Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-04-27

Map

Map

Adams	McCann	41.5%
	Shafer	58.4%
	Other	0.2%

Allegheny	McCann	51.4%
	Shafer	48.1%
	Other	0.5%

Armstrong	McCann	44.5%
	Shafer	55.0%
	Other	0.5%

Beaver	McCann	54.6%
	Shafer	44.7%
	Other	0.6%

Bedford	McCann	38.9%
	Shafer	60.8%
	Other	0.3%

Berks	McCann	49.8%
	Shafer	49.8%
	Other	0.4%

Blair	McCann	36.7%
	Shafer	62.9%
	Other	0.4%

Bradford	McCann	33.1%
	Shafer	66.7%
	Other	0.2%

Bucks	McCann	43.1%
	Shafer	56.5%
	Other	0.3%

Butler	McCann	39.7%
	Shafer	59.9%
	Other	0.4%

Cambria	McCann	52.5%
	Shafer	46.2%
	Other	1.3%

Cameron	McCann	38.9%
	Shafer	60.9%
	Other	0.2%

Carbon	McCann	49.0%
	Shafer	50.8%
	Other	0.2%

Centre	McCann	36.3%
	Shafer	63.3%
	Other	0.3%

Chester	McCann	34.4%
	Shafer	65.4%
	Other	0.2%

Clarion	McCann	41.3%
	Shafer	58.4%
	Other	0.3%

Clearfield	McCann	46.2%
	Shafer	53.3%
	Other	0.5%

Clinton	McCann	43.5%
	Shafer	56.1%
	Other	0.4%

Columbia	McCann	45.3%
	Shafer	54.5%
	Other	0.2%

Crawford	McCann	35.6%
	Shafer	64.1%
	Other	0.4%

Cumberland	McCann	35.2%
	Shafer	64.6%
	Other	0.1%

Dauphin	McCann	35.0%
	Shafer	64.7%
	Other	0.2%

Delaware	McCann	38.5%
	Shafer	61.3%
	Other	0.2%

Elk	McCann	50.4%
	Shafer	49.2%
	Other	0.4%

Erie	McCann	48.6%
	Shafer	51.2%
	Other	0.3%

Fayette	McCann	58.9%
	Shafer	40.8%
	Other	0.3%

Forest	McCann	41.6%
	Shafer	58.2%
	Other	0.2%

Franklin	McCann	41.1%
	Shafer	58.7%
	Other	0.2%

Fulton	McCann	45.0%
	Shafer	54.9%
	Other	0.2%

Greene	McCann	61.7%
	Shafer	38.0%
	Other	0.3%

Huntingdon	McCann	35.9%
	Shafer	63.6%
	Other	0.4%

Indiana	McCann	42.0%
	Shafer	57.5%
	Other	0.5%

Jefferson	McCann	39.7%
	Shafer	60.1%
	Other	0.2%

Juniata	McCann	43.6%
	Shafer	56.3%
	Other	0.1%

Lackawanna	McCann	53.9%
	Shafer	46.0%
	Other	0.1%

Lancaster	McCann	30.1%
	Shafer	69.7%
	Other	0.2%

Lawrence	McCann	47.7%
	Shafer	51.7%
	Other	0.7%

Lebanon	McCann	32.6%
	Shafer	67.2%
	Other	0.2%

Lehigh	McCann	45.0%
	Shafer	54.7%
	Other	0.3%

Luzerne	McCann	52.5%
	Shafer	47.1%
	Other	0.4%

Lycoming	McCann	40.1%
	Shafer	59.6%
	Other	0.3%

McKean	McCann	36.5%
	Shafer	63.1%
	Other	0.5%

Mercer	McCann	45.4%
	Shafer	54.3%
	Other	0.3%

Mifflin	McCann	39.4%
	Shafer	60.2%
	Other	0.4%

Monroe	McCann	45.3%
	Shafer	54.4%
	Other	0.2%

Montgomery	McCann	34.6%
	Shafer	65.2%
	Other	0.2%

Montour	McCann	43.7%
	Shafer	56.1%
	Other	0.2%

Northampton	McCann	53.8%
	Shafer	45.8%
	Other	0.4%

Northumberland	McCann	43.4%
	Shafer	56.4%
	Other	0.2%

Perry	McCann	36.7%
	Shafer	63.1%
	Other	0.2%

Philadelphia	McCann	59.5%
	Shafer	40.2%
	Other	0.3%

Pike	McCann	33.9%
	Shafer	65.9%
	Other	0.2%

Potter	McCann	35.9%
	Shafer	63.8%
	Other	0.4%

Schuylkill	McCann	45.3%
	Shafer	54.4%
	Other	0.3%

Snyder	McCann	26.6%
	Shafer	73.2%
	Other	0.2%

Somerset	McCann	41.6%
	Shafer	58.0%
	Other	0.4%

Sullivan	McCann	44.3%
	Shafer	55.5%
	Other	0.1%

Susquehanna	McCann	36.5%
	Shafer	63.3%
	Other	0.2%

Tioga	McCann	31.8%
	Shafer	68.0%
	Other	0.2%

Union	McCann	25.4%
	Shafer	74.4%
	Other	0.2%

Venango	McCann	35.1%
	Shafer	64.6%
	Other	0.3%

Warren	McCann	36.5%
	Shafer	63.2%
	Other	0.3%

Washington	McCann	58.0%
	Shafer	41.5%
	Other	0.5%

Wayne	McCann	31.0%
	Shafer	68.7%
	Other	0.3%

Westmoreland	McCann	55.0%
	Shafer	44.3%
	Other	0.6%

Wyoming	McCann	30.6%
	Shafer	69.1%
	Other	0.3%

York	McCann	45.7%
	Shafer	54.0%
	Other	0.2%

National DataGraph for 1962 - Pennsylvania Results for 1962

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved