Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-07-11

Map

Map

Adair	Hanigar	21.9%
	Jones	78.1%

Alfalfa	Hanigar	28.4%
	Jones	71.6%

Atoka	Hanigar	35.1%
	Jones	64.9%

Beaver	Hanigar	28.6%
	Jones	71.4%

Beckham	Hanigar	26.6%
	Jones	73.4%

Blaine	Hanigar	29.3%
	Jones	70.7%

Bryan	Hanigar	24.5%
	Jones	75.5%

Caddo	Hanigar	28.8%
	Jones	71.2%

Canadian	Hanigar	30.4%
	Jones	69.6%

Carter	Hanigar	27.0%
	Jones	73.0%

Cherokee	Hanigar	28.1%
	Jones	71.9%

Choctaw	Hanigar	30.3%
	Jones	69.7%

Cimarron	Hanigar	33.1%
	Jones	66.9%

Cleveland	Hanigar	28.5%
	Jones	71.5%

Coal	Hanigar	28.8%
	Jones	71.2%

Comanche	Hanigar	29.9%
	Jones	70.1%

Cotton	Hanigar	34.5%
	Jones	65.5%

Craig	Hanigar	23.2%
	Jones	76.8%

Creek	Hanigar	29.8%
	Jones	70.2%

Custer	Hanigar	24.2%
	Jones	75.8%

Delaware	Hanigar	25.6%
	Jones	74.4%

Dewey	Hanigar	31.1%
	Jones	68.9%

Ellis	Hanigar	30.7%
	Jones	69.3%

Garfield	Hanigar	26.4%
	Jones	73.6%

Garvin	Hanigar	23.9%
	Jones	76.1%

Grady	Hanigar	30.1%
	Jones	69.9%

Grant	Hanigar	30.6%
	Jones	69.4%

Greer	Hanigar	28.1%
	Jones	71.9%

Harmon	Hanigar	26.2%
	Jones	73.8%

Harper	Hanigar	30.2%
	Jones	69.8%

Haskell	Hanigar	18.9%
	Jones	81.1%

Hughes	Hanigar	25.2%
	Jones	74.8%

Jackson	Hanigar	24.5%
	Jones	75.5%

Jefferson	Hanigar	24.7%
	Jones	75.3%

Johnston	Hanigar	26.3%
	Jones	73.7%

Kay	Hanigar	31.2%
	Jones	68.8%

Kingfisher	Hanigar	26.3%
	Jones	73.7%

Kiowa	Hanigar	27.3%
	Jones	72.7%

Latimer	Hanigar	36.0%
	Jones	64.0%

Le Flore	Hanigar	29.9%
	Jones	70.1%

Lincoln	Hanigar	26.6%
	Jones	73.4%

Logan	Hanigar	27.2%
	Jones	72.8%

Love	Hanigar	27.2%
	Jones	72.8%

McClain	Hanigar	29.1%
	Jones	70.9%

McCurtain	Hanigar	32.1%
	Jones	67.9%

McIntosh	Hanigar	26.8%
	Jones	73.2%

Major	Hanigar	29.6%
	Jones	70.4%

Marshall	Hanigar	25.5%
	Jones	74.5%

Mayes	Hanigar	28.5%
	Jones	71.5%

Murray	Hanigar	27.5%
	Jones	72.5%

Muskogee	Hanigar	24.3%
	Jones	75.7%

Noble	Hanigar	28.8%
	Jones	71.2%

Nowata	Hanigar	31.8%
	Jones	68.2%

Okfuskee	Hanigar	30.5%
	Jones	69.5%

Oklahoma	Hanigar	31.0%
	Jones	69.0%

Okmulgee	Hanigar	31.8%
	Jones	68.2%

Osage	Hanigar	32.8%
	Jones	67.2%

Ottawa	Hanigar	33.0%
	Jones	67.0%

Pawnee	Hanigar	33.0%
	Jones	67.0%

Payne	Hanigar	30.5%
	Jones	69.5%

Pittsburg	Hanigar	34.2%
	Jones	65.8%

Pontotoc	Hanigar	27.6%
	Jones	72.4%

Pottawatomie	Hanigar	41.0%
	Jones	59.0%

Pushmataha	Hanigar	37.3%
	Jones	62.7%

Roger Mills	Hanigar	29.0%
	Jones	71.0%

Rogers	Hanigar	31.5%
	Jones	68.5%

Seminole	Hanigar	30.2%
	Jones	69.8%

Sequoyah	Hanigar	29.9%
	Jones	70.1%

Stephens	Hanigar	25.4%
	Jones	74.6%

Texas	Hanigar	29.9%
	Jones	70.1%

Tillman	Hanigar	25.8%
	Jones	74.2%

Tulsa	Hanigar	31.7%
	Jones	68.3%

Wagoner	Hanigar	33.7%
	Jones	66.3%

Washington	Hanigar	39.1%
	Jones	60.9%

Washita	Hanigar	31.5%
	Jones	68.5%

Woods	Hanigar	33.3%
	Jones	66.7%

Woodward	Hanigar	28.7%
	Jones	71.3%

National DataGraph for 2010 - Oklahoma Results for 2010

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved