Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2020-05-03

Map

Map

Alamance		0.0%
	Forest	89.7%
	Other	10.3%

Alexander		0.0%
	Forest	92.6%
	Other	7.4%

Alleghany		0.0%
	Forest	91.6%
	Other	8.4%

Anson		0.0%
	Forest	94.5%
	Other	5.5%

Ashe		0.0%
	Forest	91.6%
	Other	8.4%

Avery		0.0%
	Forest	90.8%
	Other	9.2%

Beaufort		0.0%
	Forest	91.9%
	Other	8.1%

Bertie		0.0%
	Forest	93.9%
	Other	6.1%

Bladen		0.0%
	Forest	95.9%
	Other	4.1%

Brunswick		0.0%
	Forest	83.4%
	Other	16.6%

Buncombe		0.0%
	Forest	85.6%
	Other	14.4%

Burke		0.0%
	Forest	91.5%
	Other	8.5%

Cabarrus		0.0%
	Forest	88.7%
	Other	11.3%

Caldwell		0.0%
	Forest	91.5%
	Other	8.5%

Camden		0.0%
	Forest	91.7%
	Other	8.3%

Carteret		0.0%
	Forest	90.6%
	Other	9.4%

Caswell		0.0%
	Forest	92.1%
	Other	7.9%

Catawba		0.0%
	Forest	89.4%
	Other	10.6%

Chatham		0.0%
	Forest	88.5%
	Other	11.5%

Cherokee		0.0%
	Forest	84.2%
	Other	15.8%

Chowan		0.0%
	Forest	94.8%
	Other	5.2%

Clay		0.0%
	Forest	87.4%
	Other	12.6%

Cleveland		0.0%
	Forest	93.0%
	Other	7.0%

Columbus		0.0%
	Forest	93.1%
	Other	6.9%

Craven		0.0%
	Forest	91.4%
	Other	8.6%

Cumberland		0.0%
	Forest	87.6%
	Other	12.4%

Currituck		0.0%
	Forest	85.1%
	Other	14.9%

Dare		0.0%
	Forest	88.6%
	Other	11.4%

Davidson		0.0%
	Forest	89.7%
	Other	10.3%

Davie		0.0%
	Forest	91.3%
	Other	8.7%

Duplin		0.0%
	Forest	95.2%
	Other	4.8%

Durham		0.0%
	Forest	84.6%
	Other	15.4%

Edgecombe		0.0%
	Forest	92.1%
	Other	7.9%

Forsyth		0.0%
	Forest	86.6%
	Other	13.4%

Franklin		0.0%
	Forest	92.2%
	Other	7.8%

Gaston		0.0%
	Forest	90.3%
	Other	9.7%

Gates		0.0%
	Forest	87.2%
	Other	12.8%

Graham		0.0%
	Forest	93.5%
	Other	6.5%

Granville		0.0%
	Forest	91.4%
	Other	8.6%

Greene		0.0%
	Forest	94.0%
	Other	6.0%

Guilford		0.0%
	Forest	87.5%
	Other	12.5%

Halifax		0.0%
	Forest	93.5%
	Other	6.5%

Harnett		0.0%
	Forest	90.8%
	Other	9.2%

Haywood		0.0%
	Forest	87.5%
	Other	12.5%

Henderson		0.0%
	Forest	90.3%
	Other	9.7%

Hertford		0.0%
	Forest	91.7%
	Other	8.3%

Hoke		0.0%
	Forest	86.5%
	Other	13.5%

Hyde		0.0%
	Forest	91.0%
	Other	9.0%

Iredell		0.0%
	Forest	87.5%
	Other	12.5%

Jackson		0.0%
	Forest	86.6%
	Other	13.4%

Johnston		0.0%
	Forest	91.6%
	Other	8.4%

Jones		0.0%
	Forest	95.1%
	Other	4.9%

Lee		0.0%
	Forest	91.4%
	Other	8.6%

Lenoir		0.0%
	Forest	94.2%
	Other	5.8%

Lincoln		0.0%
	Forest	89.6%
	Other	10.4%

McDowell		0.0%
	Forest	91.7%
	Other	8.3%

Macon		0.0%
	Forest	88.2%
	Other	11.8%

Madison		0.0%
	Forest	89.5%
	Other	10.5%

Martin		0.0%
	Forest	94.2%
	Other	5.8%

Mecklenburg		0.0%
	Forest	84.2%
	Other	15.8%

Mitchell		0.0%
	Forest	89.9%
	Other	10.1%

Montgomery		0.0%
	Forest	93.0%
	Other	7.0%

Moore		0.0%
	Forest	88.4%
	Other	11.6%

Nash		0.0%
	Forest	94.3%
	Other	5.7%

New Hanover		0.0%
	Forest	72.5%
	Other	27.5%

Northampton		0.0%
	Forest	91.5%
	Other	8.5%

Onslow		0.0%
	Forest	87.5%
	Other	12.5%

Orange		0.0%
	Forest	85.9%
	Other	14.1%

Pamlico		0.0%
	Forest	93.6%
	Other	6.4%

Pasquotank		0.0%
	Forest	93.5%
	Other	6.5%

Pender		0.0%
	Forest	88.0%
	Other	12.0%

Perquimans		0.0%
	Forest	93.1%
	Other	6.9%

Person		0.0%
	Forest	93.1%
	Other	6.9%

Pitt		0.0%
	Forest	91.1%
	Other	8.9%

Polk		0.0%
	Forest	91.1%
	Other	8.9%

Randolph		0.0%
	Forest	92.3%
	Other	7.7%

Richmond		0.0%
	Forest	90.9%
	Other	9.1%

Robeson		0.0%
	Forest	89.2%
	Other	10.8%

Rockingham		0.0%
	Forest	92.3%
	Other	7.7%

Rowan		0.0%
	Forest	90.8%
	Other	9.2%

Rutherford		0.0%
	Forest	90.1%
	Other	9.9%

Sampson		0.0%
	Forest	95.0%
	Other	5.0%

Scotland		0.0%
	Forest	90.0%
	Other	10.0%

Stanly		0.0%
	Forest	90.4%
	Other	9.6%

Stokes		0.0%
	Forest	92.4%
	Other	7.6%

Surry		0.0%
	Forest	91.1%
	Other	8.9%

Swain		0.0%
	Forest	89.1%
	Other	10.9%

Transylvania		0.0%
	Forest	87.0%
	Other	13.0%

Tyrrell		0.0%
	Forest	94.7%
	Other	5.3%

Union		0.0%
	Forest	91.4%
	Other	8.6%

Vance		0.0%
	Forest	91.6%
	Other	8.4%

Wake		0.0%
	Forest	86.6%
	Other	13.4%

Warren		0.0%
	Forest	90.3%
	Other	9.7%

Washington		0.0%
	Forest	94.4%
	Other	5.6%

Watauga		0.0%
	Forest	89.2%
	Other	10.8%

Wayne		0.0%
	Forest	92.4%
	Other	7.6%

Wilkes		0.0%
	Forest	92.2%
	Other	7.8%

Wilson		0.0%
	Forest	92.4%
	Other	7.6%

Yadkin		0.0%
	Forest	93.3%
	Other	6.7%

Yancey		0.0%
	Forest	93.3%
	Other	6.7%

National DataGraph for 2020 - North Carolina Results for 2020

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved