Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-01-11

Map

Map

Adams	McCord	35.1%
	Vaughan	59.5%
	Other	5.3%

Allegheny	McCord	58.5%
	Vaughan	37.2%
	Other	4.3%

Armstrong	McCord	37.2%
	Vaughan	57.5%
	Other	5.3%

Beaver	McCord	50.4%
	Vaughan	45.1%
	Other	4.6%

Bedford	McCord	27.2%
	Vaughan	68.6%
	Other	4.2%

Berks	McCord	48.5%
	Vaughan	48.3%
	Other	3.2%

Blair	McCord	34.7%
	Vaughan	61.0%
	Other	4.3%

Bradford	McCord	32.7%
	Vaughan	62.3%
	Other	5.0%

Bucks	McCord	49.4%
	Vaughan	48.4%
	Other	2.2%

Butler	McCord	34.1%
	Vaughan	61.3%
	Other	4.6%

Cambria	McCord	50.7%
	Vaughan	44.3%
	Other	5.0%

Cameron	McCord	37.9%
	Vaughan	56.6%
	Other	5.6%

Carbon	McCord	48.2%
	Vaughan	46.7%
	Other	5.1%

Centre	McCord	48.1%
	Vaughan	46.0%
	Other	5.9%

Chester	McCord	46.3%
	Vaughan	49.7%
	Other	4.0%

Clarion	McCord	36.0%
	Vaughan	58.2%
	Other	5.8%

Clearfield	McCord	39.9%
	Vaughan	54.8%
	Other	5.2%

Clinton	McCord	45.1%
	Vaughan	50.2%
	Other	4.7%

Columbia	McCord	44.1%
	Vaughan	50.8%
	Other	5.1%

Crawford	McCord	39.5%
	Vaughan	55.7%
	Other	4.8%

Cumberland	McCord	40.6%
	Vaughan	54.8%
	Other	4.6%

Dauphin	McCord	53.3%
	Vaughan	44.3%
	Other	2.4%

Delaware	McCord	57.1%
	Vaughan	41.2%
	Other	1.7%

Elk	McCord	46.1%
	Vaughan	48.6%
	Other	5.3%

Erie	McCord	57.2%
	Vaughan	38.5%
	Other	4.4%

Fayette	McCord	53.4%
	Vaughan	42.8%
	Other	3.8%

Forest	McCord	38.4%
	Vaughan	54.9%
	Other	6.7%

Franklin	McCord	29.9%
	Vaughan	65.5%
	Other	4.7%

Fulton	McCord	24.7%
	Vaughan	70.8%
	Other	4.5%

Greene	McCord	49.6%
	Vaughan	46.1%
	Other	4.2%

Huntingdon	McCord	32.2%
	Vaughan	63.0%
	Other	4.7%

Indiana	McCord	42.6%
	Vaughan	51.7%
	Other	5.8%

Jefferson	McCord	31.1%
	Vaughan	64.1%
	Other	4.8%

Juniata	McCord	31.2%
	Vaughan	63.5%
	Other	5.3%

Lackawanna	McCord	65.4%
	Vaughan	29.9%
	Other	4.7%

Lancaster	McCord	37.8%
	Vaughan	58.2%
	Other	4.0%

Lawrence	McCord	48.7%
	Vaughan	47.5%
	Other	3.8%

Lebanon	McCord	35.8%
	Vaughan	59.7%
	Other	4.5%

Lehigh	McCord	53.0%
	Vaughan	43.0%
	Other	3.9%

Luzerne	McCord	54.8%
	Vaughan	40.0%
	Other	5.2%

Lycoming	McCord	34.2%
	Vaughan	61.4%
	Other	4.4%

McKean	McCord	34.7%
	Vaughan	61.2%
	Other	4.1%

Mercer	McCord	47.8%
	Vaughan	48.0%
	Other	4.2%

Mifflin	McCord	30.9%
	Vaughan	65.1%
	Other	4.0%

Monroe	McCord	55.2%
	Vaughan	42.3%
	Other	2.5%

Montgomery	McCord	56.1%
	Vaughan	42.5%
	Other	1.4%

Montour	McCord	39.1%
	Vaughan	55.2%
	Other	5.7%

Northampton	McCord	51.8%
	Vaughan	45.9%
	Other	2.3%

Northumberland	McCord	40.6%
	Vaughan	54.4%
	Other	5.1%

Perry	McCord	32.9%
	Vaughan	62.0%
	Other	5.0%

Philadelphia	McCord	85.5%
	Vaughan	13.3%
	Other	1.2%

Pike	McCord	42.6%
	Vaughan	53.2%
	Other	4.2%

Potter	McCord	27.0%
	Vaughan	68.3%
	Other	4.7%

Schuylkill	McCord	47.8%
	Vaughan	47.1%
	Other	5.0%

Snyder	McCord	29.6%
	Vaughan	64.9%
	Other	5.5%

Somerset	McCord	34.0%
	Vaughan	60.8%
	Other	5.2%

Sullivan	McCord	37.4%
	Vaughan	57.7%
	Other	4.9%

Susquehanna	McCord	36.0%
	Vaughan	58.4%
	Other	5.6%

Tioga	McCord	28.8%
	Vaughan	66.7%
	Other	4.5%

Union	McCord	36.9%
	Vaughan	58.8%
	Other	4.2%

Venango	McCord	35.4%
	Vaughan	55.9%
	Other	8.7%

Warren	McCord	39.6%
	Vaughan	54.3%
	Other	6.1%

Washington	McCord	43.5%
	Vaughan	52.7%
	Other	3.8%

Wayne	McCord	38.5%
	Vaughan	56.3%
	Other	5.1%

Westmoreland	McCord	42.9%
	Vaughan	53.2%
	Other	4.0%

Wyoming	McCord	39.7%
	Vaughan	54.7%
	Other	5.6%

York	McCord	38.5%
	Vaughan	56.7%
	Other	4.8%

National DataGraph for 2012 - Pennsylvania Results for 2012

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved