2022 Gubernatorial General Election Data Graphs - Illinois

by County


Map

AdamsPritzker20.1%
 
Bailey77.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


AlexanderPritzker40.9%
 
Bailey57.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.2%
 


BondPritzker26.0%
 
Bailey70.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


BoonePritzker38.5%
 
Bailey58.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.6%
 


BrownPritzker15.8%
 
Bailey82.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


BureauPritzker36.3%
 
Bailey60.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


CalhounPritzker24.4%
 
Bailey72.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.9%
 


CarrollPritzker31.0%
 
Bailey65.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


CassPritzker27.5%
 
Bailey69.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.9%
 


ChampaignPritzker58.8%
 
Bailey38.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.9%
 


ChristianPritzker27.6%
 
Bailey68.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.5%
 


ClarkPritzker19.0%
 
Bailey79.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


ClayPritzker13.4%
 
Bailey85.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


ClintonPritzker20.9%
 
Bailey76.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


ColesPritzker33.4%
 
Bailey63.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.7%
 


CookPritzker73.8%
 
Bailey23.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.2%
 


CrawfordPritzker19.6%
 
Bailey77.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


CumberlandPritzker18.1%
 
Bailey79.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.2%
 


DeKalbPritzker49.4%
 
Bailey46.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.8%
 


De WittPritzker26.0%
 
Bailey70.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


DouglasPritzker23.9%
 
Bailey73.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


DuPagePritzker56.0%
 
Bailey40.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


EdgarPritzker22.2%
 
Bailey75.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


EdwardsPritzker10.5%
 
Bailey88.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


EffinghamPritzker16.3%
 
Bailey81.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


FayettePritzker16.0%
 
Bailey82.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.9%
 


FordPritzker23.8%
 
Bailey73.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


FranklinPritzker21.5%
 
Bailey76.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.6%
 


FultonPritzker37.4%
 
Bailey59.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.5%
 


GallatinPritzker19.9%
 
Bailey76.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


GreenePritzker20.7%
 
Bailey77.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


GrundyPritzker35.9%
 
Bailey60.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.7%
 


HamiltonPritzker16.7%
 
Bailey81.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.8%
 


HancockPritzker19.8%
 
Bailey77.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.7%
 


HardinPritzker16.9%
 
Bailey79.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.6%
 


HendersonPritzker29.8%
 
Bailey66.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.3%
 


HenryPritzker35.2%
 
Bailey61.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


IroquoisPritzker18.5%
 
Bailey79.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


JacksonPritzker48.5%
 
Bailey48.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.7%
 


JasperPritzker13.8%
 
Bailey84.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.6%
 


JeffersonPritzker21.3%
 
Bailey76.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.3%
 


JerseyPritzker23.1%
 
Bailey74.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.9%
 


Jo DaviessPritzker39.4%
 
Bailey57.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


JohnsonPritzker17.9%
 
Bailey80.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.0%
 


KanePritzker53.7%
 
Bailey43.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


KankakeePritzker37.6%
 
Bailey59.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.3%
 


KendallPritzker49.1%
 
Bailey47.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.5%
 


KnoxPritzker42.5%
 
Bailey54.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.0%
 


LakePritzker60.2%
 
Bailey36.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


LaSallePritzker41.7%
 
Bailey54.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.4%
 


LawrencePritzker17.8%
 
Bailey80.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.2%
 


LeePritzker37.7%
 
Bailey59.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


LivingstonPritzker25.1%
 
Bailey72.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


LoganPritzker28.0%
 
Bailey69.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.7%
 


McDonoughPritzker34.5%
 
Bailey62.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.7%
 


McHenryPritzker47.4%
 
Bailey48.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.8%
 


McLeanPritzker49.2%
 
Bailey47.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.9%
 


MaconPritzker38.9%
 
Bailey58.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


MacoupinPritzker30.7%
 
Bailey66.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.9%
 


MadisonPritzker40.6%
 
Bailey56.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


MarionPritzker22.0%
 
Bailey75.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.2%
 


MarshallPritzker30.8%
 
Bailey66.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


MasonPritzker29.3%
 
Bailey67.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.5%
 


MassacPritzker21.4%
 
Bailey76.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


MenardPritzker29.6%
 
Bailey67.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.4%
 


MercerPritzker33.8%
 
Bailey62.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.7%
 


MonroePritzker29.3%
 
Bailey67.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.0%
 


MontgomeryPritzker28.2%
 
Bailey68.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


MorganPritzker31.3%
 
Bailey66.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


MoultriePritzker23.5%
 
Bailey73.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.7%
 


OglePritzker33.3%
 
Bailey63.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


PeoriaPritzker49.5%
 
Bailey47.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


PerryPritzker23.3%
 
Bailey74.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.6%
 


PiattPritzker33.8%
 
Bailey62.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.8%
 


PikePritzker16.0%
 
Bailey81.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.3%
 


PopePritzker18.0%
 
Bailey80.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


PulaskiPritzker28.8%
 
Bailey69.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


PutnamPritzker38.6%
 
Bailey58.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.4%
 


RandolphPritzker26.2%
 
Bailey70.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.1%
 


RichlandPritzker18.8%
 
Bailey78.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


Rock IslandPritzker53.2%
 
Bailey43.8%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.0%
 


St. ClairPritzker50.7%
 
Bailey46.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.0%
 


SalinePritzker21.4%
 
Bailey76.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


SangamonPritzker47.9%
 
Bailey49.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


SchuylerPritzker25.3%
 
Bailey71.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


ScottPritzker17.9%
 
Bailey80.4%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


ShelbyPritzker19.3%
 
Bailey78.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.5%
 


StarkPritzker25.4%
 
Bailey70.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other4.1%
 


StephensonPritzker37.6%
 
Bailey59.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.3%
 


TazewellPritzker33.8%
 
Bailey63.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.0%
 


UnionPritzker26.2%
 
Bailey71.0%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.8%
 


VermilionPritzker30.5%
 
Bailey66.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.0%
 


WabashPritzker17.9%
 
Bailey80.6%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.5%
 


WarrenPritzker34.1%
 
Bailey63.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.6%
 


WashingtonPritzker19.4%
 
Bailey77.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.7%
 


WaynePritzker9.4%
 
Bailey88.9%
 
0.0%
 
Other1.7%
 


WhitePritzker15.2%
 
Bailey82.7%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.1%
 


WhitesidePritzker41.5%
 
Bailey55.2%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


WillPritzker50.3%
 
Bailey46.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.2%
 


WilliamsonPritzker27.1%
 
Bailey70.5%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.4%
 


WinnebagoPritzker47.6%
 
Bailey49.3%
 
0.0%
 
Other3.0%
 


WoodfordPritzker25.5%
 
Bailey72.1%
 
0.0%
 
Other2.3%
 



National DataGraph for 2022 - Illinois Results for 2022

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies


© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved

Note: The advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.