Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-01-02

Map

Map

Adair	Askins	51.5%
	Hiett	45.5%
	Other	3.0%

Alfalfa	Askins	42.6%
	Hiett	55.2%
	Other	2.2%

Atoka	Askins	56.0%
	Hiett	40.4%
	Other	3.5%

Beaver	Askins	28.0%
	Hiett	69.3%
	Other	2.7%

Beckham	Askins	54.0%
	Hiett	43.9%
	Other	2.1%

Blaine	Askins	47.6%
	Hiett	49.5%
	Other	3.0%

Bryan	Askins	58.6%
	Hiett	38.9%
	Other	2.5%

Caddo	Askins	58.4%
	Hiett	39.6%
	Other	2.0%

Canadian	Askins	39.7%
	Hiett	57.9%
	Other	2.5%

Carter	Askins	49.1%
	Hiett	48.4%
	Other	2.5%

Cherokee	Askins	61.3%
	Hiett	35.8%
	Other	2.9%

Choctaw	Askins	63.8%
	Hiett	33.6%
	Other	2.6%

Cimarron	Askins	28.5%
	Hiett	65.8%
	Other	5.6%

Cleveland	Askins	49.4%
	Hiett	48.1%
	Other	2.5%

Coal	Askins	63.5%
	Hiett	33.4%
	Other	3.1%

Comanche	Askins	53.6%
	Hiett	44.0%
	Other	2.4%

Cotton	Askins	63.8%
	Hiett	33.8%
	Other	2.4%

Craig	Askins	60.6%
	Hiett	37.3%
	Other	2.1%

Creek	Askins	44.2%
	Hiett	53.6%
	Other	2.2%

Custer	Askins	50.1%
	Hiett	47.4%
	Other	2.5%

Delaware	Askins	51.7%
	Hiett	45.8%
	Other	2.5%

Dewey	Askins	45.4%
	Hiett	51.6%
	Other	3.0%

Ellis	Askins	42.0%
	Hiett	54.9%
	Other	3.1%

Garfield	Askins	41.3%
	Hiett	56.3%
	Other	2.4%

Garvin	Askins	53.9%
	Hiett	43.7%
	Other	2.4%

Grady	Askins	50.2%
	Hiett	47.4%
	Other	2.4%

Grant	Askins	45.1%
	Hiett	52.1%
	Other	2.8%

Greer	Askins	56.9%
	Hiett	41.1%
	Other	1.9%

Harmon	Askins	61.6%
	Hiett	37.3%
	Other	1.1%

Harper	Askins	43.7%
	Hiett	54.3%
	Other	2.0%

Haskell	Askins	63.1%
	Hiett	34.1%
	Other	2.8%

Hughes	Askins	60.8%
	Hiett	36.8%
	Other	2.4%

Jackson	Askins	44.6%
	Hiett	53.5%
	Other	1.9%

Jefferson	Askins	62.0%
	Hiett	35.6%
	Other	2.4%

Johnston	Askins	60.4%
	Hiett	36.9%
	Other	2.7%

Kay	Askins	45.1%
	Hiett	52.4%
	Other	2.6%

Kingfisher	Askins	37.5%
	Hiett	60.3%
	Other	2.1%

Kiowa	Askins	60.8%
	Hiett	37.6%
	Other	1.7%

Latimer	Askins	63.7%
	Hiett	33.2%
	Other	3.2%

Le Flore	Askins	62.5%
	Hiett	34.8%
	Other	2.8%

Lincoln	Askins	47.2%
	Hiett	50.1%
	Other	2.7%

Logan	Askins	42.4%
	Hiett	54.9%
	Other	2.7%

Love	Askins	57.2%
	Hiett	40.6%
	Other	2.1%

McClain	Askins	45.6%
	Hiett	52.0%
	Other	2.4%

McCurtain	Askins	63.1%
	Hiett	34.6%
	Other	2.3%

McIntosh	Askins	63.6%
	Hiett	33.7%
	Other	2.6%

Major	Askins	34.9%
	Hiett	62.9%
	Other	2.3%

Marshall	Askins	53.0%
	Hiett	44.0%
	Other	3.0%

Mayes	Askins	57.4%
	Hiett	40.1%
	Other	2.5%

Murray	Askins	59.4%
	Hiett	38.2%
	Other	2.4%

Muskogee	Askins	62.6%
	Hiett	35.2%
	Other	2.2%

Noble	Askins	44.4%
	Hiett	52.9%
	Other	2.8%

Nowata	Askins	52.4%
	Hiett	45.0%
	Other	2.6%

Okfuskee	Askins	61.2%
	Hiett	36.4%
	Other	2.4%

Oklahoma	Askins	48.3%
	Hiett	49.4%
	Other	2.3%

Okmulgee	Askins	61.8%
	Hiett	35.9%
	Other	2.4%

Osage	Askins	56.9%
	Hiett	40.5%
	Other	2.6%

Ottawa	Askins	62.3%
	Hiett	34.9%
	Other	2.8%

Pawnee	Askins	52.3%
	Hiett	44.8%
	Other	3.0%

Payne	Askins	50.0%
	Hiett	47.4%
	Other	2.6%

Pittsburg	Askins	59.8%
	Hiett	37.2%
	Other	3.0%

Pontotoc	Askins	55.6%
	Hiett	41.8%
	Other	2.6%

Pottawatomie	Askins	53.4%
	Hiett	44.1%
	Other	2.4%

Pushmataha	Askins	62.2%
	Hiett	35.2%
	Other	2.6%

Roger Mills	Askins	46.6%
	Hiett	51.0%
	Other	2.4%

Rogers	Askins	48.5%
	Hiett	49.3%
	Other	2.2%

Seminole	Askins	57.2%
	Hiett	40.3%
	Other	2.6%

Sequoyah	Askins	61.3%
	Hiett	35.9%
	Other	2.8%

Stephens	Askins	62.7%
	Hiett	35.8%
	Other	1.4%

Texas	Askins	30.7%
	Hiett	66.3%
	Other	3.0%

Tillman	Askins	59.3%
	Hiett	38.6%
	Other	2.1%

Tulsa	Askins	46.7%
	Hiett	51.3%
	Other	2.0%

Wagoner	Askins	47.5%
	Hiett	50.4%
	Other	2.1%

Washington	Askins	40.5%
	Hiett	57.4%
	Other	2.1%

Washita	Askins	52.7%
	Hiett	44.7%
	Other	2.6%

Woods	Askins	44.9%
	Hiett	52.8%
	Other	2.3%

Woodward	Askins	41.1%
	Hiett	56.6%
	Other	2.2%

National DataGraph for 2006 - Oklahoma Results for 2006

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved