Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-03-18

Map

Map

Autauga	Worley	36.4%
	Thomas	61.6%
	Other	2.0%

Baldwin	Worley	26.6%
	Thomas	70.3%
	Other	3.1%

Barbour	Worley	61.0%
	Thomas	37.2%
	Other	1.7%

Bibb	Worley	50.8%
	Thomas	47.6%
	Other	1.6%

Blount	Worley	34.1%
	Thomas	63.5%
	Other	2.4%

Bullock	Worley	74.2%
	Thomas	24.5%
	Other	1.4%

Butler	Worley	55.8%
	Thomas	42.7%
	Other	1.5%

Calhoun	Worley	49.4%
	Thomas	48.3%
	Other	2.3%

Chambers	Worley	54.0%
	Thomas	44.5%
	Other	1.5%

Cherokee	Worley	59.6%
	Thomas	38.3%
	Other	2.1%

Chilton	Worley	40.4%
	Thomas	57.6%
	Other	2.0%

Choctaw	Worley	59.9%
	Thomas	39.1%
	Other	1.0%

Clarke	Worley	53.6%
	Thomas	45.5%
	Other	0.9%

Clay	Worley	47.5%
	Thomas	50.1%
	Other	2.4%

Cleburne	Worley	48.0%
	Thomas	49.2%
	Other	2.7%

Coffee	Worley	45.7%
	Thomas	52.4%
	Other	2.0%

Colbert	Worley	59.9%
	Thomas	38.4%
	Other	1.7%

Conecuh	Worley	63.4%
	Thomas	34.9%
	Other	1.7%

Coosa	Worley	60.1%
	Thomas	37.6%
	Other	2.3%

Covington	Worley	49.3%
	Thomas	48.9%
	Other	1.9%

Crenshaw	Worley	54.9%
	Thomas	43.5%
	Other	1.6%

Cullman	Worley	44.5%
	Thomas	52.9%
	Other	2.6%

Dale	Worley	41.1%
	Thomas	56.8%
	Other	2.1%

Dallas	Worley	65.4%
	Thomas	33.3%
	Other	1.4%

DeKalb	Worley	46.1%
	Thomas	52.3%
	Other	1.6%

Elmore	Worley	35.2%
	Thomas	62.4%
	Other	2.4%

Escambia	Worley	47.1%
	Thomas	51.4%
	Other	1.5%

Etowah	Worley	54.0%
	Thomas	43.9%
	Other	2.1%

Fayette	Worley	58.8%
	Thomas	38.9%
	Other	2.3%

Franklin	Worley	58.2%
	Thomas	39.7%
	Other	2.2%

Geneva	Worley	37.8%
	Thomas	60.2%
	Other	2.0%

Greene	Worley	83.0%
	Thomas	16.4%
	Other	0.6%

Hale	Worley	70.4%
	Thomas	28.5%
	Other	1.0%

Henry	Worley	51.2%
	Thomas	47.2%
	Other	1.6%

Houston	Worley	36.8%
	Thomas	61.6%
	Other	1.6%

Jackson	Worley	58.5%
	Thomas	39.3%
	Other	2.2%

Jefferson	Worley	53.0%
	Thomas	45.1%
	Other	1.9%

Lamar	Worley	54.3%
	Thomas	44.5%
	Other	1.2%

Lauderdale	Worley	54.2%
	Thomas	43.8%
	Other	2.1%

Lawrence	Worley	66.3%
	Thomas	31.6%
	Other	2.1%

Lee	Worley	44.3%
	Thomas	53.0%
	Other	2.6%

Limestone	Worley	49.1%
	Thomas	48.7%
	Other	2.2%

Lowndes	Worley	72.4%
	Thomas	26.2%
	Other	1.4%

Macon	Worley	86.5%
	Thomas	12.2%
	Other	1.3%

Madison	Worley	49.0%
	Thomas	48.1%
	Other	3.0%

Marengo	Worley	60.2%
	Thomas	38.7%
	Other	1.1%

Marion	Worley	53.9%
	Thomas	43.9%
	Other	2.3%

Marshall	Worley	46.2%
	Thomas	51.1%
	Other	2.7%

Mobile	Worley	43.6%
	Thomas	54.3%
	Other	2.1%

Monroe	Worley	49.2%
	Thomas	49.3%
	Other	1.5%

Montgomery	Worley	54.0%
	Thomas	44.5%
	Other	1.5%

Morgan	Worley	50.2%
	Thomas	47.8%
	Other	2.0%

Perry	Worley	76.4%
	Thomas	22.9%
	Other	0.8%

Pickens	Worley	59.1%
	Thomas	39.6%
	Other	1.4%

Pike	Worley	49.1%
	Thomas	49.2%
	Other	1.7%

Randolph	Worley	52.0%
	Thomas	46.1%
	Other	1.9%

Russell	Worley	62.2%
	Thomas	36.0%
	Other	1.8%

St. Clair	Worley	25.8%
	Thomas	72.0%
	Other	2.2%

Shelby	Worley	34.1%
	Thomas	63.5%
	Other	2.4%

Sumter	Worley	76.6%
	Thomas	22.4%
	Other	1.0%

Talladega	Worley	54.3%
	Thomas	43.7%
	Other	2.0%

Tallapoosa	Worley	50.1%
	Thomas	48.0%
	Other	1.8%

Tuscaloosa	Worley	50.6%
	Thomas	47.5%
	Other	1.9%

Walker	Worley	58.0%
	Thomas	40.1%
	Other	2.0%

Washington	Worley	57.3%
	Thomas	40.6%
	Other	2.0%

Wilcox	Worley	71.5%
	Thomas	27.4%
	Other	1.1%

Winston	Worley	38.1%
	Thomas	59.5%
	Other	2.4%

National DataGraph for 2002 - Alabama Results for 2002

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved