Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2011-03-18

Map

Map

Adams	Knoll	33.8%
	Hafer	62.0%
	Other	4.2%

Allegheny	Knoll	51.4%
	Hafer	45.5%
	Other	3.2%

Armstrong	Knoll	43.4%
	Hafer	52.9%
	Other	3.7%

Beaver	Knoll	55.4%
	Hafer	41.5%
	Other	3.1%

Bedford	Knoll	31.6%
	Hafer	65.6%
	Other	2.8%

Berks	Knoll	40.8%
	Hafer	55.0%
	Other	4.2%

Blair	Knoll	34.5%
	Hafer	62.3%
	Other	3.2%

Bradford	Knoll	29.0%
	Hafer	66.9%
	Other	4.1%

Bucks	Knoll	43.8%
	Hafer	52.3%
	Other	3.9%

Butler	Knoll	38.2%
	Hafer	58.3%
	Other	3.5%

Cambria	Knoll	57.2%
	Hafer	39.2%
	Other	3.6%

Cameron	Knoll	40.5%
	Hafer	54.4%
	Other	5.0%

Carbon	Knoll	48.6%
	Hafer	47.2%
	Other	4.2%

Centre	Knoll	39.1%
	Hafer	53.8%
	Other	7.1%

Chester	Knoll	36.2%
	Hafer	59.1%
	Other	4.7%

Clarion	Knoll	38.7%
	Hafer	57.4%
	Other	3.9%

Clearfield	Knoll	45.5%
	Hafer	50.8%
	Other	3.6%

Clinton	Knoll	43.2%
	Hafer	52.9%
	Other	3.9%

Columbia	Knoll	40.3%
	Hafer	55.3%
	Other	4.3%

Crawford	Knoll	42.5%
	Hafer	54.1%
	Other	3.3%

Cumberland	Knoll	27.0%
	Hafer	68.9%
	Other	4.1%

Dauphin	Knoll	34.2%
	Hafer	62.4%
	Other	3.4%

Delaware	Knoll	46.2%
	Hafer	50.8%
	Other	3.0%

Elk	Knoll	54.0%
	Hafer	42.0%
	Other	4.0%

Erie	Knoll	55.0%
	Hafer	41.7%
	Other	3.3%

Fayette	Knoll	58.2%
	Hafer	38.9%
	Other	2.9%

Forest	Knoll	37.6%
	Hafer	58.8%
	Other	3.6%

Franklin	Knoll	29.5%
	Hafer	67.1%
	Other	3.5%

Fulton	Knoll	31.3%
	Hafer	65.9%
	Other	2.8%

Greene	Knoll	58.1%
	Hafer	37.7%
	Other	4.2%

Huntingdon	Knoll	31.4%
	Hafer	64.0%
	Other	4.6%

Indiana	Knoll	45.2%
	Hafer	51.6%
	Other	3.2%

Jefferson	Knoll	38.7%
	Hafer	57.4%
	Other	4.0%

Juniata	Knoll	29.3%
	Hafer	68.4%
	Other	2.4%

Lackawanna	Knoll	59.8%
	Hafer	36.8%
	Other	3.4%

Lancaster	Knoll	30.5%
	Hafer	66.4%
	Other	3.1%

Lawrence	Knoll	53.1%
	Hafer	43.3%
	Other	3.6%

Lebanon	Knoll	31.3%
	Hafer	66.1%
	Other	2.5%

Lehigh	Knoll	44.6%
	Hafer	51.9%
	Other	3.4%

Luzerne	Knoll	51.3%
	Hafer	44.7%
	Other	4.0%

Lycoming	Knoll	32.3%
	Hafer	63.6%
	Other	4.1%

McKean	Knoll	30.4%
	Hafer	65.6%
	Other	4.0%

Mercer	Knoll	48.5%
	Hafer	48.2%
	Other	3.2%

Mifflin	Knoll	30.2%
	Hafer	67.7%
	Other	2.1%

Monroe	Knoll	43.0%
	Hafer	52.2%
	Other	4.8%

Montgomery	Knoll	45.0%
	Hafer	51.7%
	Other	3.2%

Montour	Knoll	36.1%
	Hafer	60.7%
	Other	3.2%

Northampton	Knoll	47.4%
	Hafer	48.7%
	Other	3.8%

Northumberland	Knoll	39.4%
	Hafer	56.8%
	Other	3.7%

Perry	Knoll	24.9%
	Hafer	71.3%
	Other	3.8%

Philadelphia	Knoll	76.5%
	Hafer	20.8%
	Other	2.8%

Pike	Knoll	39.8%
	Hafer	55.5%
	Other	4.6%

Potter	Knoll	29.0%
	Hafer	66.0%
	Other	4.9%

Schuylkill	Knoll	40.4%
	Hafer	55.9%
	Other	3.6%

Snyder	Knoll	26.8%
	Hafer	69.5%
	Other	3.7%

Somerset	Knoll	43.9%
	Hafer	53.2%
	Other	2.9%

Sullivan	Knoll	33.2%
	Hafer	62.5%
	Other	4.3%

Susquehanna	Knoll	36.0%
	Hafer	60.1%
	Other	3.9%

Tioga	Knoll	27.5%
	Hafer	66.6%
	Other	5.9%

Union	Knoll	29.9%
	Hafer	65.3%
	Other	4.8%

Venango	Knoll	41.9%
	Hafer	54.3%
	Other	3.8%

Warren	Knoll	41.1%
	Hafer	53.6%
	Other	5.3%

Washington	Knoll	52.0%
	Hafer	44.6%
	Other	3.4%

Wayne	Knoll	34.6%
	Hafer	61.3%
	Other	4.1%

Westmoreland	Knoll	48.2%
	Hafer	49.3%
	Other	2.5%

Wyoming	Knoll	34.7%
	Hafer	61.7%
	Other	3.6%

York	Knoll	32.5%
	Hafer	64.2%
	Other	3.2%

National DataGraph for 2000 - Pennsylvania Results for 2000

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved