Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adams	Hoeffel	26.1%
	Specter	65.9%
	Other	8.0%

Allegheny	Hoeffel	48.1%
	Specter	45.2%
	Other	6.7%

Armstrong	Hoeffel	31.9%
	Specter	56.8%
	Other	11.2%

Beaver	Hoeffel	46.2%
	Specter	45.3%
	Other	8.5%

Bedford	Hoeffel	24.4%
	Specter	67.3%
	Other	8.3%

Berks	Hoeffel	37.9%
	Specter	56.8%
	Other	5.3%

Blair	Hoeffel	27.3%
	Specter	64.2%
	Other	8.4%

Bradford	Hoeffel	24.8%
	Specter	70.4%
	Other	4.8%

Bucks	Hoeffel	40.7%
	Specter	56.6%
	Other	2.7%

Butler	Hoeffel	30.4%
	Specter	57.7%
	Other	11.9%

Cambria	Hoeffel	42.4%
	Specter	51.0%
	Other	6.7%

Cameron	Hoeffel	29.1%
	Specter	59.5%
	Other	11.4%

Carbon	Hoeffel	39.8%
	Specter	56.2%
	Other	4.0%

Centre	Hoeffel	38.8%
	Specter	53.8%
	Other	7.3%

Chester	Hoeffel	36.7%
	Specter	59.3%
	Other	4.0%

Clarion	Hoeffel	27.9%
	Specter	59.5%
	Other	12.6%

Clearfield	Hoeffel	34.2%
	Specter	56.6%
	Other	9.2%

Clinton	Hoeffel	34.3%
	Specter	59.2%
	Other	6.5%

Columbia	Hoeffel	31.3%
	Specter	63.2%
	Other	5.4%

Crawford	Hoeffel	31.1%
	Specter	63.9%
	Other	5.0%

Cumberland	Hoeffel	26.2%
	Specter	65.3%
	Other	8.5%

Dauphin	Hoeffel	34.5%
	Specter	58.4%
	Other	7.2%

Delaware	Hoeffel	45.6%
	Specter	52.4%
	Other	2.0%

Elk	Hoeffel	36.3%
	Specter	57.0%
	Other	6.8%

Erie	Hoeffel	36.5%
	Specter	59.9%
	Other	3.6%

Fayette	Hoeffel	48.4%
	Specter	44.3%
	Other	7.4%

Forest	Hoeffel	30.6%
	Specter	62.4%
	Other	7.1%

Franklin	Hoeffel	23.3%
	Specter	69.9%
	Other	6.8%

Fulton	Hoeffel	21.2%
	Specter	72.8%
	Other	6.0%

Greene	Hoeffel	43.3%
	Specter	49.6%
	Other	7.1%

Huntingdon	Hoeffel	27.2%
	Specter	65.3%
	Other	7.4%

Indiana	Hoeffel	34.9%
	Specter	54.4%
	Other	10.7%

Jefferson	Hoeffel	27.6%
	Specter	61.5%
	Other	10.9%

Juniata	Hoeffel	22.7%
	Specter	69.7%
	Other	7.6%

Lackawanna	Hoeffel	41.7%
	Specter	54.9%
	Other	3.3%

Lancaster	Hoeffel	26.7%
	Specter	61.7%
	Other	11.6%

Lawrence	Hoeffel	43.2%
	Specter	50.1%
	Other	6.7%

Lebanon	Hoeffel	24.9%
	Specter	66.8%
	Other	8.3%

Lehigh	Hoeffel	42.4%
	Specter	53.4%
	Other	4.2%

Luzerne	Hoeffel	40.0%
	Specter	56.0%
	Other	4.0%

Lycoming	Hoeffel	27.0%
	Specter	65.4%
	Other	7.5%

McKean	Hoeffel	26.6%
	Specter	67.9%
	Other	5.5%

Mercer	Hoeffel	42.1%
	Specter	51.7%
	Other	6.2%

Mifflin	Hoeffel	24.3%
	Specter	69.5%
	Other	6.1%

Monroe	Hoeffel	41.5%
	Specter	55.6%
	Other	2.9%

Montgomery	Hoeffel	45.0%
	Specter	52.3%
	Other	2.7%

Montour	Hoeffel	28.3%
	Specter	65.4%
	Other	6.3%

Northampton	Hoeffel	42.3%
	Specter	53.8%
	Other	3.9%

Northumberland	Hoeffel	31.3%
	Specter	62.8%
	Other	5.9%

Perry	Hoeffel	21.2%
	Specter	68.5%
	Other	10.3%

Philadelphia	Hoeffel	70.5%
	Specter	28.4%
	Other	1.1%

Pike	Hoeffel	34.4%
	Specter	62.9%
	Other	2.7%

Potter	Hoeffel	21.6%
	Specter	71.5%
	Other	6.9%

Schuylkill	Hoeffel	33.4%
	Specter	61.7%
	Other	4.9%

Snyder	Hoeffel	23.0%
	Specter	68.7%
	Other	8.3%

Somerset	Hoeffel	32.1%
	Specter	60.6%
	Other	7.3%

Sullivan	Hoeffel	29.2%
	Specter	65.8%
	Other	5.0%

Susquehanna	Hoeffel	28.3%
	Specter	66.4%
	Other	5.3%

Tioga	Hoeffel	22.4%
	Specter	69.6%
	Other	7.9%

Union	Hoeffel	30.1%
	Specter	63.3%
	Other	6.6%

Venango	Hoeffel	28.9%
	Specter	61.0%
	Other	10.1%

Warren	Hoeffel	29.1%
	Specter	63.0%
	Other	7.9%

Washington	Hoeffel	42.8%
	Specter	49.1%
	Other	8.2%

Wayne	Hoeffel	29.0%
	Specter	67.2%
	Other	3.8%

Westmoreland	Hoeffel	39.4%
	Specter	50.9%
	Other	9.7%

Wyoming	Hoeffel	26.0%
	Specter	66.7%
	Other	7.3%

York	Hoeffel	30.1%
	Specter	63.2%
	Other	6.7%

National DataGraph for 2004 - Pennsylvania Results for 2004

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved