Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2007-05-18

Map

Map

Adams	Wagner	35.6%
	Peters	60.7%
	Other	3.6%

Allegheny	Wagner	64.6%
	Peters	33.0%
	Other	2.4%

Armstrong	Wagner	49.9%
	Peters	47.6%
	Other	2.5%

Beaver	Wagner	61.5%
	Peters	36.0%
	Other	2.6%

Bedford	Wagner	31.8%
	Peters	65.9%
	Other	2.3%

Berks	Wagner	46.7%
	Peters	49.9%
	Other	3.4%

Blair	Wagner	35.8%
	Peters	61.3%
	Other	3.0%

Bradford	Wagner	32.5%
	Peters	64.4%
	Other	3.1%

Bucks	Wagner	48.4%
	Peters	49.4%
	Other	2.2%

Butler	Wagner	44.3%
	Peters	52.8%
	Other	2.9%

Cambria	Wagner	58.0%
	Peters	39.2%
	Other	2.8%

Cameron	Wagner	41.1%
	Peters	55.7%
	Other	3.2%

Carbon	Wagner	50.8%
	Peters	46.2%
	Other	2.9%

Centre	Wagner	44.6%
	Peters	50.6%
	Other	4.8%

Chester	Wagner	43.3%
	Peters	53.4%
	Other	3.3%

Clarion	Wagner	40.5%
	Peters	54.7%
	Other	4.8%

Clearfield	Wagner	45.5%
	Peters	52.0%
	Other	2.6%

Clinton	Wagner	43.8%
	Peters	53.4%
	Other	2.9%

Columbia	Wagner	43.8%
	Peters	52.7%
	Other	3.5%

Crawford	Wagner	43.7%
	Peters	53.8%
	Other	2.5%

Cumberland	Wagner	35.0%
	Peters	61.2%
	Other	3.8%

Dauphin	Wagner	44.4%
	Peters	52.6%
	Other	3.0%

Delaware	Wagner	52.5%
	Peters	45.8%
	Other	1.7%

Elk	Wagner	55.0%
	Peters	42.7%
	Other	2.3%

Erie	Wagner	54.3%
	Peters	43.0%
	Other	2.7%

Fayette	Wagner	64.7%
	Peters	32.7%
	Other	2.6%

Forest	Wagner	42.2%
	Peters	54.7%
	Other	3.1%

Franklin	Wagner	30.6%
	Peters	66.7%
	Other	2.7%

Fulton	Wagner	29.9%
	Peters	66.8%
	Other	3.3%

Greene	Wagner	64.9%
	Peters	32.1%
	Other	3.0%

Huntingdon	Wagner	34.6%
	Peters	62.2%
	Other	3.2%

Indiana	Wagner	51.0%
	Peters	46.0%
	Other	3.0%

Jefferson	Wagner	37.6%
	Peters	59.6%
	Other	2.8%

Juniata	Wagner	33.7%
	Peters	63.3%
	Other	3.1%

Lackawanna	Wagner	45.7%
	Peters	52.2%
	Other	2.1%

Lancaster	Wagner	31.4%
	Peters	66.5%
	Other	2.1%

Lawrence	Wagner	57.5%
	Peters	40.0%
	Other	2.5%

Lebanon	Wagner	31.4%
	Peters	66.0%
	Other	2.6%

Lehigh	Wagner	49.2%
	Peters	48.1%
	Other	2.7%

Luzerne	Wagner	50.6%
	Peters	46.7%
	Other	2.7%

Lycoming	Wagner	31.9%
	Peters	65.6%
	Other	2.4%

McKean	Wagner	35.5%
	Peters	62.0%
	Other	2.4%

Mercer	Wagner	51.6%
	Peters	45.4%
	Other	3.0%

Mifflin	Wagner	30.0%
	Peters	67.7%
	Other	2.3%

Monroe	Wagner	47.5%
	Peters	50.0%
	Other	2.5%

Montgomery	Wagner	52.2%
	Peters	45.5%
	Other	2.3%

Montour	Wagner	39.1%
	Peters	57.7%
	Other	3.2%

Northampton	Wagner	50.4%
	Peters	46.9%
	Other	2.8%

Northumberland	Wagner	41.3%
	Peters	55.7%
	Other	3.0%

Perry	Wagner	29.3%
	Peters	67.2%
	Other	3.5%

Philadelphia	Wagner	80.7%
	Peters	17.5%
	Other	1.8%

Pike	Wagner	39.9%
	Peters	57.9%
	Other	2.2%

Potter	Wagner	30.5%
	Peters	66.5%
	Other	3.0%

Schuylkill	Wagner	46.3%
	Peters	50.6%
	Other	3.1%

Snyder	Wagner	30.3%
	Peters	67.1%
	Other	2.6%

Somerset	Wagner	45.2%
	Peters	52.8%
	Other	2.0%

Sullivan	Wagner	37.2%
	Peters	59.4%
	Other	3.4%

Susquehanna	Wagner	35.5%
	Peters	61.1%
	Other	3.4%

Tioga	Wagner	30.4%
	Peters	65.7%
	Other	3.8%

Union	Wagner	34.8%
	Peters	62.1%
	Other	3.0%

Venango	Wagner	41.0%
	Peters	54.8%
	Other	4.2%

Warren	Wagner	42.0%
	Peters	54.0%
	Other	4.0%

Washington	Wagner	60.7%
	Peters	37.2%
	Other	2.0%

Wayne	Wagner	33.7%
	Peters	63.4%
	Other	2.8%

Westmoreland	Wagner	54.6%
	Peters	43.5%
	Other	1.8%

Wyoming	Wagner	31.1%
	Peters	65.8%
	Other	3.1%

York	Wagner	34.6%
	Peters	62.7%
	Other	2.7%

National DataGraph for 2004 - Pennsylvania Results for 2004

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved