Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Aurora	Bengs	14.0%
	Thune	80.6%
		0.0%
	Other	5.4%

Beadle	Bengs	20.8%
	Thune	76.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Bennett	Bengs	28.9%
	Thune	67.1%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Bon Homme	Bengs	17.7%
	Thune	78.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Brookings	Bengs	30.9%
	Thune	64.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Brown	Bengs	28.0%
	Thune	68.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Brule	Bengs	20.4%
	Thune	75.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Buffalo	Bengs	51.8%
	Thune	44.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Butte	Bengs	14.4%
	Thune	78.6%
		0.0%
	Other	7.0%

Campbell	Bengs	10.0%
	Thune	86.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Charles Mix	Bengs	21.6%
	Thune	75.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Clark	Bengs	14.4%
	Thune	82.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Clay	Bengs	43.3%
	Thune	53.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Codington	Bengs	20.6%
	Thune	75.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Corson	Bengs	36.1%
	Thune	57.7%
		0.0%
	Other	6.2%

Custer	Bengs	20.2%
	Thune	74.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Davison	Bengs	21.1%
	Thune	75.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.7%

Day	Bengs	23.9%
	Thune	71.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Deuel	Bengs	17.4%
	Thune	77.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Dewey	Bengs	46.2%
	Thune	49.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Douglas	Bengs	8.0%
	Thune	89.2%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Edmunds	Bengs	15.0%
	Thune	82.1%
		0.0%
	Other	2.9%

Fall River	Bengs	18.3%
	Thune	75.6%
		0.0%
	Other	6.1%

Faulk	Bengs	12.7%
	Thune	82.4%
		0.0%
	Other	5.0%

Grant	Bengs	18.8%
	Thune	77.9%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Gregory	Bengs	13.8%
	Thune	82.2%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Haakon	Bengs	5.8%
	Thune	89.1%
		0.0%
	Other	5.2%

Hamlin	Bengs	13.5%
	Thune	81.9%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Hand	Bengs	13.1%
	Thune	82.3%
		0.0%
	Other	4.6%

Hanson	Bengs	15.6%
	Thune	81.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.2%

Harding	Bengs	3.3%
	Thune	90.6%
		0.0%
	Other	6.1%

Hughes	Bengs	22.6%
	Thune	73.4%
		0.0%
	Other	4.0%

Hutchinson	Bengs	13.3%
	Thune	83.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Hyde	Bengs	13.4%
	Thune	83.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.1%

Jackson	Bengs	23.9%
	Thune	68.6%
		0.0%
	Other	7.5%

Jerauld	Bengs	17.8%
	Thune	78.2%
		0.0%
	Other	3.9%

Jones	Bengs	9.9%
	Thune	82.4%
		0.0%
	Other	7.7%

Kingsbury	Bengs	17.4%
	Thune	79.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.5%

Lake	Bengs	23.2%
	Thune	73.5%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Lawrence	Bengs	25.2%
	Thune	69.5%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Lincoln	Bengs	26.3%
	Thune	70.4%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Lyman	Bengs	22.3%
	Thune	72.7%
		0.0%
	Other	5.0%

McCook	Bengs	16.1%
	Thune	80.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

McPherson	Bengs	9.8%
	Thune	86.6%
		0.0%
	Other	3.6%

Marshall	Bengs	29.0%
	Thune	67.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.3%

Meade	Bengs	18.1%
	Thune	75.9%
		0.0%
	Other	6.0%

Mellette	Bengs	26.4%
	Thune	66.5%
		0.0%
	Other	7.1%

Miner	Bengs	16.0%
	Thune	81.0%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Minnehaha	Bengs	33.4%
	Thune	62.8%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Moody	Bengs	26.3%
	Thune	69.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.1%

Pennington	Bengs	27.6%
	Thune	67.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Perkins	Bengs	9.7%
	Thune	83.3%
		0.0%
	Other	6.9%

Potter	Bengs	11.3%
	Thune	85.7%
		0.0%
	Other	3.0%

Roberts	Bengs	28.3%
	Thune	67.5%
		0.0%
	Other	4.2%

Sanborn	Bengs	15.4%
	Thune	81.9%
		0.0%
	Other	2.7%

Oglala Lakota	Bengs	77.4%
	Thune	17.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Spink	Bengs	20.5%
	Thune	76.1%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Stanley	Bengs	16.9%
	Thune	78.6%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Sully	Bengs	14.6%
	Thune	79.4%
		0.0%
	Other	6.0%

Todd	Bengs	68.4%
	Thune	26.3%
		0.0%
	Other	5.3%

Tripp	Bengs	11.8%
	Thune	83.2%
		0.0%
	Other	5.1%

Turner	Bengs	15.6%
	Thune	80.0%
		0.0%
	Other	4.4%

Union	Bengs	22.3%
	Thune	74.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.4%

Walworth	Bengs	14.8%
	Thune	80.7%
		0.0%
	Other	4.5%

Yankton	Bengs	27.8%
	Thune	68.3%
		0.0%
	Other	3.8%

Ziebach	Bengs	35.7%
	Thune	57.4%
		0.0%
	Other	6.9%

National DataGraph for 2022 - South Dakota Results for 2022

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved