Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

1998 Gubernatorial General Election Data Graphs - Tennessee

by County

Map

Map

Anderson	Hooker	25.2%
	Sundquist	73.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Bedford	Hooker	27.4%
	Sundquist	69.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Benton	Hooker	36.3%
	Sundquist	60.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Bledsoe	Hooker	37.0%
	Sundquist	61.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Blount	Hooker	19.2%
	Sundquist	79.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Bradley	Hooker	17.6%
	Sundquist	80.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Campbell	Hooker	32.3%
	Sundquist	66.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Cannon	Hooker	34.6%
	Sundquist	62.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Carroll	Hooker	29.3%
	Sundquist	68.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Carter	Hooker	20.0%
	Sundquist	77.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Cheatham	Hooker	31.4%
	Sundquist	66.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Chester	Hooker	25.2%
	Sundquist	73.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Claiborne	Hooker	27.5%
	Sundquist	71.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Clay	Hooker	36.0%
	Sundquist	63.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Cocke	Hooker	18.9%
	Sundquist	78.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Coffee	Hooker	28.9%
	Sundquist	69.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Crockett	Hooker	31.5%
	Sundquist	66.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Cumberland	Hooker	25.0%
	Sundquist	74.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.0%

Davidson	Hooker	40.1%
	Sundquist	57.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Decatur	Hooker	37.3%
	Sundquist	61.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

DeKalb	Hooker	31.7%
	Sundquist	65.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Dickson	Hooker	34.8%
	Sundquist	62.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.5%

Dyer	Hooker	32.7%
	Sundquist	64.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Fayette	Hooker	26.9%
	Sundquist	70.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Fentress	Hooker	35.2%
	Sundquist	63.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Franklin	Hooker	32.3%
	Sundquist	65.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Gibson	Hooker	26.7%
	Sundquist	71.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Giles	Hooker	38.7%
	Sundquist	59.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Grainger	Hooker	26.5%
	Sundquist	72.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Greene	Hooker	21.2%
	Sundquist	76.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Grundy	Hooker	46.5%
	Sundquist	51.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Hamblen	Hooker	22.8%
	Sundquist	75.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Hamilton	Hooker	24.4%
	Sundquist	73.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Hancock	Hooker	25.5%
	Sundquist	73.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Hardeman	Hooker	36.6%
	Sundquist	60.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Hardin	Hooker	30.1%
	Sundquist	67.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Hawkins	Hooker	22.5%
	Sundquist	75.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Haywood	Hooker	36.3%
	Sundquist	61.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Henderson	Hooker	22.8%
	Sundquist	75.4%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Henry	Hooker	32.6%
	Sundquist	65.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Hickman	Hooker	40.4%
	Sundquist	56.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Houston	Hooker	45.3%
	Sundquist	52.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Humphreys	Hooker	39.6%
	Sundquist	57.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Jackson	Hooker	42.6%
	Sundquist	56.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Jefferson	Hooker	20.6%
	Sundquist	77.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Johnson	Hooker	23.6%
	Sundquist	74.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Knox	Hooker	23.7%
	Sundquist	74.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Lake	Hooker	60.9%
	Sundquist	37.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Lauderdale	Hooker	38.8%
	Sundquist	58.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Lawrence	Hooker	31.6%
	Sundquist	67.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Lewis	Hooker	35.3%
	Sundquist	62.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Lincoln	Hooker	32.8%
	Sundquist	65.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Loudon	Hooker	18.6%
	Sundquist	80.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

McMinn	Hooker	21.6%
	Sundquist	76.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

McNairy	Hooker	29.7%
	Sundquist	68.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Macon	Hooker	23.0%
	Sundquist	75.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.2%

Madison	Hooker	25.7%
	Sundquist	72.7%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Marion	Hooker	42.0%
	Sundquist	56.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Marshall	Hooker	34.3%
	Sundquist	63.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Maury	Hooker	28.8%
	Sundquist	69.0%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Meigs	Hooker	32.4%
	Sundquist	66.2%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Monroe	Hooker	28.1%
	Sundquist	70.5%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Montgomery	Hooker	23.0%
	Sundquist	75.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Moore	Hooker	23.4%
	Sundquist	75.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Morgan	Hooker	48.6%
	Sundquist	49.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Obion	Hooker	34.3%
	Sundquist	61.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Overton	Hooker	47.2%
	Sundquist	51.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Perry	Hooker	45.1%
	Sundquist	53.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Pickett	Hooker	28.9%
	Sundquist	70.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Polk	Hooker	40.7%
	Sundquist	58.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Putnam	Hooker	26.2%
	Sundquist	71.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Rhea	Hooker	24.6%
	Sundquist	74.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Roane	Hooker	28.5%
	Sundquist	69.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Robertson	Hooker	31.3%
	Sundquist	66.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

Rutherford	Hooker	28.5%
	Sundquist	69.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Scott	Hooker	29.3%
	Sundquist	69.0%
		0.0%
	Other	1.7%

Sequatchie	Hooker	33.4%
	Sundquist	64.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.8%

Sevier	Hooker	17.0%
	Sundquist	81.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Shelby	Hooker	37.5%
	Sundquist	60.9%
		0.0%
	Other	1.6%

Smith	Hooker	38.8%
	Sundquist	59.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.0%

Stewart	Hooker	36.8%
	Sundquist	60.3%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Sullivan	Hooker	20.4%
	Sundquist	78.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.4%

Sumner	Hooker	25.8%
	Sundquist	72.3%
		0.0%
	Other	1.9%

Tipton	Hooker	22.9%
	Sundquist	74.5%
		0.0%
	Other	2.6%

Trousdale	Hooker	39.8%
	Sundquist	58.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.1%

Unicoi	Hooker	18.8%
	Sundquist	78.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.8%

Union	Hooker	28.6%
	Sundquist	69.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

Van Buren	Hooker	49.5%
	Sundquist	49.1%
		0.0%
	Other	1.5%

Warren	Hooker	32.4%
	Sundquist	65.4%
		0.0%
	Other	2.2%

Washington	Hooker	19.7%
	Sundquist	77.6%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Wayne	Hooker	29.9%
	Sundquist	68.8%
		0.0%
	Other	1.3%

Weakley	Hooker	31.8%
	Sundquist	65.8%
		0.0%
	Other	2.4%

White	Hooker	32.3%
	Sundquist	64.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Williamson	Hooker	19.3%
	Sundquist	79.6%
		0.0%
	Other	1.1%

Wilson	Hooker	27.1%
	Sundquist	70.7%
		0.0%
	Other	2.3%

National DataGraph for 1998 - Tennessee Results for 1998

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved

Note: The advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.