Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2016-06-07

Map

Map

Adams	Casey	48.2%
	McCorkel	50.7%
	Other	1.1%

Allegheny	Casey	59.5%
	McCorkel	39.2%
	Other	1.3%

Armstrong	Casey	55.9%
	McCorkel	43.1%
	Other	1.0%

Beaver	Casey	63.8%
	McCorkel	34.8%
	Other	1.4%

Bedford	Casey	44.3%
	McCorkel	54.9%
	Other	0.8%

Berks	Casey	59.3%
	McCorkel	39.0%
	Other	1.6%

Blair	Casey	48.9%
	McCorkel	50.0%
	Other	1.1%

Bradford	Casey	40.0%
	McCorkel	58.4%
	Other	1.7%

Bucks	Casey	48.7%
	McCorkel	49.4%
	Other	1.9%

Butler	Casey	52.1%
	McCorkel	46.4%
	Other	1.5%

Cambria	Casey	66.7%
	McCorkel	32.5%
	Other	0.8%

Cameron	Casey	53.5%
	McCorkel	45.8%
	Other	0.7%

Carbon	Casey	57.2%
	McCorkel	41.8%
	Other	1.0%

Centre	Casey	59.6%
	McCorkel	38.7%
	Other	1.6%

Chester	Casey	42.0%
	McCorkel	56.1%
	Other	1.9%

Clarion	Casey	55.1%
	McCorkel	44.0%
	Other	0.9%

Clearfield	Casey	54.0%
	McCorkel	45.3%
	Other	0.7%

Clinton	Casey	59.8%
	McCorkel	39.3%
	Other	0.8%

Columbia	Casey	64.5%
	McCorkel	33.7%
	Other	1.9%

Crawford	Casey	53.3%
	McCorkel	45.0%
	Other	1.7%

Cumberland	Casey	49.7%
	McCorkel	49.4%
	Other	1.0%

Dauphin	Casey	47.8%
	McCorkel	51.2%
	Other	0.9%

Delaware	Casey	42.9%
	McCorkel	55.9%
	Other	1.2%

Elk	Casey	68.5%
	McCorkel	30.8%
	Other	0.7%

Erie	Casey	63.8%
	McCorkel	35.1%
	Other	1.1%

Fayette	Casey	62.5%
	McCorkel	36.6%
	Other	0.8%

Forest	Casey	49.6%
	McCorkel	49.7%
	Other	0.7%

Franklin	Casey	47.9%
	McCorkel	50.3%
	Other	1.8%

Fulton	Casey	49.7%
	McCorkel	48.7%
	Other	1.6%

Greene	Casey	67.8%
	McCorkel	31.1%
	Other	1.0%

Huntingdon	Casey	49.5%
	McCorkel	49.3%
	Other	1.1%

Indiana	Casey	57.5%
	McCorkel	41.6%
	Other	0.8%

Jefferson	Casey	53.1%
	McCorkel	46.2%
	Other	0.7%

Juniata	Casey	51.1%
	McCorkel	48.3%
	Other	0.5%

Lackawanna	Casey	70.1%
	McCorkel	29.4%
	Other	0.4%

Lancaster	Casey	33.0%
	McCorkel	65.6%
	Other	1.4%

Lawrence	Casey	56.9%
	McCorkel	41.9%
	Other	1.2%

Lebanon	Casey	39.0%
	McCorkel	59.8%
	Other	1.2%

Lehigh	Casey	53.7%
	McCorkel	45.2%
	Other	1.1%

Luzerne	Casey	61.5%
	McCorkel	37.8%
	Other	0.8%

Lycoming	Casey	55.7%
	McCorkel	42.4%
	Other	1.9%

McKean	Casey	41.2%
	McCorkel	57.9%
	Other	0.9%

Mercer	Casey	53.2%
	McCorkel	45.4%
	Other	1.4%

Mifflin	Casey	53.4%
	McCorkel	45.7%
	Other	1.0%

Monroe	Casey	51.8%
	McCorkel	46.6%
	Other	1.7%

Montgomery	Casey	42.6%
	McCorkel	56.2%
	Other	1.2%

Montour	Casey	58.8%
	McCorkel	39.9%
	Other	1.3%

Northampton	Casey	59.6%
	McCorkel	39.0%
	Other	1.4%

Northumberland	Casey	57.0%
	McCorkel	42.0%
	Other	1.0%

Perry	Casey	50.9%
	McCorkel	48.2%
	Other	0.9%

Philadelphia	Casey	63.8%
	McCorkel	35.1%
	Other	1.0%

Pike	Casey	36.6%
	McCorkel	61.0%
	Other	2.4%

Potter	Casey	44.3%
	McCorkel	54.8%
	Other	0.9%

Schuylkill	Casey	57.3%
	McCorkel	41.5%
	Other	1.3%

Snyder	Casey	38.4%
	McCorkel	60.2%
	Other	1.4%

Somerset	Casey	49.9%
	McCorkel	49.6%
	Other	0.6%

Sullivan	Casey	48.4%
	McCorkel	51.1%
	Other	0.6%

Susquehanna	Casey	44.0%
	McCorkel	52.4%
	Other	3.6%

Tioga	Casey	37.8%
	McCorkel	60.9%
	Other	1.3%

Union	Casey	43.2%
	McCorkel	54.8%
	Other	2.0%

Venango	Casey	50.1%
	McCorkel	48.6%
	Other	1.4%

Warren	Casey	48.3%
	McCorkel	50.5%
	Other	1.2%

Washington	Casey	65.3%
	McCorkel	33.3%
	Other	1.4%

Wayne	Casey	42.4%
	McCorkel	55.0%
	Other	2.6%

Westmoreland	Casey	62.2%
	McCorkel	36.3%
	Other	1.5%

Wyoming	Casey	52.0%
	McCorkel	47.1%
	Other	0.9%

York	Casey	47.8%
	McCorkel	50.9%
	Other	1.3%

National DataGraph for 1972 - Pennsylvania Results for 1972

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved