1990 Senatorial General Election Data Graphs - Illinois
by CountyAdams | Simon | 65.8% | |
Martin | 34.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Alexander | Simon | 77.4% | |
Martin | 22.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
Bond | Simon | 63.2% | |
Martin | 36.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Boone | Simon | 53.7% | |
Martin | 46.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
Brown | Simon | 64.0% | |
Martin | 36.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
Bureau | Simon | 62.8% | |
Martin | 37.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Calhoun | Simon | 68.9% | |
Martin | 31.1% | |
| 0.0% | |
Carroll | Simon | 57.0% | |
Martin | 43.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
Cass | Simon | 67.7% | |
Martin | 32.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
Champaign | Simon | 62.4% | |
Martin | 37.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
Christian | Simon | 69.2% | |
Martin | 30.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Clark | Simon | 53.5% | |
Martin | 46.5% | |
| 0.0% | |
Clay | Simon | 63.2% | |
Martin | 36.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Clinton | Simon | 62.0% | |
Martin | 38.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
Coles | Simon | 63.4% | |
Martin | 36.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
Cook | Simon | 71.2% | |
Martin | 28.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Crawford | Simon | 55.6% | |
Martin | 44.4% | |
| 0.0% | |
Cumberland | Simon | 56.9% | |
Martin | 43.1% | |
| 0.0% | |
DeKalb | Simon | 57.6% | |
Martin | 42.4% | |
| 0.0% | |
De Witt | Simon | 61.8% | |
Martin | 38.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Douglas | Simon | 60.8% | |
Martin | 39.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
DuPage | Simon | 50.2% | |
Martin | 49.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Edgar | Simon | 52.2% | |
Martin | 47.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Edwards | Simon | 48.3% | |
Martin | 51.7% | |
| 0.0% | |
Effingham | Simon | 62.2% | |
Martin | 37.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Fayette | Simon | 62.7% | |
Martin | 37.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
Ford | Simon | 50.9% | |
Martin | 49.1% | |
| 0.0% | |
Franklin | Simon | 78.2% | |
Martin | 21.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Fulton | Simon | 70.1% | |
Martin | 29.9% | |
| 0.0% | |
Gallatin | Simon | 80.0% | |
Martin | 20.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
Greene | Simon | 64.2% | |
Martin | 35.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Grundy | Simon | 58.3% | |
Martin | 41.7% | |
| 0.0% | |
Hamilton | Simon | 74.2% | |
Martin | 25.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Hancock | Simon | 64.2% | |
Martin | 35.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Hardin | Simon | 75.8% | |
Martin | 24.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Henderson | Simon | 65.6% | |
Martin | 34.4% | |
| 0.0% | |
Henry | Simon | 63.8% | |
Martin | 36.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Iroquois | Simon | 54.6% | |
Martin | 45.4% | |
| 0.0% | |
Jackson | Simon | 74.8% | |
Martin | 25.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Jasper | Simon | 59.2% | |
Martin | 40.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Jefferson | Simon | 69.5% | |
Martin | 30.5% | |
| 0.0% | |
Jersey | Simon | 65.6% | |
Martin | 34.4% | |
| 0.0% | |
Jo Daviess | Simon | 57.4% | |
Martin | 42.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
Johnson | Simon | 67.5% | |
Martin | 32.5% | |
| 0.0% | |
Kane | Simon | 55.3% | |
Martin | 44.7% | |
| 0.0% | |
Kankakee | Simon | 64.6% | |
Martin | 35.4% | |
| 0.0% | |
Kendall | Simon | 50.8% | |
Martin | 49.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Knox | Simon | 68.3% | |
Martin | 31.7% | |
| 0.0% | |
Lake | Simon | 55.9% | |
Martin | 44.1% | |
| 0.0% | |
LaSalle | Simon | 65.1% | |
Martin | 34.9% | |
| 0.0% | |
Lawrence | Simon | 58.8% | |
Martin | 41.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Lee | Simon | 53.4% | |
Martin | 46.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
Livingston | Simon | 54.0% | |
Martin | 46.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
Logan | Simon | 57.7% | |
Martin | 42.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
McDonough | Simon | 64.9% | |
Martin | 35.1% | |
| 0.0% | |
McHenry | Simon | 48.3% | |
Martin | 51.7% | |
| 0.0% | |
McLean | Simon | 57.8% | |
Martin | 42.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Macon | Simon | 67.8% | |
Martin | 32.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Macoupin | Simon | 67.8% | |
Martin | 32.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Madison | Simon | 67.7% | |
Martin | 32.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
Marion | Simon | 64.7% | |
Martin | 35.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
Marshall | Simon | 64.0% | |
Martin | 36.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
Mason | Simon | 69.1% | |
Martin | 30.9% | |
| 0.0% | |
Massac | Simon | 73.4% | |
Martin | 26.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
Menard | Simon | 56.1% | |
Martin | 43.9% | |
| 0.0% | |
Mercer | Simon | 66.3% | |
Martin | 33.7% | |
| 0.0% | |
Monroe | Simon | 60.5% | |
Martin | 39.5% | |
| 0.0% | |
Montgomery | Simon | 64.0% | |
Martin | 36.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
Morgan | Simon | 58.1% | |
Martin | 41.9% | |
| 0.0% | |
Moultrie | Simon | 67.2% | |
Martin | 32.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Ogle | Simon | 52.3% | |
Martin | 47.7% | |
| 0.0% | |
Peoria | Simon | 65.2% | |
Martin | 34.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Perry | Simon | 75.2% | |
Martin | 24.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Piatt | Simon | 62.6% | |
Martin | 37.4% | |
| 0.0% | |
Pike | Simon | 67.7% | |
Martin | 32.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
Pope | Simon | 69.5% | |
Martin | 30.5% | |
| 0.0% | |
Pulaski | Simon | 72.0% | |
Martin | 28.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
Putnam | Simon | 66.0% | |
Martin | 34.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
Randolph | Simon | 72.3% | |
Martin | 27.7% | |
| 0.0% | |
Richland | Simon | 53.7% | |
Martin | 46.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
Rock Island | Simon | 68.9% | |
Martin | 31.1% | |
| 0.0% | |
St. Clair | Simon | 68.2% | |
Martin | 31.8% | |
| 0.0% | |
Saline | Simon | 76.0% | |
Martin | 24.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
Sangamon | Simon | 60.7% | |
Martin | 39.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
Schuyler | Simon | 61.8% | |
Martin | 38.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Scott | Simon | 62.3% | |
Martin | 37.7% | |
| 0.0% | |
Shelby | Simon | 67.4% | |
Martin | 32.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
Stark | Simon | 61.9% | |
Martin | 38.1% | |
| 0.0% | |
Stephenson | Simon | 59.1% | |
Martin | 40.9% | |
| 0.0% | |
Tazewell | Simon | 63.6% | |
Martin | 36.4% | |
| 0.0% | |
Union | Simon | 75.7% | |
Martin | 24.3% | |
| 0.0% | |
Vermilion | Simon | 64.1% | |
Martin | 35.9% | |
| 0.0% | |
Wabash | Simon | 57.4% | |
Martin | 42.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
Warren | Simon | 60.0% | |
Martin | 40.0% | |
| 0.0% | |
Washington | Simon | 54.3% | |
Martin | 45.7% | |
| 0.0% | |
Wayne | Simon | 53.5% | |
Martin | 46.5% | |
| 0.0% | |
White | Simon | 62.5% | |
Martin | 37.5% | |
| 0.0% | |
Whiteside | Simon | 63.4% | |
Martin | 36.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
Will | Simon | 60.8% | |
Martin | 39.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Williamson | Simon | 74.8% | |
Martin | 25.2% | |
| 0.0% | |
Winnebago | Simon | 58.4% | |
Martin | 41.6% | |
| 0.0% | |
Woodford | Simon | 55.2% | |
Martin | 44.8% | |
| 0.0% | |