworth	22.0%

Chester	Mango	32.4%
	Wagner	47.5%
	Ellsworth	20.1%

Clarion	Mango	44.6%
	Wagner	41.3%
	Ellsworth	14.1%

Clearfield	Mango	31.0%
	Wagner	52.1%
	Ellsworth	16.9%

Clinton	Mango	41.2%
	Wagner	47.0%
	Ellsworth	11.8%

Columbia	Mango	30.6%
	Wagner	53.3%
	Ellsworth	16.1%

Crawford	Mango	36.7%
	Wagner	48.1%
	Ellsworth	15.2%

Cumberland	Mango	29.4%
	Wagner	42.6%
	Ellsworth	28.0%

Dauphin	Mango	33.3%
	Wagner	40.4%
	Ellsworth	26.3%

Delaware	Mango	26.4%
	Wagner	52.1%
	Ellsworth	21.5%

Elk	Mango	29.3%
	Wagner	48.9%
	Ellsworth	21.9%

Erie	Mango	27.7%
	Wagner	53.1%
	Ellsworth	19.2%

Fayette	Mango	48.9%
	Wagner	39.7%
	Ellsworth	11.4%

Forest	Mango	36.9%
	Wagner	40.8%
	Ellsworth	22.4%

Franklin	Mango	33.6%
	Wagner	47.1%
	Ellsworth	19.3%

Fulton	Mango	30.8%
	Wagner	57.9%
	Ellsworth	11.4%

Greene	Mango	43.2%
	Wagner	42.9%
	Ellsworth	13.9%

Huntingdon	Mango	22.9%
	Wagner	60.0%
	Ellsworth	17.1%

Indiana	Mango	43.1%
	Wagner	41.2%
	Ellsworth	15.7%

Jefferson	Mango	47.5%
	Wagner	37.1%
	Ellsworth	15.5%

Juniata	Mango	31.1%
	Wagner	47.8%
	Ellsworth	21.2%

Lackawanna	Mango	42.2%
	Wagner	39.6%
	Ellsworth	18.1%

Lancaster	Mango	32.2%
	Wagner	45.4%
	Ellsworth	22.4%

Lawrence	Mango	48.0%
	Wagner	34.6%
	Ellsworth	17.4%

Lebanon	Mango	34.2%
	Wagner	41.1%
	Ellsworth	24.7%

Lehigh	Mango	43.6%
	Wagner	40.8%
	Ellsworth	15.6%

Luzerne	Mango	37.6%
	Wagner	47.4%
	Ellsworth	15.0%

Lycoming	Mango	40.9%
	Wagner	46.2%
	Ellsworth	12.9%

McKean	Mango	30.1%
	Wagner	49.4%
	Ellsworth	20.4%

Mercer	Mango	55.1%
	Wagner	30.1%
	Ellsworth	14.8%

Mifflin	Mango	31.5%
	Wagner	48.1%
	Ellsworth	20.3%

Monroe	Mango	44.1%
	Wagner	43.7%
	Ellsworth	12.2%

Montgomery	Mango	36.6%
	Wagner	43.1%
	Ellsworth	20.3%

Montour	Mango	27.4%
	Wagner	53.6%
	Ellsworth	19.0%

Northampton	Mango	40.9%
	Wagner	45.5%
	Ellsworth	13.5%

Northumberland	Mango	38.7%
	Wagner	44.8%
	Ellsworth	16.5%

Perry	Mango	32.1%
	Wagner	44.1%
	Ellsworth	23.8%

Philadelphia	Mango	40.4%
	Wagner	38.8%
	Ellsworth	20.8%

Pike	Mango	45.3%
	Wagner	40.7%
	Ellsworth	14.0%

Potter	Mango	51.2%
	Wagner	39.8%
	Ellsworth	9.0%

Schuylkill	Mango	30.2%
	Wagner	53.7%
	Ellsworth	16.1%

Snyder	Mango	54.1%
	Wagner	33.0%
	Ellsworth	12.9%

Somerset	Mango	27.7%
	Wagner	54.6%
	Ellsworth	17.7%

Sullivan	Mango	29.0%
	Wagner	55.1%
	Ellsworth	15.9%

Susquehanna	Mango	37.7%
	Wagner	46.1%
	Ellsworth	16.2%

Tioga	Mango	37.5%
	Wagner	50.1%
	Ellsworth	12.4%

Union	Mango	47.1%
	Wagner	37.9%
	Ellsworth	14.9%

Venango	Mango	47.3%
	Wagner	35.7%
	Ellsworth	17.0%

Warren	Mango	21.2%
	Wagner	65.7%
	Ellsworth	13.0%

Washington	Mango	47.4%
	Wagner	37.2%
	Ellsworth	15.4%

Wayne	Mango	42.9%
	Wagner	41.8%
	Ellsworth	15.3%

Westmoreland	Mango	48.4%
	Wagner	35.1%
	Ellsworth	16.5%

Wyoming	Mango	36.1%
	Wagner	44.9%
	Ellsworth	19.0%

York	Mango	19.4%
	Wagner	64.8%
	Ellsworth	15.7%

National DataGraph for 2018 - Pennsylvania Results for 2018

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved