Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-07-10

Map

Map

Adair	Boren	61.0%
	Kamm	36.7%
	Other	2.3%

Alfalfa	Boren	59.3%
	Kamm	40.2%
	Other	0.5%

Atoka	Boren	74.6%
	Kamm	22.5%
	Other	2.8%

Beaver	Boren	42.6%
	Kamm	53.0%
	Other	4.4%

Beckham	Boren	73.2%
	Kamm	26.4%
	Other	0.4%

Blaine	Boren	62.4%
	Kamm	36.2%
	Other	1.4%

Bryan	Boren	77.7%
	Kamm	20.2%
	Other	2.1%

Caddo	Boren	76.1%
	Kamm	23.1%
	Other	0.8%

Canadian	Boren	66.1%
	Kamm	33.0%
	Other	1.0%

Carter	Boren	72.9%
	Kamm	25.8%
	Other	1.3%

Cherokee	Boren	65.6%
	Kamm	33.3%
	Other	1.2%

Choctaw	Boren	79.1%
	Kamm	18.8%
	Other	2.1%

Cimarron	Boren	53.3%
	Kamm	39.4%
	Other	7.3%

Cleveland	Boren	65.9%
	Kamm	32.3%
	Other	1.8%

Coal	Boren	74.8%
	Kamm	23.5%
	Other	1.6%

Comanche	Boren	72.8%
	Kamm	26.1%
	Other	1.1%

Cotton	Boren	73.5%
	Kamm	25.6%
	Other	0.9%

Craig	Boren	66.4%
	Kamm	32.2%
	Other	1.4%

Creek	Boren	63.9%
	Kamm	34.5%
	Other	1.6%

Custer	Boren	68.8%
	Kamm	30.5%
	Other	0.6%

Delaware	Boren	68.0%
	Kamm	29.4%
	Other	2.6%

Dewey	Boren	71.8%
	Kamm	27.1%
	Other	1.1%

Ellis	Boren	58.0%
	Kamm	37.5%
	Other	4.5%

Garfield	Boren	57.7%
	Kamm	41.4%
	Other	0.9%

Garvin	Boren	77.6%
	Kamm	21.5%
	Other	0.9%

Grady	Boren	72.6%
	Kamm	26.3%
	Other	1.1%

Grant	Boren	63.8%
	Kamm	35.5%
	Other	0.7%

Greer	Boren	80.0%
	Kamm	18.5%
	Other	1.5%

Harmon	Boren	86.2%
	Kamm	13.5%
	Other	0.3%

Harper	Boren	59.3%
	Kamm	36.6%
	Other	4.1%

Haskell	Boren	75.6%
	Kamm	22.6%
	Other	1.8%

Hughes	Boren	74.8%
	Kamm	24.5%
	Other	0.7%

Jackson	Boren	82.4%
	Kamm	16.4%
	Other	1.2%

Jefferson	Boren	76.8%
	Kamm	21.9%
	Other	1.2%

Johnston	Boren	71.8%
	Kamm	26.8%
	Other	1.4%

Kay	Boren	62.7%
	Kamm	36.5%
	Other	0.8%

Kingfisher	Boren	63.9%
	Kamm	35.4%
	Other	0.7%

Kiowa	Boren	73.6%
	Kamm	25.2%
	Other	1.2%

Latimer	Boren	71.9%
	Kamm	23.4%
	Other	4.8%

Le Flore	Boren	77.2%
	Kamm	18.8%
	Other	3.9%

Lincoln	Boren	65.2%
	Kamm	33.8%
	Other	1.0%

Logan	Boren	65.8%
	Kamm	33.1%
	Other	1.2%

Love	Boren	80.1%
	Kamm	18.4%
	Other	1.4%

McClain	Boren	73.8%
	Kamm	25.3%
	Other	0.9%

McCurtain	Boren	73.3%
	Kamm	21.3%
	Other	5.4%

McIntosh	Boren	69.6%
	Kamm	28.7%
	Other	1.7%

Major	Boren	49.5%
	Kamm	49.8%
	Other	0.7%

Marshall	Boren	74.0%
	Kamm	24.3%
	Other	1.8%

Mayes	Boren	66.6%
	Kamm	32.4%
	Other	0.9%

Murray	Boren	74.7%
	Kamm	24.0%
	Other	1.3%

Muskogee	Boren	66.4%
	Kamm	32.1%
	Other	1.5%

Noble	Boren	56.9%
	Kamm	42.1%
	Other	1.0%

Nowata	Boren	62.2%
	Kamm	36.5%
	Other	1.3%

Okfuskee	Boren	66.8%
	Kamm	30.2%
	Other	2.9%

Oklahoma	Boren	62.1%
	Kamm	35.4%
	Other	2.5%

Okmulgee	Boren	73.5%
	Kamm	25.5%
	Other	1.0%

Osage	Boren	69.1%
	Kamm	30.0%
	Other	0.9%

Ottawa	Boren	69.3%
	Kamm	29.3%
	Other	1.3%

Pawnee	Boren	59.6%
	Kamm	38.7%
	Other	1.6%

Payne	Boren	43.5%
	Kamm	55.4%
	Other	1.1%

Pittsburg	Boren	74.2%
	Kamm	24.1%
	Other	1.7%

Pontotoc	Boren	72.7%
	Kamm	26.5%
	Other	0.8%

Pottawatomie	Boren	69.6%
	Kamm	29.5%
	Other	0.9%

Pushmataha	Boren	71.2%
	Kamm	22.1%
	Other	6.8%

Roger Mills	Boren	72.0%
	Kamm	26.8%
	Other	1.2%

Rogers	Boren	65.5%
	Kamm	33.2%
	Other	1.3%

Seminole	Boren	75.9%
	Kamm	23.0%
	Other	1.1%

Sequoyah	Boren	73.1%
	Kamm	25.4%
	Other	1.5%

Stephens	Boren	75.0%
	Kamm	24.1%
	Other	0.9%

Texas	Boren	67.4%
	Kamm	31.1%
	Other	1.5%

Tillman	Boren	78.6%
	Kamm	20.6%
	Other	0.8%

Tulsa	Boren	59.4%
	Kamm	39.0%
	Other	1.7%

Wagoner	Boren	67.9%
	Kamm	31.0%
	Other	1.2%

Washington	Boren	56.7%
	Kamm	42.5%
	Other	0.8%

Washita	Boren	64.7%
	Kamm	34.2%
	Other	1.1%

Woods	Boren	67.1%
	Kamm	32.5%
	Other	0.5%

Woodward	Boren	59.4%
	Kamm	39.2%
	Other	1.4%

National DataGraph for 1978 - Oklahoma Results for 1978

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved