<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GeoP</title>
	<link>http://uselectionatlas.org/WEBLOGS/shua</link>
	<description>Geography, culture and politics, with an emphasis on the Republican Party</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>The Geography of the GOP Primary Results: New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://uselectionatlas.org/WEBLOGS/shua/2008/02/02/3/</link>
		<comments>http://uselectionatlas.org/WEBLOGS/shua/2008/02/02/3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shua</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Primaries 2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[huckabee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uselectionatlas.org/WEBLOGS/shua/2008/02/02/3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In New Hampshire, you can see that McCain did very well across the state, but especially inland and mountainous areas. Romney narrowly beat out McCain in the more populous southeast.

   
Frame can't be displayed on your browser



It should be noted that, unlike the pattern in most states, New Hampshire&#8217;s more rural areas have more t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In New Hampshire, you can see that McCain did very well across the state, but especially inland and mountainous areas. Romney narrowly beat out McCain in the more populous southeast.<br />
<blockquote>
<blockquote><code>   
<iframe scrolling="no" style="border:1px solid #999;width:240px;height:299px" src="http://uselectionatlas.org/INC/if_county_map.php?year=2008&amp;off=0&amp;elect=2&amp;fips=33&amp;evt=P&amp;type=map&amp;pty=0" frameborder="0">Frame can't be displayed on your browser</iframe>

</code></p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>It should be noted that, unlike the pattern in most states, New Hampshire&#8217;s more rural areas have more t tended in the past few elections to vote more Democrat than Republican in Presidential races.  (see maps <a href="http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/comparemaps.php?year=2004&amp;fips=33&amp;f=0&amp;off=0&amp;elect=0">here</a> - Blue for Republican, Red for Democrat)   Nevertheless, in these rural counties southern conservative Mike Huckabee did better than he did in the southeastern areas, and in Coos County he got almost as many votes as Romney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uselectionatlas.org/WEBLOGS/shua/2008/02/02/3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Geography of the GOP Primary Results:  Iowa Caucus</title>
		<link>http://uselectionatlas.org/WEBLOGS/shua/2008/01/30/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://uselectionatlas.org/WEBLOGS/shua/2008/01/30/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shua</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Primaries 2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[huckabee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iowa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mccain]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[primary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[romney]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
The first map shows the results, by county, of the Iowa GOP caucus on Jan 2  (Huckabee: orange-brown, Romney: blue-green, Paul: purple) .
The second map shows the voting population in the 2004 Presidential election.  Because Iowa is an inland state, most of the counties are fairly regular in shape in size, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src="http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/img.php?year=2008&amp;st=IA&amp;type=map&amp;off=0&amp;elect=2&amp;fips=19" height="196" width="293" /><img src="http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/img.php?year=2004&amp;st=IA&amp;type=map_pop&amp;off=0&amp;elect=0" height="196" width="293" /></p>
<p>The first map shows the results, by county, of the Iowa GOP caucus on Jan 2  (Huckabee: orange-brown, Romney: blue-green, Paul: purple) .</p>
<p>The second map shows the voting population in the 2004 Presidential election.  Because Iowa is an inland state, most of the counties are fairly regular in shape in size, and thus one can easily see the voting age population density pattern across the state.  Huckabee generally wins the less populated, central areas of the state, and Romney wins the population centers.</p>
<p>McCain came in fourth at 13%, but where did he do relatively well? <img src="http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/img.php?year=2008&amp;st=IA&amp;pty=2&amp;type=map_pty&amp;off=0&amp;fips=19&amp;elect=2" height="196" width="293" /></p>
<p>McCain did best in a few counties that are moderately populated and were won by Huckabee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uselectionatlas.org/WEBLOGS/shua/2008/01/30/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

